Was India invaded by Indo-Europeans Aryans ?

[Deleted member 10987]

Asking for all the Bhais here

 

[Deleted member 8576]

idk

 

[Beetlejuice]

@TRUE_CEL @streege thoughts?

 

[Deleted member 10987]

@TRUE_CEL @streege thoughts?

Streege is kurdish
Not indian/paki

 

[Beetlejuice]

Streege is kurdish
Not indian/paki

I know but he knows a little bit of history...

 

[Gengar’s Ghost]

@TRUE_CEL @streege thoughts?

thanks for the tag. the word "indo" in indo-european already suggests they were mixed with people of the subcontinent. the name "india" comes from the word "hind" which means "(the) indus (river)" which only flows through pakistan. basically present day indians and hindus have literally hijacked another identity and claimed it as their own. in name only though. but the culture that was eventually shaped by the aryans is not the oldest culture in the region, in fact the oldest culture and its people are so ancient that we have no idea who they were at all, what language they spoke, etc. these people predated the dravidians by thousands of years. however the hindus of today base their cultural and religious identity on the vedic civilization, but like i said, its not the oldest. so these hindpoos dindpoos can cope all they want when they say that the islamic people in the subcontinent were hindus, because before that we were something entirely different so their little fantasy doesnt apply.

 

[Deleted member 7753]

Yes, Greeks, Portuguese, British and the Dutch have all conquered parts of or the entire Indian subcontinent.

 

[Deleted member 2205]

I'm not sure, but what I do no is the lighter skinned Indian variant "Indid", is not a result of European ancestry like many on here try to claim. What is though, is indo nordic, which you will find in the more northern parts of india, Pakistan, and Afghanistan

 

[Be_ConfidentBro]

Penis

 

[curryslayerordeath]

the same ppl that spread thru out a vast part of the world, mixed into indian subcontinent too, its not rly european.(more like they shared a common portion of ancestry)

I'm not sure, but what I do no is the lighter skinned Indian variant "Indid", is not a result of European ancestry like many on here try to claim. What is though, is indo nordic, which you will find in the more northern parts of india, Pakistan, and Afghanistan

nah indo nordic isnt the result of europeans either, those are mostly based on external appearance (the indo nordics are composed of higher indo aryan ancestry, no meme)

 

[Deleted member 2205]

the same ppl that spread thru out a vast part of the world, mixed into indian subcontinent too, its not rly european.(more like they shared a common portion of ancestry)


nah indo nordic isnt the result of europeans either, those are mostly based on external appearance (the indo nordics are composed of higher indo aryan ancestry, no meme)

Came from ancient aryans but those ancient aryans had nordic ancestry, hence the name

 

[curryslayerordeath]

Came from ancient aryans but those ancient aryans had nordic ancestry, hence the name

nah those ancient aryans mixed with the native-type populations near modern day nordic countries too, its more like the vice versa

the name isnt even derived from the european ppl, its meant as a regional description and also implies a proportion of similar ancestry

 

[StressShady]

Asking for all the Bhais here

Yes bhai