Was it considered a halo to be masculine and dumb and indifferent to redpill, be bluepill in the 1950s

[Deleted member 19944]

Seemed that way based on all the boomers I met

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Redpill itself is a low iq cope

 

[Gandy]

There was actually a gender imbalance after the wars in favor of women. That means there were more young women alive than men in all western countries (though the country worst hit by this was the Soviet Union with ~70 young men for every 100 women).

Post-WWII: gender ratios in select countries 1950 | Statista

The Second World War had a sever impact on gender ratios across European countries, particularly in the Soviet Union.

www.statista.com

You could have been an autistic short 0/10 bald fat guy and met women on the way to the milk store who would openly ask you whether you're up for marriage or dating.

You were also able to get a job just by walking into a company and asking when you can start your first shift, with no real qualifications, CV or interview required, and no 300 competitors trying to get that same position.
You were able to pay off a car in full in about 4 months and a decent big suburban house within 2 years.

Why buying a house today is so much harder than in 1950

A postwar boom, legal discrimination, and new mortgage loans made suburban housing accessible, and set the stage for today’s challenging market

archive.curbed.com

The world these boomers lived is so far removed from the world we currently live in (and which also has 8.5 billion people now instead of 2.5 billion) they just cannot connect with the life experience young adults today are forced to live in (shitty wages, a small cubicle takes 30 years to pay off, dating market has become extremely looks-centric now that women have their own cash and entered the workforce etc).

The modern world is a hellscape prison for those who aren't going to inherit money, unless they are some kind of a high IQ tech savant who can create a startup and sell it. It's also extremely rough to date as an average looking man in the 2020s.

 

[ifyouwannabemylover]

boomers are deluded

 

[alphamaxxxx]

Redpill itself is a low iq cope

redpill is only cope if youre too beta and low iq to ascend*

 

[Ceo of cope]

No, boomers just lack self awareness

 

[HerpDerpson]

dating market has become extremely looks-centric

That's how it should be thought.

You could have been an autistic short 0/10 bald fat guy and met women on the way to the milk store who would openly ask you whether you're up for marriage or dating.

And it would be nothing more than a betabuxx. If women could have provided for themselves back then, skewed gender ratio would have done nothing for those guys.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

redpill is only cope if youre too beta and low iq to ascend*

 

[Chinacurry]

It wasn't a halo cos everyone was masc, and bluegill held in 80% of cases, as @Gandy Relatively high IQ post states. In the 20% where it didn't hold, like where people needed to RELATIVELY hustle a lot and there were a lot of high value people, say NYC, then Redhill worked.

It was a completely different time. The world needed rebuilding, and we weren't gonna get a bunch of ricemen in factories or indian coders to do it, and yeah there were 2-3bn people

 

[latincell95]

You could have been an autistic short 0/10 bald fat guy and met women on the way to the milk store who would openly ask you whether you're up for marriage or dating.

Errrr…..no. Most of those boomers were HTNs/Chadlites in their prime. They kept in shape due to working at the car factory day in and day out.

 

[latincell95]

There was actually a gender imbalance after the wars in favor of women. That means there were more young women alive than men in all western countries (though the country worst hit by this was the Soviet Union with ~70 young men for every 100 women).

Post-WWII: gender ratios in select countries 1950 | Statista

The Second World War had a sever impact on gender ratios across European countries, particularly in the Soviet Union.

www.statista.com

You could have been an autistic short 0/10 bald fat guy and met women on the way to the milk store who would openly ask you whether you're up for marriage or dating.

You were also able to get a job just by walking into a company and asking when you can start your first shift, with no real qualifications, CV or interview required, and no 300 competitors trying to get that same position.
You were able to pay off a car in full in about 4 months and a decent big suburban house within 2 years.

Why buying a house today is so much harder than in 1950

A postwar boom, legal discrimination, and new mortgage loans made suburban housing accessible, and set the stage for today’s challenging market

archive.curbed.com

The world these boomers lived is so far removed from the world we currently live in (and which also has 8.5 billion people now instead of 2.5 billion) they just cannot connect with the life experience young adults today are forced to live in (shitty wages, a small cubicle takes 30 years to pay off, dating market has become extremely looks-centric now that women have their own cash and entered the workforce etc).

The modern world is a hellscape prison for those who aren't going to inherit money, unless they are some kind of a high IQ tech savant who can create a startup and sell it. It's also extremely rough to date as an average looking man in the 2020s.

I would add that it all went to shit in the 60s and 70s with first, the “Great Society” reform laws by LBJ aka the welfare state we currently have, the contraceptive pill, and then in 1973, the final nail in the coffin: no fault divorce laws (e.g. a foid would get all the prizes and rewards and as a men you would be left with shit ).

 

[Gandy]

If women could have provided for themselves back then, skewed gender ratio would have done nothing for those guys.

I strongly agree with this, these women ultimately put up with very ugly older men out of financial necessity. Not because there was a shortage of men (because there was).

Had these women been able to work (~75% of women did not work in the 50s) or had any money, society would have been just as lookist back then.

Unless women need money from men, they have no need to associate with ugly or average men.

Changes in women’s labor force participation in the 20th century : The Economics Daily : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

Changes in women’s labor force participation in the 20th century

www.bls.gov

Although I obviously wasn't alive back then, I dare to say one night stands were even more chad-exclusive back then than now, due to the stigma associated with nonmarital relationships.
You put your family reputation and personal wellbeing at risk by having one night stands (and due to no contraception, illegitimate children).