Was jesus really white?

D

Deleted member 15164

Kraken
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Posts
4,746
Reputation
2,542
How can a white man spill his blood for blacks when whites couldn't even share land with blacks?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Beetlejuice
Jesus never existed. He is a figment of the imagination of Christian crackheads.
 
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 17791, CFW432, fauxfox and 5 others
???????
 
  • +1
Reactions: Erik-Jón
white in Brazil
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ShowerMaxxing
he was short brown and ugly, really a god among trucels
Mmo9fxkxz7d51
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
  • JFL
Reactions: Biiyo03, ShowerMaxxing, fauxfox and 4 others
.
 
Last edited:
If Jesus walked by a church convention in the south, half the congregation would call him a sandnigger under their breath.

And that's the funniest shit I must say. :forcedsmile:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Biiyo03, Elvisandreaa, ShowerMaxxing and 6 others
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 16369
Jesus was a Levantine Jew

@Octillionaire
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 16369
Jesus is a Jewish lie
 
Jesus and Muhammad were both White

Christ with beard1


main-qimg-e349294d6b59a1fd76dc207deb86a095-pjlq
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: EggKing
Jesus never existed. He is a figment of the imagination of Christian crackheads.
Whether or not you believe in his divinity, all historians agree that there’s overwhelming evidence to prove that he did exist as a person.

Now, as for his race, was Jesus white? It depends on your definition of white.

He was middle eastern and so he certainly was tan and dark haired. Even then, some people could still consider him white.

Some only consider nordics white, some stretch that to Southern Europeans and Slavs… while others include Turks and Mediterraneans as whites too, depends who you ask.

Jesus had a caucasoid skull and olive skin. Similar to this man for example:

1661051516940


Is he white? In brazil he’d certainly be considered white. It depends.
 
How can a white man spill his blood for blacks when whites couldn't even share land with blacks?
he was short brown and ugly, really a god among trucels
View attachment 1831320
White only means European, and someone is only white if they have less than 12.5% [1/8] non-white [non-Euro] blood because that indicates the presence of at least 1 full non-white direct grandparent.

For example, my mother is fully white both genetically and pheno wise because she has less than 12.5% non-white blood, but my grandfather [her father] isn't fully white and is just "castizo" because he has more than 12.5% non-white blood despite looking the whitest out of all us phenotypically with light brown hair, clear legit a10 eyes, and a nonstandard North Atlantid pheno but with lighter colouring.

However, because my grandmother [her mother] is from the very North of Spain [Asturias, the only region never conquered by the moors] my mother ends up being completely white both genetically and phenotypically.


Moving back on topic...

I already made a thread on this topic not that long ago too:

Original
1636319179563-png.1395837
1636319188488-png.1395839

Originally I just thought of posting a pic and asking you faggots to give Him a rating, but then I realized that might be disrespectful to Him considering how inconsiderate some of you can be here, so instead I just posted a pic of what he really looked like because it gets annoying when you faggots keep posting muh black, muh aryan, muh gook, and yes I kid you not even legit curry Jesus.




Now keep in mind that the picture is actually 2 separate images spliced in one vertically to represent his dual natures, so it doesn't look "weird" it's done on purpose for symbolic reasons.


So here are some better views of each section on their own.

Resurrected form-
1636319062340-png.1395832



Human form-
1636319088352-png.1395833



Side by side-
1636319024082-png.1395831
 
If Jesus walked by a church convention in the south, half the congregation would call him a sandnigger under their breath.

And that's the funniest shit I must say. :forcedsmile:
Yeahs hes a dirty arab, kangz push the muh black jesus horse shit lol
 
jesus was black
 
Whether or not you believe in his divinity, all historians agree that there’s overwhelming evidence to prove that he did exist as a person.

Now, as for his race, was Jesus white? It depends on your definition of white.

He was middle eastern and so he certainly was tan and dark haired. Even then, some people could still consider him white.

Some only consider nordics white, some stretch that to Southern Europeans and Slavs… while others include Turks and Mediterraneans as whites too, depends who you ask.

Jesus had a caucasoid skull and olive skin. Similar to this man for example:

View attachment 1831430

Is he white? In brazil he’d certainly be considered white. It depends.


There is literally no contemporary historical evidence for the biblical figure Jesus. He is a 100% Christian-invented lie. Only Christian scholars say there was any evidence for his existence, the majority of the world's people believe he is fake

Also, middle eastern need not imply dark hair or tan. There are light skinned, blue eyed DNA-sequenced remains from Israel ca. 6000 years ago, and many Hebraic figures from the old testament are described as ruddy skinned and red haired, including David and Esau.

Nevertheless, in my opinion, if Jesus had existed he would probably have looked like Dennis Rodman, since executed iconoclasts with violent criminal histories have tended to be Subsaharan Africans throughout history.
 
Last edited:
Yes Jesus was really white, fool.
 
Caucasian? Yes. White? Maybe...
 
There is literally no historical evidence for the biblical figure Jesus.
Yes there is. He isn’t only mentioned in the bible, there are multiple records of his existence from various ancient texts. For exemple; Jewish Rabbis of the time calling him a charlatan and Roman government officials documenting about him.

He was an internationally prominent figure at the time, and lots of different m people wrote about him. He isn’t some made up character that only showed up on one book. There’s overwhelming evidence that he existed.

You can’t deny that. Just like you can’t deny that Buddha existed because you aren’t Buddhist or that the prophet Muhamed existed because you don’t believe in Islam. They were all historical figures who had a following in real life and left behind a legacy.
 
Yes there is. He isn’t only mentioned in the bible, there are multiple records of his existence from various ancient texts. For exemple; Jewish Rabbis of the time calling him a charlatan and Roman government officials documenting about him.

No, not a single one of these instances was contemporary, they were all from hundreds of years after he was supposedly killed. Also they only mention a guy named "Jesus" in passing and they never talk about any details of him. It would be like a "record" of Americans from the year 2022 talking about some guy named "John" who was executed in 1800. It proves nothing.


He was an internationally prominent figure at the time,


:lul::lul::lul:


Said literally no source ever. There's no contemporary record of Jesus.


and lots of different m people wrote about him. He isn’t some made up character that only showed up on one book. There’s overwhelming evidence that he existed.

Yes he was. There's no evidence he ever existed. It's all make-believe.


You can’t deny that. Just like you can’t deny that Buddha existed because you aren’t Buddhist or that the prophet Muhamed existed because you don’t believe in Islam. They were all historical figures who had a following in real life and left behind a legac

Unlike Jesus they were described by contemporary people. Earliest mentioning of "Jesus" in history is from like 200 AD and it's only a Roman talking about Christ worshippers.
 
 
He was a jew.
 
 

Similar threads

A
Replies
2
Views
67
Avertion
A
D
Replies
17
Views
141
romanstock
romanstock
M
Replies
28
Views
226
MoggerVPN
M

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top