We native americans are NOT mongoloids

[yandex99]

we are our own race.

we are equally distant or close to asians and europeans,and that is only because of yakut mixture in asians,or we'd be closer to europeans among all basal eurasians.

asians have wierd facial proportions,different eyes(hunter masculine vs almond feminine like ours),different teeth,different builds,different maxilla protrusions or lack of it,wide faces,different bodily proportions etc

 

[Deleted member 48595]

are polynesians asian

 

[Deleted member 23558]

yea it makes no sense for ANE which was basal caucasoid to become mongoloid just cos they crossed the land bridge

 

[N8verBegan]

Yeah they look more caucasoid tbh

 

[Deleted member 23558]

View attachment 2862770
Yeah they look more caucasoid tbh

some pinkoids just saw them and got so mogged and then made them seperate classification, uhh actually brooo their cheekbones are so big and brow ridge is so huge and light brown skin so theyre mongolian low impulse control animals brooo, but i think it may also depend on the tribe. La sioux for example were definite cacuasian

 

[ALLIWANTISTJD]

They are not mongoloid but they are close to mongoloid or have some similarities with mongoloids, just like how australoids and melanesians are closer to africans but they are their own race

 

[Deleted member 48595]

They are not mongoloid but they are close to mongoloid or have some similarities with mongoloids, just like how australoids and polynesians are closer to africans but they are their own race

I thought polynesians was mongoloid?

 

[ALLIWANTISTJD]

I thought polynesians was mongoloid?

Sorry I meant melanesians

 

[yandex99]

They are not mongoloid but they are close to mongoloid or have some similarities with mongoloids, just like how australoids and melanesians are closer to africans but they are their own race

no,our eyes are the only common thing and we have almond eyes mostly,while asians have hunter eyes,so not even that in most cases.

since both R indo europeans and Q native americans according to population Geneticists descend from P australoids.the ancestor of both indo europeans and natives probabely looked like a angular faced papuan.


Native americans do not downwind from eastasians nor are they related to them.

phenotypically Margids and Silvids are fully caucasoid,albeit a bit more primitive.its how the early caucasoids would have looked in fact.its how cromagnons would have looked aswell.natives have high angular protruding cheekbones wich are different from mongoloid low set fat feminine cheekbones.theyre slight slanted eyes are due to good orbital formation and not fat pads below the eyes like asians with their retruded maxillas.

Native american bone structure is caucasoid just more developed +Primitive(other caucasoids degenerated due to their neolithic diets and lifestyles but early european skulls all look native american).


only Brazilids and some pampids and pacifids look mongoloid,but only pacifids are mongoloid in skull shape and they have a wierd genetic mutation different then other amerindians.Brazilids are a relatively new type and just look like austronesians because of their greater neotenization anbd humidity adapted looks.

Lagids look more robust and primitive and caucasoid.you can see it as a derivative of australoid looks.

this is caucasoid,all northern natives(Like me).

 

[MaghrebGator]

I'm with you on this one Little Arrow

 

[Deleted member 21716]

no,our eyes are the only common thing and we have almond eyes mostly,while asians have hunter eyes,so not even that in most cases.

since both R indo europeans and Q native americans according to population Geneticists descend from P australoids.the ancestor of both indo europeans and natives probabely looked like a angular faced papuan.


Native americans do not downwind from eastasians nor are they related to them.

phenotypically Margids and Silvids are fully caucasoid,albeit a bit more primitive.its how the early caucasoids would have looked in fact.its how cromagnons would have looked aswell.natives have high angular protruding cheekbones wich are different from mongoloid low set fat feminine cheekbones.theyre slight slanted eyes are due to good orbital formation and not fat pads below the eyes like asians with their retruded maxillas.

Native american bone structure is caucasoid just more developed +Primitive(other caucasoids degenerated due to their neolithic diets and lifestyles but early european skulls all look native american).


only Brazilids and some pampids and pacifids look mongoloid,but only pacifids are mongoloid in skull shape and they have a wierd genetic mutation different then other amerindians.Brazilids are a relatively new type and just look like austronesians because of their greater neotenization anbd humidity adapted looks.

Lagids look more robust and primitive and caucasoid.you can see it as a derivative of australoid looks.View attachment 2863357

View attachment 2863359

this is caucasoid,all northern natives(Like me).

who is this mogger

 

[yandex99]

we're exotic caucasoids(caucasoids with more archaic and developed facial features aswell as more feminine maxillas and eyes).

 

[sudanguy]

phenotypically Margids and Silvids are fully caucasoid,albeit a bit more primitive.its how the early caucasoids would have looked in fact.its how cromagnons would have looked aswell.natives have high angular protruding cheekbones wich are different from mongoloid low set fat feminine cheekbones.theyre slight slanted eyes are due to good orbital formation and not fat pads below the eyes like asians with their retruded maxillas.

Just like Richard who was Silvid + Mediterranid

Lots of phenotypes have “Mongolian” looking eyelids

The Natives, Baltids (particularly the Savolaxids)

and Nilotids (especially the women)

all have mongolian eye shapes kind of

 

[yandex99]

View attachment 2863366View attachment 2863370View attachment 2863372
Just like Richard who was Silvid + Mediterranid

Lots of phenotypes have “Mongolian” looking eyelids

The Natives, Baltids (particularly the Savolaxids) and Nilotids all have mongolian eye shapes kind of

no,that's just hooding.asians have hunter eyes,we have more narrow almond shaped eyes and much smaller.asians have fat pads keeping their bulging eyes from popping out of their recessed skull.we don't.

theres a difference between almond eyes(feminine),and hunter eyes(masculine,asian).

 

[yandex99]

View attachment 2863366View attachment 2863370View attachment 2863372
Just like Richard who was Silvid + Mediterranid

Lots of phenotypes have “Mongolian” looking eyelids

The Natives, Baltids (particularly the Savolaxids)

View attachment 2863383
and Nilotids (especially the women)

View attachment 2863385
all have mongolian eye shapes kind of

richard ramirez was margid and meditereanid not silvid.I'm margid and mediterennean too.

 

[Deleted member 21716]

no,that's just hooding.asians have hunter eyes,we have more narrow almond shaped eyes and much smaller.asians have fat pads keeping their bulging eyes from popping out of their recessed skull.we don't.

theres a difference between almond eyes(feminine),and hunter eyes(masculine,asian).

aren't narrow shaped eyes masc though?

 

[yandex99]

aren't narrow shaped eyes masc though?

no,almond eyes will always be more narrow than round eyes yet it's still hyperfeminine.big round eyes are also feminine but not as much,and less exotic(a feminine principle).

just look at these eyes

 

[Deleted member 21716]

no,almond eyes will always be more narrow than round eyes yet it's still hyperfeminine.big round eyes are also feminine but not as much,and less exotic(a feminine principle).

just look at these eyes

bro she looks trans

also narrow eyes with no uee and proper eye support is a masc trait

women usually have rounder, larger eyes than men with uee

 

[sudanguy]

richard ramirez was margid and meditereanid not silvid.I'm margid and mediterennean too.

No he was Silvid. Margid looks nothing like him and Silvids were tall with robust bodies just like him

 

[yandex99]

View attachment 2863392View attachment 2863393
No he was Silvid. Margid looks nothing like him and Silvids were tall with robust bodies just like him

lol that morph is bullshit.

Margids were tall and robust and also have more aquiline features.

his ancestry isn't silvid lmao....baja california natives are margids and lagids.

this is a comanche who's mum is a white captive(comanche had alot of spaniard concubines,later they went after nordic women),you would say he's silvid but I'd say he's half nordic and half margid mix..silvids are on the east coast and plains.

ute-comanche derived languages like the aztecs are margids from utah.not plains.

 

[Phanese]

we are our own race.

we are equally distant or close to asians and europeans,and that is only because of yakut mixture in asians,or we'd be closer to europeans among all basal eurasians.

asians have wierd facial proportions,different eyes(hunter masculine vs almond feminine like ours),different teeth,different builds,different maxilla protrusions or lack of it,wide faces,different bodily proportions etc

DNA testing shows & lumps Asians & Native together. Asians & Natives are the only ones with shoveled incissors so no you guys dont have different teeth.
Both hairless with the strong cheekbones. Natives are even more hairless than Asians. Some Natives, like inuits, look very east Asian because they migrated from Siberia & the Natives that dont look like that migrated from South East Asia like where would be Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodian, Vietnam, Laos. Many Native cheifs just look like old Asian men to me.

Above^^ Is an old Thai man. Look at the ressemblance to Natives

The only reason why older pics of Natives look like moggers were because of better diet, eating hard foods for jaw development & low carbs for low facial fat.

Native now look like overweight filipinos, thai men.