We need a reliable tinder testing method and need to test everything 1 by 1 like scientists to see what traits really cause the most matches

D

Deleted member 17829

Fuchsia
Joined
Feb 16, 2022
Posts
10,145
Reputation
15,984
We need to find a way to test things on tinder(gonna be hard now that they've done that thing where u need to verify urself)

And test everything indivudally and cut out all variables like scientists.

for example testing height by inch with the same pics and seeing how over each height is

or testing same pics but with a facial scar morphed on him or tattoos or with hollow cheeks etc(these are random examples)

then compile all the data to see how powerful each feature really is
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard, PushingTheLimits and LooksmaxxHopeful
There’s variables that can’t be controlled like location (there’s differences in preferences between cities in the same country), and previous tinder accounts created causing shadowbans
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard, LooksmaxxHopeful and Deleted member 16677
Just smile bro
 
There’s variables that can’t be controlled like location (there’s differences in preferences between cities in the same country), and previous tinder accounts created causing shadowbans
I would pick a nearby city where the variables wouldnt be so much different. and try find similar population.

and i'd use a different IP from IP spoofing software and different device(probably use bluestacks android simulator on desktop to simulate a new device every time)


I might do this myself tbh.

this guy told us how to verify with chadfish pics.

Anyone got any idea what things we should test first?
 
  • +1
Reactions: akira and LooksmaxxHopeful
I would pick a nearby city where the variables wouldnt be so much different. and try find similar population.

and i'd use a different IP from IP spoofing software and different device(probably use bluestacks android simulator on desktop to simulate a new device every time)


I might do this myself tbh.

this guy told us how to verify with chadfish pics.

Anyone got any idea what things we should test first?
You need to register with your phone number though. The phone number tied to your account gets shadowbanned, not the IP
 
You need to register with your phone number though. The phone number tied to your account gets shadowbanned, not the IP
Both get banned i think. And even easier to get a new phone number.
 
Not possible even if you got a new phone number for each account. Once you get 99+ likes it's impossible to know how the exact number beyond that afaik, one profile could have 100 likes and another could have 500 and you would have no way of knowing. You can't rely on matches to figure out that number because you would need to buy premium in order to even swipe enough to match with that many people unless you want to keep having to wait for the cooldown.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard
Just get a new SIM card for each tinder experiment jfl
i could get them pretty cheap. or find a way to buy numbers online
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful
Not possible even if you got a new phone number for each account. Once you get 99+ likes it's impossible to know how the exact number beyond that afaik, one profile could have 100 likes and another could have 500 and you would have no way of knowing. You can't rely on matches to figure out that number because you would need to buy premium in order to even swipe enough to match with that many people unless you want to keep having to wait for the cooldown.
or we could test how long it would take to get 99+ matches. or use a lower smv guy who will still get matches, but not 99+ really fast and then change the variables and maybe see it go from 31 matches in 24 hours in 1 city. then 58 matches in 24 hours in another city after changing a variable
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16801 and LooksmaxxHopeful
It’s just the algorithm, a 6/10 guy would get 80% the right swipes of a 8/10 guy, but the 8/10 gets shown to 20x the users, which then leads to more swipes, which puts his profile even higher in the stack. It’s a snowball effect. Tinder experiments are only useful for evaluating how useful tinder is, not for evaluating SMV in the real world or on more unbiased apps
 
1000% agreed, people will argue with the method (women on tinder might not represent the general female population, etc. etc. and other objections you could make) but it's literally the only way that you can make an empirical argument about this sort of stuff, and it's (relatively) quick and can be carried out by random lookism newbs, it would solve arguments really fast showing what does and does not matter (and to what relative extent)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17829
or we could test how long it would take to get 99+ matches. or use a lower smv guy who will still get matches, but not 99+ really fast and then change the variables and maybe see it go from 31 matches in 24 hours in 1 city. then 58 matches in 24 hours in another city after changing a variable
Retarded because that is affected by other factors and randomness. A chadlite could get more than a chad in an hour just because during that hour there were more women on their phones swiping.
 
Retarded because that is affected by other factors and randomness. A chadlite could get more than a chad in an hour just because during that hour there were more women on their phones swiping.
Well we could pick a certain time and day of the week to do it at
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful
Well we could pick a certain time and day of the week to do it at
Some cities have larger userbases. There are too many factors even if you do your best to account for all of them your results won't be reliable enough.

The whole idea that you could somehow accurately pinpoint which specific trait is the most important is retarded in of itself because you would need to ensure all other variables are the same and aren't accounting for facial harmony and other factors. Pretty much the only way to pinpoint the trait would be to use the exact same photos of the same face for each experiment just morphed to have certain features. If you use different people for each experiment there's no way of knowing for sure if it was X feature that gave him more success or if it was Y combination or something else on his face.

Scientists do this with a reliable sample size and an accurate control group, this just isn't feasible. All you need to know is a chad will get more than a chadlite, a chadlite will get more than a HTN, a HTN will get more than a normie etc.
 
Some cities have larger userbases. There are too many factors even if you do your best to account for all of them your results won't be reliable enough.

The whole idea that you could somehow accurately pinpoint which specific trait is the most important is retarded in of itself because you would need to ensure all other variables are the same and doesn't account for facial harmony and other factors. Pretty much the only way to pinpoint would be to use the exact same photos of the same face for each experiment just morphed to have certain features. If you use different people for each experiment there's no way of knowing for sure if it was X feature that gave him more success or if it was something else on his face.

Scientists do this with reliable sample size and an accurate control group, this just isn't feasible. All you need to know is a chad will get more than a chadlite, a chadlite will get more than a HTN, a HTN will get more than a normie etc.
Thats why I said we would pick a nearby city with the same population.

and yes that is the plan. exact same photos with morphed variable
 
UK chadfishing not looking good so far bro. only got 5 likes. 3 matches, 2 bitches in dms tho.
 
isn’t there enough studies on male attractiveness?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top