we need to bring back government sponsored plastic surgery

[Enfant terrible]

Yes, once the government was blackpilled enough to recognize the deepest ill in society was physical unattractiveness.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1927899/

A 10-year study of the effects of reconstructive surgery on selected inmates in a British Columbia provincial prison is described. It is proposed that physical defects can be dominant causes of crime, and that the correction of facial defects in inmates of a penal institution can effect a striking improvement in their conduct during imprisonment, and make them more confident on re-entry into society. This survey, covering 450 patients operated on in a 10-year period, demonstrates a marked decrease in the rate of criminal recidivism.

 

[Need2Ascend]

Why not just accept who you are and be happy?

 

[Enfant terrible]

Why not just accept who you are and be happy?

 

[CFW432]

Watch out, moonblunt might flame you and say that you don't deserve it and you should die alone and not a single cent of tax payer money (like that prettyboy faggot actually pays taxes ) should go to helping you. Meanwhile at the same time not seeing a problem about how cucked it is that taxpayer money also helps fund welfare programs that have single mother programs to help raise chads spawn, thereby making cucks out of the entire male populace.

 

[NONE]

I heard about this several years ago, perhaps around five years ago.

 

[NONE]

Plastic surgery has a troubled history inside prisons. Some advocates want it to make a comeback.

Should cosmetic procedures be part of how society prepares prisoners to reenter it?

www.motherjones.com

he wondered whether there was a more insidious bias at play: the applicants’ attractiveness.

Chaiwat tested his theory, sending digitally beautified mugshots and unedited mugshots to 450 companies, alongside questionnaires annotated with variables like salary expectations and career experience. The results blew him away. Employers were substantially more likely to hire the photoshopped applicants for under-the-table jobs, and favored them even more for jobs in the formal economy. The touched-up candidates also received higher salary offers.

Today, the so-called beauty premium begins at birth.
His follow-up study included the job seekers’ criminal records alongside photos. Employers once again selected the more attractive applicants (except when they had records of violence and drug offenses). Chaiwat published the data in 2021 in Thailand and the World Economy Journal. His research, he wrote, supported previous economic studies around the globe that found that “more attractive workers are more economically successful” and concluded that “cosmetic surgery [can] provide the positive impact to ex-prisoners’ success of re-entry.”

This suggestion may seem unorthodox. But consider how deeply lookism is entrenched in cultures the world over. In biblical times, people with facial scars, asymmetry, eczema, and other “deformities” were barred from entering the holy temple, lest their presence profane it. This bigotry was a precursor to the physiognomy and phrenology movements of the 18th and 19th centuries, a racist pseudoscience that suggested physical traits like a large nose or prominent brow (traits often associated with people of color) signified “innate criminality.”

shorter sentences in the courtroom. People deemed conventionally good-looking are fined less for serious misdemeanors and are less likely to be arrested in the first place. Signifiers of beauty extend well beyond a person’s genetics. Tailored clothes, gleaming hair, glowing skin, and straight teeth—even eyelash length—all contribute to the impression of someone’s overall attractiveness, and all exist beyond an unbreachable wealth gap for many.