we need to make a new rating system

Deleted member 21192

Deleted member 21192

this place fucking sucks
Joined
Aug 1, 2022
Posts
404
Reputation
369
PSL system only applies here on this autistic aspie forum
can we get a FemAle Gaze rating system (capitals are the acronym we will use)
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: subhuman to mtn, mfk, Cheesyrumble and 5 others
How will it rate faces?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Danish_Retard, Stopping@Nothing19 and Deleted member 17791
How will it rate faces?
Rhaast kayn alter version

rate new psl system :soy:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17791
i have a genius idea actually. we base the SMV rating on the last female someone has interacted with romantically
 
PSL system only applies here on this autistic aspie forum
can we get a FemAle Gaze rating system (capitals are the acronym we will use)
I feel like I have a pretty good understanding of the female gaze. Some normies are really bad at it though. Some normies have no idea what a chad looks like. Wheat waffles is not even that good at identifying what a chad is tbh he's okay but not spot on. I was watching this youtuber gerbert johnson and he has a pretty shit idea of what a chad looks like even though he makes good points otherwise his understanding of the female gaze kinda sucks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zoom759 and Oberyn
I feel like I have a pretty good understanding of the female gaze. Some normies are really bad at it though. Some normies have no idea what a chad looks like. Wheat waffles is not even that good at identifying what a chad is tbh he's okay but not spot on. I was watching this youtuber gerbert johnson and he has a pretty shit idea of what a chad looks like even though he makes good points otherwise his understanding of the female gaze kinda sucks.
can you enlighten me? (serious)
what is a chad in a female gaze?
give me like measurement type stuff
I'm assuming narrow ish jaw (FWHR isnt much), good skin, good hair
 
PSL system only applies here on this autistic aspie forum
can we get a FemAle Gaze rating system (capitals are the acronym we will use)
I'm still wondering what "female gaze" means.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Danish_Retard
can you enlighten me? (serious)
what is a chad in a female gaze?
give me like measurement type stuff
I'm assuming narrow ish jaw (FWHR isnt much), good skin, good hair
This is the peak of male looks
GettyImages 607398944 1014x1024
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Oberyn
I'm still wondering what "female gaze" means.
female gaze means what women find attractive.

Male gaze means what men think women like
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard and Deleted member 12002
I'm still wondering what "female gaze" means.
male gaze is the "muhh fwhr has to be 3 lower third has to be 3x the size of my forehead and gonions and masseter have to be massivE!!!"

female gaze prefer soft features or some shit like that
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 12002
female gaze means what women find attractive.

Male gaze means what men think women like
Oh, but how do you measure female gaze on a site like this?
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 17791
By looking at tinder experiments and tic tocs and shit. PSL is already on the right track, it still has autism in it though.


That is ideal
PSL has severe autism in it, that's why it isn't ready yet
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17791
PSL has severe autism in it, that's why it isn't ready yet
It's still better than 90% of ratings men come up with in rating other men.

It only starts to break down at the extreme high levels where you look like a gay alien.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ErbCel
This issue with all the scales is that after a given point attraction becomes highly subjective. It is really easy to tell who is a subhuman or who is a Chad. It is also quite easy to tell who is the biggest subhuman in between two incels. However, determining who is the chaddiest Chad in between two Chads? That's way harder. Why? Because attractiveness to the female gender can depend on multiple factors including age, level of femininity, ethnic group, interests and mood.
This is why so many people try to bring down the PSL system by saying many features that are regarded as important are autistic. I believe PSL is right on many points, it's just that the scale truly works for masculine or maesthetic males more than anything.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Danish_Retard, Oberyn and Deleted member 21192
This issue with all the scales is that after a given point attraction becomes highly subjective. It is really easy to tell who is a subhuman or who is a Chad. It is also quite easy to tell who is the biggest subhuman in between two incels. However, determining who is the chaddiest Chad in between two Chads? That's way harder. Why? Because attractiveness to the female gender can depend on multiple factors including age, level of femininity, ethnic group, interests and mood.
This is why so many people try to bring down the PSL system by saying many features that are regarded as important are autistic. I believe PSL is right on many points, it's just that the scale truly works for masculine or maesthetic males more than anything.
this is what im saying.
the issue is that PSL is built around masculine male archetype when there are other archetypes
 
  • +1
Reactions: ErbCel
this is what im saying.
the issue is that PSL is built around masculine male archetype when there are other archetypes
Sure, but imagine the complexity of actually creating a scale that can rate people according to multiple archetypes. It would be really complicated to achieve. Also, scientific studies point towards the fact that masculine (but not ultra masculine) men do best for one night stands. I do however agree with the sentiment that pretty boys are vastly underrated but that's just how male envy works.
I have a proposal, we could keep the PSL scale but add letters that will determine how close someone looks compared to the ideal male representation of a given archetype. So for example we would have 6.5 PSL MASC as a rating.
 
Sure, but imagine the complexity of actually creating a scale that can rate people according to multiple archetypes. It would be really complicated to achieve. Also, scientific studies point towards the fact that masculine (but not ultra masculine) men do best for one night stands. I do however agree with the sentiment that pretty boys are vastly underrated but that's just how male envy works.
I have a proposal, we could keep the PSL scale but add letters that will determine how close someone looks compared to the ideal male representation of a given archetype. So for example we would have 6.5 PSL MASC as a rating.
yeah this would be a better solution
 
can you enlighten me? (serious)
what is a chad in a female gaze?
give me like measurement type stuff
I'm assuming narrow ish jaw (FWHR isnt much), good skin, good hair
I'm not great at putting it into words and there aren't like scientific measurements I use. I can just tell by looking at the dude if he would be successful. A lot of it has to do with harmony and it's not all about masculine features obviously but a good sharp jawline (preferably on the wider side) is definitely one of the masculine traits that women like in a guy. Obviously good skin and good hair are important but it really depends on how the individual looks and how well their features blend together
 
It's still better than 90% of ratings men come up with in rating other men.

It only starts to break down at the extreme high levels where you look like a gay alien.
Tbh we don't need to get rid of PSL we just need to fix it. There is a certain threshold/range where having a high PSL is ideal and once it gets too high you start looking like a gay alien. You might be able to be a runway model because gay aliens are unique looking but it's not what women will find attractive and lust over.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17791
Thats a little boy with droopy eyes and makeup tf lmao
Tbh we don't need to get rid of PSL we just need to fix it. There is a certain threshold/range where having a high PSL is ideal and once it gets too high you start looking like a gay alien. You might be able to be a runway model because gay aliens are unique looking but it's not what women will find attractive and lust over.
Chico has ideal smv
 
Chico has ideal smv
Chico isn't the greatest looking dude of all time. I mean he's good looking but tbh if you showed most girls a pic of him they'd just be like "yeah he's attractive" but they wouldn't really freak out or anything. His face isn't perfect his nose could definitely be better and there's something about his eyes that aren't as good as other models
 
Chico isn't the greatest looking dude of all time. I mean he's good looking but tbh if you showed most girls a pic of him they'd just be like "yeah he's attractive" but they wouldn't really freak out or anything. His face isn't perfect his nose could definitely be better and there's something about his eyes that aren't as good as other models
 
guy wants to rate looks using a binary system jfl
 

What does this prove? He is in a shithole muslim country and he is famous. If he was some random dude walking down the street in the west nobody would do this
 
What does this prove? He is in a shithole muslim country and he is famous. If he was some random dude walking down the street in the west nobody would do this
>shithole muslim country
>france

Alright, I think it's time to end this conversation.
 
>shithole muslim country
>france

Alright, I think it's time to end this conversation.
France has become a shithole muslim country lmaoo not my fault Europe let in all the refugees. Either way it was muslim women simping for him there and that's no the point anyway, he is famous. If he wasn't famous and he was nobody and he walked down the street in the US none of this would happen.
 
Sure, but imagine the complexity of actually creating a scale that can rate people according to multiple archetypes. It would be really complicated to achieve. Also, scientific studies point towards the fact that masculine (but not ultra masculine) men do best for one night stands. I do however agree with the sentiment that pretty boys are vastly underrated but that's just how male envy works.
I have a proposal, we could keep the PSL scale but add letters that will determine how close someone looks compared to the ideal male representation of a given archetype. So for example we would have 6.5 PSL MASC as a rating.
Great idea, actually.
There are 2 more scale options

1. I would suggest introducing a separate scale from 0 to 10 for average appearance, of which most on this site are for better. That is, on a scale of minus, people with pronounced defects and deformities immediately leave. At 10+, lightchads and chads, prettyboys and models immediately leave, that is, maximizing their appearance will already be useless, since they already have great success with girls. 0-10 will be made up of people with average appearance, where 10 are already near-lighted, and 0 are on the verge of subhyuman. Why is this done? For a better ranking and representation of guys about their appearance. For many in the standard system, 5-6-7 is unclear, it is not clear what will allow them to jump from 5 to 6 and how this will affect interaction with the opposite sex. Here it will be more obvious, for example, in the scale for average people, due to small changes, he was able to jump from 5 to 7. It will be more visual and intuitive

2. Stretching the standard scale from 0-10 to 0-100 for a more accurate understanding of improving your appearance. Why is this necessary? Because there is a misunderstanding of what is the big difference between 2 and 3 or 6 and 7. Stretching the scale will allow you to give a better understanding of how the glow up affects the appearance

Moreover, it would be nice to develop a universal system for evaluating one's appearance, which will be based on the rarity of appearance, symmetry, the severity of t traits (if we are talking about guys who t max) or prettyboys traits, skin color, eyes, hair, etc.

In the same case, it will be important to provide a scale for smv, because it is very important for t max boys to have a muscular body and the style of bad guys
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: ErbCel
Why are we still coping with this gaze or that gaze. Women and men both agree on what looks good on both genders if they dont cope
 
Why are we still coping with this gaze or that gaze. Women and men both agree on what looks good on both genders if they dont cope
we agree from like 0 to 6, however 6 to 10 we are still inaccurate on
 
6 to 10 is normie rating and shoudlny exist. 7 numbers are enough to fill the scale with every looks tier.
1psl = trucel
2psl = incel
3psl = low tier normie
4psl = mid tier normie
5psl = high tier normie
6psl = chad
7psl = gigachad

Replace with beckie, stacy, tyrone, chang, chaddam, chadpreet, tommy, mochtaba, chadhano for different genders and races
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
9
Views
240
sorbetist
S
Edgarpill
Replies
21
Views
1K
IncelJihadist
IncelJihadist
N
Replies
16
Views
176
copemaxxeer
C
PrimalPlasty
Replies
39
Views
432
PrimalPlasty
PrimalPlasty

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top