We wuz spiritually Gods nd shieeeet

[Klassek]

We wuz spiritually smart nd shiet

 

[unknownincel]

we wuz everything

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

We wuz spiritually smart nd shiet

Drippy asf ngl

Pinks like you wish you looked as good as him and had his drip

Neanderthal DNA makes one ugly subhuman evil and uncreative. Human DNA makes one Dark, beautiful, sexy and drippy

Pinks like you need to get on board

 

[Vrilltrum]

We wuz spiritually smart nd shiet

we wuz naZES and shiet

 

[Jason5000]

dem africans could fly nd shieet until wypipo chained dem and took away dey magic powa

 

[unconsolation]

but i did have breakfast this morning?

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

dem africans could fly nd shieet until wypipo chained dem and took away dey magic powa

Your race is the retarded one making Argartha edits

Pot calllinf the kettle black

 

[Klassek]

dem africans could fly nd shieet until wypipo chained dem and took away dey magic powa

they wuz laik Wakanda
befur ze wypipo came

 

[Jason5000]

Your race is the retarded one making Argartha edits

Pot calllinf the kettle black

agrtha is obvioisly fiction. Black people cant comprehend the difference between reality and fiction

 

[Klassek]

agrtha is obvioisly fiction. Black people cant comprehend the difference between reality and fiction

bro you forgot they iz anunaki nd shiet they was the trees, the sun and shieeeet

 

[Jason5000]

bro you forgot they iz anunaki nd shiet they was the trees, the sun and shieeeet

Afrika is the god of the creation nd shieet

 

[Valkyrjaj]

To call yourself Young God is cringe asf ngl

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

agrtha is obvioisly fiction. Black people cant comprehend the difference between reality and fiction

The fact that you idiots make edits on it and speak about it so highly says otherwise

You faggots are so mentally ill and depraved you fags really believe in Nordic alien memes even the Nazis believed in that esoteric nonsense

Blacks are grounded in truth we don’t need bullshit as we are perfect as it is. But you pink cave demons are always crashing the way out like bitches over some ISH

Anyways I’m done arguing. You guys are not gonna exist in 200 years anyways based on how your birthdates is going lol

 

[Klassek]

The fact that you idiots make edits on it and speak about it so highly says otherwise

You faggots are so mentally ill and depraved you fags really believe in Nordic alien memes even the Nazis believed in that esoteric nonsense

Blacks are grounded in truth we don’t need bullshit as we are perfect as it is. But you pink cave demons are always crashing the way out like bitches over some ISH

You’re so retarded that you can’t tell satire from non, but it’s okay cuz you was anunaki nd shiet whole nother race nd shiet

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

The fact that you idiots make edits on it and speak about it so highly says otherwise

You faggots are so mentally ill and depraved you fags really believe in Nordic alien memes even the Nazis believed in that esoteric nonsense

Blacks are grounded in truth we don’t need bullshit as we are perfect as it is. But you pink cave demons are always crashing the way out like bitches over some ISH

Anyways I’m done arguing. You guys are not gonna exist in 200 years anyways based on how your birthdates is going lol

"I'm done arguing" after your opponent made one point you are coping your bloodline will end first inkwell

Agharta edits are satire making fun of schizos who drink Mercury

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

"I'm done arguing" after your opponent made one point you are coping your bloodline will end first inkwell

Agharta edits are satire making fun of schizos who drink Mercury

He had no point

He mayosplained just as you’re doing now

I find it fruitless to converse with my inferiors. Your pink frail and pale the earth gets hotter and you get weaker. Your women have 0 kids your going extinct and mass immigration is replacing you

Why bother arguing with one whose destiny is sealed

 

[unstable]

Drippy asf ngl

Pinks like you wish you looked as good as him and had his drip

Neanderthal DNA makes one ugly subhuman evil and uncreative. Human DNA makes one Dark, beautiful, sexy and drippy

Pinks like you need to get on board

I am pro BNWO and support the hotep kangs in their takeover of mayos but technically

Non blacks have more Homo Sapien Dna than blacks.

Blacks are at 82-96% due to ghost population
Whites are at 98% due to neanderthals.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

I am pro BNWO and support the hotep kangs in their takeover of mayos but technically

Non blacks have more Homo Sapien Dna than blacks.

Blacks are at 82-96% due to ghost population
Whites are at 98% due to neanderthals.

lol

Not even true

That is from a sequential data set that mapped it out saying the absolute highest end that could be possible is 19%

HOWEVER it hovers in reality between 0-4% for actual west African populations

And that’s another thing, west Africans are not ALLL BLACKS I know you lot lack geographic common sense so I have to teach you this as well.

So blacks are the only race with 100% humans yes THE ONLY ONE so it’s accurate for me to mock you all for being subhumans literally as blacks a are the only race tested to be 100% humans 0 non human admixture

Now you can go take your misunderstood dataset bullshit you didn’t even bother to read (I read the report) elsewhere

 

[Klassek]

lol

Not even true

That is from a sequential data set that mapped it out saying the absolute highest end that could be possible is 19%

HOWEVER it hovers in reality between 0-4% for actual west African populations

And that’s another thing, west Africans are not ALLL BLACKS I know you lot lack geographic common sense so I have to teach you this as well.

So blacks are the only race with 100% humans yes THE ONLY ONE so it’s accurate for me to mock you all for being subhumans literally as blacks a are the only race tested to be 100% humans 0 non human admixture

Now you can go take your misunderstood dataset bullshit you didn’t even bother to read (I read the report) elsewhere

yeah 100% human and live in mud huts, can’t recover from what happened 200 years ago and live off the white government

nice cope

 

[4'11 roman]

We wuz spiritually smart nd shiet

boyooo i am a black woman in america superheroes donts got shiiii on me

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

yeah 100% human and live in mud huts, can’t recover from what happened 200 years ago and live off the white government

nice cope

Neanderthallin out, why are you honking out ? I get it’s getting hot outside but there’s no need for it to be making you go coo coo, just go inside put some sun screen on so you don’t burn like a bitch when you step outside okay then you won’t be having a mayo meltdown ain’t that right wonderbread warrior ?

 

[unstable]

lol

Not even true

That is from a sequential data set that mapped it out saying the absolute highest end that could be possible is 19%

HOWEVER it hovers in reality between 0-4% for actual west African populations

And that’s another thing, west Africans are not ALLL BLACKS I know you lot lack geographic common sense so I have to teach you this as well.

So blacks are the only race with 100% humans yes THE ONLY ONE so it’s accurate for me to mock you all for being subhumans literally as blacks a are the only race tested to be 100% humans 0 non human admixture

Now you can go take your misunderstood dataset bullshit you didn’t even bother to read (I read the report) elsewhere

Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations - PMC

Multiple West African populations inherited genes from a population that diverged before modern humans and Neanderthals split.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

yeah and Whites carry less neanderthal than that 4%

The population surveyed are yoruba and mende both are black

No they aren't 100% humans.

We provide complementary lines of evidence for archaic introgression into four West African populations. Our analyses of site frequency spectra indicate that these populations derive 2 to 19% from an archaic population that diverged before the split of Neanderthals and modern humans

Yoruba and the Mende populations.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Recovering signals of ghost archaic introgression in African populations - PMC

Multiple West African populations inherited genes from a population that diverged before modern humans and Neanderthals split.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

yeah and Whites carry less neanderthal than that 4%

The population surveyed are yoruba and mende both are black

No they aren't 100% humans.

Their logic is roughly:


observed genetic pattern → test demographic models → model involving gene flow from a deeply diverged population fits better → infer that archaic introgression is a possible explanation.


So 2–19% is an inference from a model, not something they directly counted by identifying 19% of a person’s genome as archaic.



And the 19% isn’t “West Africans are 19% archaic”


The paper gives a posterior estimate for one model of approximately 11%, with a 95% highest-posterior-density interval of 4.5–19%. The authors then combine their results across populations and report a broader 2–19% range.


That’s much more nuanced than:


“Scientists discovered that West Africans have 2–19% archaic DNA.”


The actual claim is closer to:


Under the demographic model that the authors fit to the observed genetic patterns, the inferred contribution from a hypothetical deeply diverged archaic population is estimated to fall within roughly 2–19%.


That’s an estimated ancestry parameter, not a direct measurement of identifiable archaic DNA.


There’s another major caveat


The authors themselves explicitly say:


“the true underlying demographic model is likely to be more complex.”


They also discuss alternative demographic models that can produce similar patterns.


That’s extremely important because the fundamental problem is identifiability.


If you observe an unusual pattern in modern genomes, there can be multiple historical explanations for it:


Model A:
Modern humans + unknown archaic population → gene flow → present-day West Africans


Model B:
Complex population structure within Africa → ancestral population subdivision → present-day West Africans


Model C:
Some combination of ancient population structure + migration + gene flow.


The authors favour their archaic-introgression model because it fits their data better, but that isn’t equivalent to possessing a fossil or genome proving that the mystery population existed and contributed exactly X% of ancestry.


So if someone is using this to say “West Africans are 19% archaic”


That’s a massive oversimplification.

A more scientifically accurate criticism would be:


“The 2–19% figure isn’t a directly observed percentage of archaic DNA. The study inferred an archaic-admixture proportion by fitting demographic models to patterns in modern African genomes. Because the proposed archaic population has never been directly sampled and the inference depends on assumptions about ancient population history, 19% is an upper end of the model’s inferred ancestry range—not a direct measurement showing that modern West Africans possess 19% identifiable archaic DNA.”


And importantly, the authors themselves describe the result as “poorly understood” and call for caution about the underlying demographic complexity.


TLDR: IM RIGHT AGAIN

 

[Klassek]

Neanderthallin out, why are you honking out ? I get it’s getting hot outside but there’s no need for it to be making you go coo coo, just go inside put some sun screen on so you don’t burn like a bitch when you step outside okay then you won’t be having a mayo meltdown ain’t that right wonderbread warrior ?

Lmao, Dnr my whole argument and proceed to insults what a retard just shows you have no valid standing

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

OOGA BOOGA BOOOGA OOOGA BOGGA BOGGA BOOO OOOGA BOOO BOOOOO

Sorry I don’t speak Cavebeast

 

[Klassek]

Sorry I don’t speak Cavebeast

Are you satire?
i see you have a orthodox monk as your profile picture no blackie would have that, or is that another one of your “humour”

 

[unstable]

Their logic is roughly:


observed genetic pattern → test demographic models → model involving gene flow from a deeply diverged population fits better → infer that archaic introgression is a possible explanation.


So 2–19% is an inference from a model, not something they directly counted by identifying 19% of a person’s genome as archaic.



And the 19% isn’t “West Africans are 19% archaic”


The paper gives a posterior estimate for one model of approximately 11%, with a 95% highest-posterior-density interval of 4.5–19%. The authors then combine their results across populations and report a broader 2–19% range.


That’s much more nuanced than:


“Scientists discovered that West Africans have 2–19% archaic DNA.”


The actual claim is closer to:


Under the demographic model that the authors fit to the observed genetic patterns, the inferred contribution from a hypothetical deeply diverged archaic population is estimated to fall within roughly 2–19%.


That’s an estimated ancestry parameter, not a direct measurement of identifiable archaic DNA.


There’s another major caveat


The authors themselves explicitly say:


“the true underlying demographic model is likely to be more complex.”


They also discuss alternative demographic models that can produce similar patterns.


That’s extremely important because the fundamental problem is identifiability.


If you observe an unusual pattern in modern genomes, there can be multiple historical explanations for it:


Model A:
Modern humans + unknown archaic population → gene flow → present-day West Africans


Model B:
Complex population structure within Africa → ancestral population subdivision → present-day West Africans


Model C:
Some combination of ancient population structure + migration + gene flow.


The authors favour their archaic-introgression model because it fits their data better, but that isn’t equivalent to possessing a fossil or genome proving that the mystery population existed and contributed exactly X% of ancestry.


So if someone is using this to say “West Africans are 19% archaic”


That’s a massive oversimplification.

A more scientifically accurate criticism would be:


“The 2–19% figure isn’t a directly observed percentage of archaic DNA. The study inferred an archaic-admixture proportion by fitting demographic models to patterns in modern African genomes. Because the proposed archaic population has never been directly sampled and the inference depends on assumptions about ancient population history, 19% is an upper end of the model’s inferred ancestry range—not a direct measurement showing that modern West Africans possess 19% identifiable archaic DNA.”


And importantly, the authors themselves describe the result as “poorly understood” and call for caution about the underlying demographic complexity.


TLDR: IM RIGHT AGAIN

literally Tomato Tomato level argument.

It is an educated estimate by modelling African genome that africans have between 2-19% archaic ancestry non human ancestry.
No need to do mental gymnastics by downplaying this study but muhhh unsampled population muhhh not accurate. It isn't supposed to be accurate this is why the estimate is so large (2-19%) with two being lower and 19% being upper level estimate.

You are not right lol africans still aren't 100% homo sapiens ask you AI model that then lol.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

A BAGGA BOOO OGGA BOOGA BUGGGA OOOGA OGG UGG IGGH UGGG BOOOOGA BOOOOALOOPADEE DOOOP BOO OGG AH

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

literally Tomato Tomato level argument.

It is an educated estimate by modelling African genome that africans have between 2-19% archaic ancestry non human ancestry.
No need to do mental gymnastics by downplaying this study but muhhh unsampled population muhhh not accurate. It isn't supposed to be accurate this is why the estimate is so large (2-19%) with two being lower and 19% being upper level estimate.

You are not right lol africans still aren't 100% homo sapiens ask you AI model that then lol.

The 2–19% is an inferred admixture parameter under their model. But saying “19% is the upper estimate, therefore Africans have up to 19% archaic ancestry” leaves out the critical qualification: the entire inference depends on the demographic model and the assumption that the unusual genetic patterns are best explained by introgression from this unsampled population.

You’re arguing against something I didn’t say. I never said the study didn’t produce an estimate. I said 2–19% is a model-derived estimate, not a direct measurement showing that Africans possess 2–19% identifiable “non-human DNA.” The proposed donor population wasn’t sampled, which is precisely why it’s called a ghost population. The study infers its existence and contribution from patterns in modern genomes under a particular demographic model. it’s literally the distinction between an inference from a demographic model and a directly observed genetic measurement.

So yes blacks are the only race that’s 100% bonified bono sapien. Does that mean every black is ? Nope but we sure are the only ones with members within our race that are 100% humans. Can you say the same ? Nope


Good now sit down like a good lil girl and learn your place when your human overlord speaks, Caveman.

 

[unstable]

The 2–19% is an inferred admixture parameter under their model. But saying “19% is the upper estimate, therefore Africans have up to 19% archaic ancestry” leaves out the critical qualification: the entire inference depends on the demographic model and the assumption that the unusual genetic patterns are best explained by introgression from this unsampled population.

You’re arguing against something I didn’t say. I never said the study didn’t produce an estimate. I said 2–19% is a model-derived estimate, not a direct measurement showing that Africans possess 2–19% identifiable “non-human DNA.” The proposed donor population wasn’t sampled, which is precisely why it’s called a ghost population. The study infers its existence and contribution from patterns in modern genomes under a particular demographic model. it’s literally the distinction between an inference from a demographic model and a directly observed genetic measurement.

So yes blacks are the only race that’s 100% bonified bono sapien. Does that mean every black is ? Nope but we sure are the only ones with members within our race that are 100% humans. Can you say the same ? Nope


Good now sit down like a good lil girl and learn your place when your human overlord speaks, Caveman.

No one ever said that blacks are 19% non humans it is just an upper level maximum possible estimate.
Purposeful distortion of my argument.

Yes cuz the ghost population hasn't been found so we can't sample them and compare simple.
This inference is trying to model african genome and infer how much non sapien dna they could have and the range for that is 2-19%

Find me one black person with 100% homo sapien ancestry.

I probably have more human dna than you.

Even with this estimate the lowest possible estimate is 2% literally the same as neanderthal admixture in whites even then slightly more.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

No one ever said that blacks are 19% non humans it is just an upper level maximum possible estimate.
Purposeful distortion of my argument.

Yes cuz the ghost population hasn't been found so we can't sample them and compare simple.
This inference is trying to model african genome and infer how much non sapien dna they could have and the range for that is 2-19%

Find me one black person with 100% homo sapien ancestry.

I probably have more human dna than you.

Even with this estimate the lowest possible estimate is 2% literally the same as neanderthal admixture in whites even then slightly more.

Either way it doesn’t matter. Blacks are the only ones that are closest to it so sit your pink ass down ok lil buddy ok ? OK BUDDYYY yeah.!

I do agree it’s the same as Neanderthals in whites which is 2% that’s true but who cares so what some blacks have it I’m sure others don’t. The true blck humans will carry the torch for us over the tainted ones. But honestly in skeptical over it all, we need more tests done imo to confirm it etc. having a couple datasets on this shit just doesn’t make me convinced. I only believe you faggots are Neanderthals cos of how diff you look to the OG humans and the extensive research on it to the point you can’t argue against it anymore

 

[unstable]

Either way it doesn’t matter. Blacks are the only ones that are closest to it so sit your pink ass down ok lil buddy ok ? OK BUDDYYY yeah.!

I do agree it’s the same as Neanderthals in whites which is 2% that’s true but who cares so what some blacks have it I’m sure others don’t. The true blck humans will carry the torch for us over the tainted ones. But honestly in skeptical over it all, we need more tests done imo to confirm it etc. having a couple datasets on this shit just doesn’t make me convinced. I only believe you faggots are Neanderthals cos of how diff you look to the OG humans and the extensive research on it to the point you can’t argue against it anymore

Nigga I am not huwite

Except khoi san most blacks have archaic dna.

How do og humans look according to you