Weirdest eye area ever

Volksstaffel

Volksstaffel

Lisan al Gaib of looksmaxxing
Joined
Jul 23, 2024
Posts
13,200
Reputation
76,483
14373


She has them x eyes
14375
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: grav, hypernormie, MrMaxwell and 21 others
Lookin like gally from maze runner :lul::lul:

IMG 0291
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: grav, Raimaxxing, MrMaxwell and 12 others
Htb
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: negativ_canthalshit, Volksstaffel and dex0bp
poor development because of poor diet and no physical activity
1. Genetics

Further down

2. Diet and habits





And wayyyy lower





3. Physical activity
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: soapbubble, Kara and DnrGriffith
1. Genetics

2. Diet and habits











3. Physical activity
Believe it or not You’d be surprised of how much of your eye area you can change during development. This eye area is not caused by bad genetics but more environmental factors like diet and lack of physical activity. Sure you can say Genetics do play a part but if she had a good diet and did physical activity her eye area would be 5x better than thiss
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: tension
Believe it or not You’d be surprised of how much of your eye area you can change during development. This eye area is not caused by bad genetics but more environmental factors like diet and lack of physical activity. Sure you can say Genetics do play a part but if she had a good diet and did physical activity her eye area would be 5x better than thiss
You’re just saying things without anything to base it off of

I don’t feel like going down a rabbit hole, but genetics determine what you decide to eat and what physical activity you decide to do

My main point tho was that physical activity doesn’t matter much when it comes to your facial development
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: sub5_poopcel and Volksstaffel
Believe it or not You’d be surprised of how much of your eye area you can change during development. This eye area is not caused by bad genetics but more environmental factors like diet and lack of physical activity. Sure you can say Genetics do play a part but if she had a good diet and did physical activity her eye area would be 5x better than thiss
Retarded take
 
  • +1
Reactions: soapbubble, BeanCelll and tension
You’re just saying things without anything to base it off of

I don’t feel like going down a rabbit hole, but genetics determine what you decide to eat and what physical activity you decide to do

My main point tho was that physical activity doesn’t matter much when it comes to your facial development
Genetics dont determine what food you eat. Thats gotta be the dumbest thing ever. Do your reaearch. And yes physical activity matters whether its combat sports or athletic sports. First off if you’re fat you wont have as much natural GH during puberty/development so you need to lose weight and physical activities can help meaning? More prominent growth which you need for bones n height. Also boxing puts mechanical stress on your skull because you’re literally getting hit in the head (other words > getting bonesmashed by someone else)
Retarded take
its not.
 
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: soapbubble and tension
Good counterpoint
Genetics dont determine what food you eat. Thats gotta be the dumbest thing ever.
Your brain is genetic, therefore all the decisions you make are technically genetic
First off if you’re fat you wont have as much natural GH during puberty/development so you need to lose weight and physical activities can help meaning? More prominent growth which you need for bones n height. Also boxing puts mechanical stress on your skull because you’re literally getting hit in the head (other words > getting bonesmashed by someone else)
You think female supermodels were doing boxing to look they way they do :lul::lul::lul::lul:
 
Good counterpoint

Your brain is genetic, therefore all the decisions you make are technically genetic

You think female supermodels were doing boxing to look they way they do :lul::lul::lul::lul:
Genetics influence decisions but they dont determine all of them. Its just stupid. They can influence emotions and the way you react but they dont determine what decisions you do. Do your research.

You cannot use female supermodels as argument for this as they are the most genetically gifted + good diet. Female supermodels are 0.1% of women. You realize that right?

Also he just said “retarded take” but didnt further elaborate on that. So why are you coming at me for saying “no its not?”
 
Do your research.
What research have you done that disproves my point
Genetics influence decisions but they dont determine all of them. It’s just stupid.
What determines the cutoff :lul:
They can influence emotions and the way you react but they dont determine what decisions you do.
Women are designed to react on emotions more than men
You cannot use female supermodels as argument for this as they are the most genetically gifted + good diet.
Almost like that’s what actually matters :feelspepo::feelspepo:
Also he just said “retarded take” but didnt further elaborate on that. So why are you coming at me for saying “no it’s not?”
You could explain as to why it’s not a retarded take
 
What research have you done that disproves my point
identical twins have almost the same genetics yet they
• make different choices
• develop different personalities
• end up with different lives
If decisions were purely genetic they would probably be able to know what one another was thinking because of “genetic based decision making” as you call it. But they dont.
What determines the cutoff :lul:
There is no cutoff because decisions dont come from one source
Almost like that’s what actually matters :feelspepo::feelspepo:
Uhh no because you’re comparing a fraction of the female population to every female in general. Logic doesnt apply
You could explain as to why it’s not a retarded take
sure. If what you say was true then
• learning wouldnt change behavior
• discipline wouldnt exist
• regret wouldnt make sense because “you couldnt have done otherwise”

But all of those clearly exist.
 
Uhh no because you’re comparing a fraction of the female population to every female in general. Logic doesnt apply
you literally said that supermodels are the way they are because of genetics and diet

and then now you're saying that it only applies to them since they're supermodels :lul::lul:
identical twins have almost the same genetics yet they
• make different choices
• develop different personalities
• end up with different lives
If decisions were purely genetic they would probably be able to know what one another was thinking because of “genetic based decision making” as you call it. But they dont.
they don't have the exact same genetics tho :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
sure. If what you say was true then
• learning wouldnt change behavior
• discipline wouldnt exist
• regret wouldnt make sense because “you couldnt have done otherwise”

But all of those clearly exist.
he was saying your original post was retarded wtf are you talking abt :feelshaha::feelshaha:
 
Yes she is rather unsightly
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Volksstaffel
you literally said that supermodels are the way they are because of genetics and diet
Supermodels are one in a (idk how many people but alot). You think that comes from genetics only? No genetics played a massive and important part but that wouldnt be possible without a diet. Theres a limit for genetics. Supermodels have superior genes in terms of aesthetics and looks. Their limit is higher but they would never be able to reach that by eating junk food everyday. Your genetics are your playing cards (even if they arent good playing cards). The diet is how you use them. And thats up to you whether you wanna use your playing cards the best way not “genetics”
they don't have the exact same genetics tho :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Ofc they dont. Otherwise they’d be the same person. What im saying is they have very identical genetics to one another. But yet they are still different because genetics doesnt determine decision making.
If genetics fully determined decisions, two people with identical genes in identical situations would always make the same choice. But even identical twins don’t.

Let me ask you a question:

Do you believe a person can ever choose differently than their first impulse?

I’d really like to know because your answer would tell me alot
 
Supermodels are one in a (idk how many people but alot). You think that comes from genetics only? No genetics played a massive and important part but that wouldnt be possible without a diet. Theres a limit for genetics. Supermodels have superior genes in terms of aesthetics and looks. They’re limit is higher but they would never be able to reach that by eating junk food everyday. Your genetics are your playing cards (even if they arent good playing cards). The diet is how you use them.
Are you retarded? I've been saying that both genetics and diet are important this whole time

Never once did I say that diet didn't matter

I was saying that physical activity didn't matter as much as you said it did

Don't put words in my mouth
Ofc they dont. Otherwise they’d be the same person. What im saying is they have very identical genetics to one another. But yet they are still different because genetics doesnt determine decision making.
If genetics fully determined decisions, two people with identical genes in identical situations would always make the same choice. But even identical twins don’t.
Because they don't have identical genes :lul::lul:
Let me ask you a question:

Do you believe a person can ever choose differently than their first impulse?

I’d really like to know because your answer would tell me alot
Yes people can choose differently than their first impulse

I think you're misunderstanding my point tho

Genetics determine your first impulse, but also if you decide to act on it, and what you actually end up doing

Your brain is the way it is because of genetics, you can't change the way your brain works

Everything you do is basically predetermined
 
Are you retarded? I've been saying that both genetics and diet are important this whole time

Never once did I say that diet didn't matter

I was saying that physical activity didn't matter as much as you said it did

Don't put words in my mouth

Because they don't have identical genes :lul::lul:

Yes people can choose differently than their first impulse

I think you're misunderstanding my point tho

Genetics determine your first impulse, but also if you decide to act on it, and what you actually end up doing

Your brain is the way it is because of genetics, you can't change the way your brain works

Everything you do is basically predetermined
First off. You start off by calling me a “retard” this shows you have lack of emotional maturity:lul:

Second. “You cant change the way your brain works” this is just factually wrong

The brain changes constantly. This is basic neuroscience:

•learning a skill changes neural pathways
•forming habits rewires responses
•therapy can change emotional reactions
•training self-control literally strengthens different circuits

That’s called neuroplasticity. What is neuroplasticity?

In simple terms > your brain rewiring itself and creating new pathways/neurons from mistakes, learning, forming new habits, and trauma. This wouldnt be possible if genetics determined decision making. But it is. Which tells us? Genetics dont determine decision making. Simple.


If the brain can change, then decisions are not fully predetermined at birth by genetics.
 
Higher smv then the whole of org btw. Clav is the exception
 
  • Nerd
Reactions: Volksstaffel
Are you retarded? I've been saying that both genetics and diet are important this whole time

Never once did I say that diet didn't matter

I was saying that physical activity didn't matter as much as you said it did

Don't put words in my mouth

Because they don't have identical genes :lul::lul:

Yes people can choose differently than their first impulse

I think you're misunderstanding my point tho

Genetics determine your first impulse, but also if you decide to act on it, and what you actually end up doing

Your brain is the way it is because of genetics, you can't change the way your brain works

Everything you do is basically predetermined
You just contradicted yourself. If everything is predetermined, there’s no such thing as overriding an impulse. The fact that you admit people can do that proves decisions aren’t fully locked by genetics.
 
>< eyes
 
  • +1
Reactions: Volksstaffel
First off. You start off by calling me a “retard” this shows you have lack of emotional maturity:lul:

Second. “You cant change the way your brain works” this is just factually wrong

The brain changes constantly. This is basic neuroscience:

•learning a skill changes neural pathways
•forming habits rewires responses
•therapy can change emotional reactions
•training self-control literally strengthens different circuits

That’s called neuroplasticity. What is neuroplasticity?

In simple terms > your brain rewiring itself and creating new pathways/neurons from mistakes, learning, forming new habits, and trauma. This wouldnt be possible if genetics determined decision making. But it is. Which tells us? Genetics dont determine decision making. Simple.


If the brain can change, then decisions are not fully predetermined at birth by genetics.
You just contradicted yourself. If everything is predetermined, there’s no such thing as overriding an impulse. The fact that you admit people can do that proves decisions aren’t fully locked by genetics.
giphy.gif


you clearly don't understand what i'm saying

you never wouldn't learned that skill, formed that habit, gone to therapy, trained self-control, if your genetics weren't written for you to do those things

everything being predetermined doesn't mean that you can't override an impulse, as it's apart of the predestination

you were never actually going to act on that original impulse, you were always going to do something different
 
giphy.gif


you clearly don't understand what i'm saying

you never wouldn't learned that skill, formed that habit, gone to therapy, trained self-control, if your genetics weren't written for you to do those things

everything being predetermined doesn't mean that you can't override an impulse, as it's apart of the predestination

you were never actually going to act on that original impulse, you were always going to do something different
If every possible action is always predetermined and there is no possible way to act otherwise, then your claim can’t be tested or proven wrong. That makes it an assumption, not a conclusion.

If what your saying is true then
If i picked

Option A: that was predetermined
Option B: also predetermined
If i do none of the above and change my mind completely: that was also predetermined.

Seems like somethings not adding up.
 
If every possible action is always predetermined and there is no possible way to act otherwise, then your claim can’t be tested or proven wrong. That makes it an assumption, not a conclusion.

If what your saying is true then
If i picked

Option A: that was predetermined
Option B: also predetermined
If i do none of the above and change my mind completely: that was also predetermined.

Seems like somethings not adding up.
I guess you can’t comprehend predestination

Those options never existed

You were always gonna pick the one you decided on
 
  • +1
Reactions: Volksstaffel
I guess you can’t comprehend predestination

Those options never existed

You were always gonna pick the one you decided on
Saying ‘other options never existed’ doesn’t change anything. No matter what someone does, you’ll still say it was the only possible outcome. That means your claim can’t be tested or used to explain behavior. it just re-labels it.
 
Saying ‘other options never existed’ doesn’t change anything. No matter what someone does, you’ll still say it was the only possible outcome. That means your claim can’t be tested or used to explain behavior. it just re-labels it.
I mean yeah I never said there’s a way to prove what I’m talking abt

It’s just a belief that you can decide to agree or disagree with

It’s kinda demoralizing but it’s also pretty logical imo
 
I mean yeah I never said there’s a way to prove what I’m talking abt

It’s just a belief that you can decide to agree or disagree with

It’s kinda demoralizing but it’s also pretty logical imo
Yes you were

At the start you were presenting it like it was how things actually work. Now you’re saying it’s just a belief. Those aren’t the same. You’re shifting from a factual claim, to an opinion.

one needs evidence, the other doesn’t.

It seems to me you realized the contradiction in your own words, hence why you shifted from a factual claim to an opinion.

A quick piece of advice: its kind of hard to win a debate, when you havent done any research.

Not only that, but you dont win a debate, by calling someone a retard. That tells me, you are emotionally immature, and you switch to insults, the moment it gets hard for you

(also a sign of low iq).

Calling me a retard doesnt further help your case. It just signals to the opposing individual how weak you are mentally.
 
Yes you were

At the start you were presenting it like it was how things actually work. Now you’re saying it’s just a belief. Those aren’t the same. You’re shifting from a factual claim, to an opinion.

one needs evidence, the other doesn’t.

It seems to me you realized the contradiction in your own words, hence why you shifted from a factual claim to an opinion.

A quick piece of advice: its kind of hard to win a debate, when you havent done any research.

Not only that, but you dont win a debate, by calling someone a retard. That tells me, you are emotionally immature, and you switch to insults, the moment it gets hard for you

(also a sign of low iq).

Calling me a retard doesnt further help your case. It just signals to the opposing individual how weak you are mentally.
I’m not tryna debate you buddy :lul::lul:

You just said something that wasn’t true

I told you that you were wrong (multiple people agreed with me)

And then the whole topic started changing

All that really matters is that physical activity doesn’t matter when it comes to the development of a females eye area

Didn’t think that you’d disagree this much on something that’s pretty agreed on
 
I’m not tryna debate you buddy :lul::lul:

You just said something that wasn’t true

I told you that you were wrong (multiple people agreed with me)

And then the whole topic started changing

All that really matters is that physical activity doesn’t matter when it comes to the development of a females eye area

Didn’t think that you’d disagree this much on something that’s pretty agreed on
We were talking about eye area from the start. But you’re still oversimplifying it.

Genetics determine the structure, but things like body fat, circulation, and overall health still affect how the eye area looks. And how do you lose body fat and increase blood circulation? By doing physical activity.


Physical activity isn’t the main factor, but saying it doesn’t matter at all isn’t accurate either.

Also people “agreeing” with you doesnt further strengthen your argument. Thats a stupid argument

Agreement only tells you:

What people believe

Not necessarily what is true

People can agree on something that is
Incorrect
Oversimplified
Based on social media assumption
Or just repeated misinformation

What matters is whether the claim is actually accurate. Not what people think
 
Genetics determine the structure, but things like body fat, circulation, and overall health still affect how the eye area looks.
Genetics determine your fat distribution around your eyes which matters more than total body fat when it comes to the aesthetics of the eye area

Also, even if she had perfect habits now, that wouldn’t change the fact that her eyes are horrid

She’s also clearly not fat so idk why you even brought that up

I can’t even think straight rn cuz I’m tired asf but can you give me any sort of evidence of proof that physical activity will have an effect on the eye area

I mean it’s literally all bone, fat distribution, eye color, and lashes

Idk how you think physical activity would do anything
Also people “agreeing” with you doesnt further strengthen your argument. Thats a stupid argument

Agreement only tells you:

What people believe

Not necessarily what is true

People can agree on something that is
Incorrect
Oversimplified
Based on social media assumption
Or just repeated misinformation

What matters is whether the claim is actually accurate. Not what people think
I mean it’s common sense

Just show me something that goes along with what ur saying

Like I’ve said a bunch, physical activity isn’t gonna do anything
 
Genetics determine your fat distribution around your eyes which matters more than total body fat when it comes to the aesthetics of the eye area

Also, even if she had perfect habits now, that wouldn’t change the fact that her eyes are horrid

She’s also clearly not fat so idk why you even brought that up

I can’t even think straight rn cuz I’m tired asf but can you give me any sort of evidence of proof that physical activity will have an effect on the eye area

I mean it’s literally all bone, fat distribution, eye color, and lashes

Idk how you think physical activity would do anything

I mean it’s common sense

Just show me something that goes along with what ur saying

Like I’ve said a bunch, physical activity isn’t gonna do anything
You’re right that bone structure and eye shape are mostly genetic. But I never said exercise changes that.:lul:

Appearance isn’t only structure.

Body fat, fluid retention, circulation, sleep, and stress all affect how the eye area looks. Physical activity influences those factors indirectly, so it can affect appearance even if it doesn’t change the underlying anatomy.

Im not going to continue arguing on this however. believe what you want to believe. Im not going to continue trying to convince you to something you’re clearly stubborn on.
 
And you’re talking abt me switching up :lul::lul::lul:
Believe it or not You’d be surprised of how much of your eye area you can change during development. This eye area is not caused by bad genetics but more environmental factors like diet and lack of physical activity. Sure you can say Genetics do play a part but if she had a good diet and did physical activity her eye area would be 5x better than thiss
Ahhhh would you look at that. Your cheap and dirty tricks dont work.

Sorry. Try again.
 
dont take things out of context. Did you ever read and see where i said “during development”

I dont think so.
I mean that’s the first thing you commented under the thread
Ahhhh would you look at that. Your cheap and dirty tricks dont work.

Sorry. Try again.
This post doesn’t make ur case any better

You’re literally saying that she doesn’t have a horrible eye area because of genetics, but instead due to a bad diet and not exercising. You have ZERO clue what her diet was and what physical activity she did so ur going based off of NOTHING

Also, saying that her eye area would be 5x better if she just ate a better diet (which you don’t know) and did physical activity (which you also don’t know if she did) is LAUGHABLE

Even if she had a bad diet and didn’t do much exercise, 5 TIMES better is such an outrageous statement
 
I mean that’s the first thing you commented under the thread

This post doesn’t make ur case any better

You’re literally saying that she doesn’t have a horrible eye area because of genetics, but instead due to a bad diet and not exercising. You have ZERO clue what her diet was and what physical activity she did so ur going based off of NOTHING

Also, saying that her eye area would be 5x better if she just ate a better diet (which you don’t know) and did physical activity (which you also don’t know if she did) is LAUGHABLE

Even if she had a bad diet and didn’t do much exercise, 5 TIMES better is such an outrageous statement
I meant 5 times better during development. And yes you’re right i have no clue what her diet was and if she did physical activity but i can get a pretty good assumption based off of her facial projection and her skin quality.

And i said genetics play a big part. But again you’re not reading. Just taking things out of context.

heres a shorter version you maybe would like to read since you clearly have a problem reading what im saying

“Her eye area is mostly genetic yes but good diet and physical activity during development would make it 5x better and while im unaware of what her diet and physical activity is im basing it off of as if she had a poor diet and no physical activity. yes that is an assumption but im making an “if” example if the given situation was her having a poor diet and no physical activity.”


Sounds better for you?

Anyways im going to sleep and i wont continue this conversation. Dont bother replying.
 
I meant 5 times better during development. And yes you’re right i have no clue what her diet was and if she did physical activity but i can get a pretty good assumption based off of her facial projection and her skin quality.

And i said genetics play a big part. But again you’re not reading. Just taking things out of context.

heres a shorter version you maybe would like to read since you clearly have a problem reading what im saying

“Her eye area is mostly genetic yes but good diet and physical activity during development would make it 5x better and while im unaware of what her diet and physical activity is im basing it off of as if she had a poor diet and no physical activity. yes that is an assumption but im making an “if” example if the given situation was her having a poor diet and no physical activity.”


Sounds better for you?

Anyways im going to sleep and i wont continue this conversation. Dont bother replying.
Worst rebuttal I’ve ever seen :lul::lul:

It’s over bro

0 credibility whatsoever

All points invalid
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: sub5_poopcel

Similar threads

ecstazy
Replies
6
Views
51
Bitchwhipper2
Bitchwhipper2
Charles.vals
Mogs Eye area
Replies
9
Views
65
VeryFuglyNiyguhs
VeryFuglyNiyguhs
goontang
Replies
23
Views
105
SkiSquadJPG
SkiSquadJPG
Lorence
Replies
3
Views
42
Trevor Wonter
Trevor Wonter
davidlaidisme67
Replies
3
Views
24
Sub->CL
Sub->CL

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top