D
Deleted member 18582
Poet laureate of the deep state
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2022
- Posts
- 16,134
- Reputation
- 15,448
In previous times in Europe did they factor looks in at all or was it all just status
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Exceptions, not all Nobles had congenital deformities!
You can't name one noble who was said to be beautiful, but was also a male.Exceptions, not all Nobles had congenital deformities!
The environment back then was fucked so there were probably 0 Chads, if there was, they would be picked up and used by the royal family and we would know about them.Exceptions, not all Nobles had congenital deformities!
Peter the great was 6’7 but I don’t know if that counts.You can't name one noble who was said to be beautiful, but was also a male.
6'7, he was probably an ogrePeter the great was 6’7 but I don’t know if that counts.
He was just attractive enough to benefit from his height.6'7, he was probably an ogre
Henry VIII in his youthYou can't name one noble who was said to be beautiful, but was also a male.
Bugeyed, high set eyebrows, loose hyoid skin, probably overweight, saved by his heightHe was just attractive enough to benefit from his height.
View attachment 2257843
I think nobles tended to be uglier than commoners bc they were under 0 selective pressure for looks. Normie relationships are driven by sexual attraction and looks.You can't name one noble who was said to be beautiful, but was also a male.