What are NPC traits?

NPCs stagnate past 18
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: gimpygunk and Xangsane
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: gimpygunk and Xangsane
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 42218
In terms of looks, job, career, education, personality, hobbies, interests, etc.
@chaddyboi66 am I one?
No.

Your looks are above average and your pheno/colouring is non-standard in the place you're living in, not to mention you seem very non-NT at least here anyway.

Hobbies and interests seem pretty non-standard too, and while I don't necessarily agree with the running joke here that you're actually "autistic", I do still think you're quite non-NT.

Your Job/career and education are all pretty standard though, but that's only aside from maybe the fact of how most normies just aren't willing to put in the time/effort you were for your profession in particular.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Xangsane
No.

Your looks are above average and your pheno/colouring is non-standard in the place you're living in, not to mention you seem very non-NT at least here anyway.
I see lots of people with dark hair and blue eyes but my skin colour and facial features are different even if the white people are tan.
Hobbies and interests seem pretty non-standard too, and while I don't necessarily agree with the running joke here that you're actually "autistic", I do still think you're quite non-NT.
I have been diagnosed with level 1 autism.
Your Job/career and education are all pretty standard though, but that's only aside from maybe the fact of how most normies just aren't willing to put in the time/effort you were for your profession in particular.
Thank you!

Why do I seem non NT? Would you say it's my looks and personality that make me a non NPC?
 
  • +1
Reactions: chaddyboi66
In terms of looks, job, career, education, personality, hobbies, interests, etc.
face below 8/10, height below 6.3 feet. Does not have a logical type of thinking. That's all (although just logical thinking is enough)
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Tabula Rasa, LampPostPrime and Xangsane
face below 8/10, height below 6.3 feet. Does not have a logical type of thinking. That's all (although just logical thinking is enough)
I'm 5'9. it's over.
 
I see lots of people with dark hair and blue eyes but my skin colour and facial features are different even if the white people are tan.
Yes, I was referring more to your pheno than colouring as even in the UK there are quite a few people with light eyes and dark hair.

I have been diagnosed with level 1 autism.
My condolences.

I'm not even being ironic or trying to be rude when I say that.
Thank you!

Why do I seem non NT? Would you say it's my looks and personality that make me a non NPC?

Both.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
Yes, I was referring more to your pheno than colouring as even in the UK there are quite a few people with light eyes and dark hair.


My condolences.

I'm not even being ironic or trying to be rude when I say that.


Both.
I think it's because my facial ratios and features are different!!!
 
  • +1
Reactions: chaddyboi66
looks: NCT eyes. soulless, it's like a literal NPC from a video game is looking at you
job: retail/fast food business. most boring and skill less jobs there is
personality: INTJ. most NPC and incel personality
hobby: cooking. most bland hobby on the planet.
interests: video games. do i even need to explain
"About 2.1% of the population have an INTJ personality type"
 
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime
"About 2.1% of the population have an INTJ personality type"

I've said it before but I think you're an INFJ @Xangsane, though you could also be something else as far as I know- which I don't.

Don't ask me why I know I because I don't remember, and it's still probably somewhere in another one of your older MBTI related threads anyway.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
I've said it before but I think you're an INFJ @Xangsane, though you could also be something else as far as I know- which I don't.

Don't ask me why I know I because I don't remember, and it's still probably somewhere in another one of your older MBTI related threads anyway.
Do I look infj?
 
  • +1
Reactions: chaddyboi66
Do I look infj?

If I had to guess just based on my intuition alone I'd say maybe, but then again I really wouldn't know.


Judging MBTI based solely on the way someone looks would border on physiognomy and pseudoscience as a result.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime and Xangsane
If I had to guess just based on my intuition alone I'd say maybe, but then again I really wouldn't know.


Judging MBTI based solely on the way someone looks would border on physiognomy and pseudoscience as a result.
I love vultology!
 
  • +1
Reactions: chaddyboi66
I should preface this post by stating how it only took me a few minutes to write all of this, but I actually wrote it a few hours ago almost immediately after your reply in anticipation of you possibly asking me "why" again.

Much to my own surprise, be it for better [sparing me the time/effort required to detail a reply like this one] or worse [rendering all the time/effort moot*], you didn't. *[moot- In this context used as the Americans/Yanks would say, albeit incorrectly as compared to its actual correct usage in British law of course]
I love vultology!
I assume you didn't do this either simply out of consideration for the fact that I explicitly told you not to ask me why, or just because you found my previous answer satisfactory.

Unlike most here I actually mind it when you ask why, but then again it's not like I look forward to it either. I think most people get a little too annoyed at a simple request to just elaborate on the points the they actually brought up themselves, and one would rightfully expect someone to be able to back up what they say if they bother mentioning it.

I can see why people would get annoyed though when considering this forum's infamous reputation for having horrible attention spans and low tolerance for any lengthy content, though I do suppose it's not that unlike anywhere else online these days either. To be clear though I'm only telling you not to ask why in this instance, and I'm not telling you to stop saying it in general as I don't think you should.


Nonetheless, I sat on this post for the next few hours as it was mostly finished except for the last part [which would only take a minute or two to type out once I finished my other tasks at hand], and because I was already preoccupied with something else.

Finishing this post right then and there would require me to either have to multitask when doing something else [as in something more important than merely rotting on Looksmax], and/or dedicating more than 10 minutes of my time on a low effort post which is an unofficial principle I abide by [not spending more than 10 minutes of a low effort post that is].

I'll still post it though since doing so causes no significant harm to my post-rep ratio, it'll act as a net positive addition to my overall post count so I can reach a higher colour like Red, and not doing so after writing so much would be just a waste despite still not actually taking that long to type out.


Debut.​

If I had to guess just based on my intuition alone I'd say maybe, but then again I really wouldn't know.

Judging MBTI based solely on the way someone looks would border on physiognomy and pseudoscience as a result.
In case you ask me why I think that...

Don't.

Don't ask why I think that since it's just based off my intuition, and as you probably know intuition isn't something that can necessarily be explained in the way [I assume] you're probably hoping for [via scientific reasoning]. However, even with that said it [my intuition or "gut feeling"] is still probably accurate to some degree here [as it usually is].

Normally I wouldn't bother going into such detail about something like this [what I'm about to mention regarding MBTI; not the whole "why" thing I said earlier], especially when I've already said I wouldn't, but I also really just don't want to have to do [explain] this again. Besides, I also understand that you can't properly convince someone of something without proper reasoning, evidence, or even just an explanation for either of the former.

An example [which is also the only example] I'll use to prove my point could be the fact that you constantly dig for an answer as to why or how exactly something is/works rather than just accepting the fact that it simply is/does, which demonstrates how you're probably not an INTJ and are instead possibly an INFJ like I guessed.

The manner in which something works/is shouldn't matter as opposed to the fact it just simply does/is, and the recognition of this fact is a typical characteristic of an INTJ's reasoning as opposed to an INFJ who desires to understand it.

That said, this barely covers surface level differences between the two and I'd recommend looking more into cog-functions [as opposed to just muh mbti bro muh xxxx 16 personality zodiac shit innit] if you're really that interested, though I won't bother [doing that] myself since I not only provided you with an example already but also linked resources that go into it further with more [examples].



Maybe you were anticipating the fact I'd just explain this core difference for both you and everyone else here anyway [like with these videos], and maybe you were right. Maybe I was already anticipating you would anticipate me to do this, and maybe I was simply going to play along with it so as to just not have to do it again later anyway [when both you & everyone else inevitably forget again].

Maybe I could be wrong in either of these assumptions [you possibly being an INFJ and/or you anticipating I'd just end up explain why anyway] as they're both only but one of many different paths of actions you could [though also probably would] have taken in this situation [respectively], but then again maybe I've also found a way to make the best of even this and still save face.

However, in any case- even in[/...cluding] the one that isn't [the case where I'm right]...
I could always just play it off as a simple mistake, or pass it off as just a joke [when I was in fact being serious].
I could always simply just save face by gaslighting everyone into thinking I'm somehow right if I rely on my forum reputation [for whatever it's worth] for plausible credibility, or throw around some unintelligible word salad filled with various overly lengthy and "smart" sounding words until people just assume I'm right even if I don't necessarily believe so myself and/or they don't even know why [they think I'm right themselves].
I could always just take the more shameless route and direct everyone's attention away from my error by distracting them with native forum memes/humour, or even just by throwing around familiar terms/relatable buzzwords in a way most people could misinterpret as genuine banter.
I could always just entertain the audience by eviscerating or make fun of someone, thereby making it seem as if I still somehow "won" in the end against some unrelated strawman by attacking the character of this new unrelated target instead of the actual arguments of the initial target of interest, since I know most people's conveniently low attention spans here are quite easy to exploit [most tend to forget in less than a week anyway].


Fin.
Or maybe I'd instead just go back to whatever initial task I was doing before I started procrastinating on this forum like I often [regrettably] do.
 
  • Love it
  • Woah
Reactions: Xangsane and LampPostPrime
 
I love vultology!
I also think you could maybe be INFJ because you come off as a bit of an idealist, or even like the "big blue boy scout" in terms of overall moral character [though he's an ISFJ if I'm not mistaken].

Most people here tend to either not bother and shed away with the idea of being good or even outright reject it by trying so hard to be the opposite.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime
looks: NCT eyes. soulless, it's like a literal NPC from a video game is looking at you
job: retail/fast food business. most boring and skill less jobs there is
personality: INTJ. most NPC and incel personality
hobby: cooking. most bland hobby on the planet.
interests: video games. do i even need to explain
Nigga wat intj is one of the most rare it's the prototypical incel aspie personality.

Npc is esfj or esfp. Basically being irrational (feeling rather than thinking), having no internal monologue or imagination or critical thinking (sensing rather than intuitive) and not being able to be by yourself
 
Well said. Anything else?

Job: graduates and works in an office
Looks: mtn and MTB
Why is intj npc, shouldn't it be istj?
Npcs are feeling not thinking. And extrovert not introvert.
 
looks: NCT eyes. soulless, it's like a literal NPC from a video game is looking at you
job: retail/fast food business. most boring and skill less jobs there is
personality: INTJ. most NPC and incel personality
hobby: cooking. most bland hobby on the planet.
interests: video games. do i even need to explain
the mbti community is pure cringe anyway man they take that shit too serious. and i definitely agree INXJ one of the cringiest personality type one can have especially if you consider how they think being an INXJ makes them intelligent or superior
 
  • +1
Reactions: Xangsane
Nigga wat intj is one of the most rare it's the prototypical incel aspie personality.
That would be INTP





Though it does come a close second...



 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: LampPostPrime
the mbti community is pure cringe anyway man they take that shit too serious. and i definitely agree INXJ one of the cringiest personality type one can have especially if you consider how they think being an INXJ makes them intelligent or superior
That would be INTP





Though it does come a close second...




is my personality NPC?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: chaddyboi66
 
That would be INTP





Though it does come a close second...




intj is are virgins ngl
 
What made you think you are a NPC?
 
yeah also true btw do you take the mbti shit serious?
Somewhat.

The way it's presented to and by most normies is a really watered down version of something more legit; that being Jung's cog-functions.

Even with that said, most normie tier tests like the one you'll find on "16 personalities" will provide some insight, but only because they build off of something more in depth.

So it's pretty legit but only if you look into actual cog-functions to type someone, and although other tests like "the big 5" are considered the most popular mbti can also be quite insightful into deeper aspects of a person's character.
 
Somewhat.

The way it's presented to and by most normies is a really watered down version of something more legit; that being Jung's cog-functions.

Even with that said, most normie tier tests like the one you'll find on "16 personalities" will provide some insight, but only because they build off of something more in depth.

So it's pretty legit but only if you look into actual cog-functions to type someone, and although other tests like "the big 5" are considered the most popular mbti can also be quite insightful into deeper aspects of a person's character.
agree on most of your points
but the online test like 16 personalities is completely bullshit tbh gives a wrong perspective
 
agree on most of your points
but the online test like 16 personalities is completely bullshit tbh gives a wrong perspective

Then try this instead
 
Automatically assuming you aren't one yourself
 
They go to the gym January first and quit after the first week. :rage:
 

Similar threads

valentine
Replies
33
Views
231
valentine
valentine
H
Replies
1
Views
23
autistic_tendencies
autistic_tendencies
Jason Voorhees
Replies
29
Views
401
Jason Voorhees
Jason Voorhees
L
Replies
24
Views
188
persuss
persuss
whiro
Replies
1
Views
25
whiro
whiro

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top