What are some signs of low intelligence?

[ascendingalways]

Racism is jewish satanic goyslop to divide the gentiles.

I’m a race realist who loves all races except most indians and Jews

 

[registerfasterusing]

Is iq cope?

Ive spoken to a few people who claim to be in the 130-150 range and something I notice about them is they tend to be very close minded and non-receptive. I think truly intelligent individuals are some of the most open minded and empathetic people, because they are able to critique themselves...

looksmax.org

 

[StalinCel]

I’m a race realist who loves all races except most indians and Jews

Christianity first. That's what jews hate. They're TALMUDIC SATANISTS.

 

[Sprinkles]

Title. In my opinion one of the most important signs of a low intelligence is narrow mindedness and unopenness to new perspectives

Being a .org user

 

[pluuto]

lack of curiosity

Racism the more you push to the humanism side the more retarded nazis and racists look just off of pure starvation of the cause

 

[saiya_online]

Like legitimately low iq ppl are obvious to spot. Bad impulse control maybe, bad memory, just more simple in how they think about problems, lack of academic prowess, maybe lack of active hobbies. Just behind basically.

Assuming you are a midwit they should come off as a little bit childlike. As you get older you can spot them easier cuz you've matured a little bit but they kinda haven't.

It's a bit interesting because childlike traits such as being care free, malleable (open to new ideas), and heightened memory are a lot of the virtued desired traits of intelligence. Like the difference between say for example the wise blue curious children from Akira versus a loud retard who asks constant questions because of constant confusion.

 

[ascendingalways]

Racism the more you push to the humanism side the more retarded nazis and racists look just off of pure starvation of the cause

Im high as fuck so forgive me if I don’t understand what you’re saying, but most racists don’t hate a certain race just for being. They tend to look at the negatives coming from each community, and make a generalization about a whole race because of the way the majority acts. It’s true that if nazi party won, the world would be a much much better and safer place everywhere. This doesn’t mean I agree with nazism. It’s also true that black people have a significantly lower iq, and cause the most crime. Most racism is from pattern recognition, which is a sign of high IQ.

 

[CorinthianLOX]

I’m a race realist who loves all races except most indians and Jews

Same

 

[CorinthianLOX]

Being a .org user

water tbh

 

[pluuto]

Christianity first. That's what jews hate. They're TALMUDIC SATANISTS.

Im high as fuck so forgive me if I don’t understand what you’re saying, but most racists don’t hate a certain race just for being. They tend to look at the negatives coming from each community, and make a generalization about a whole race because of the way the majority acts. It’s true that if nazi party won, the world would be a much much better and safer place everywhere. This doesn’t mean I agree with nazism. It’s also true that black people have a significantly lower iq, and cause the most crime. Most racism is from pattern recognition, which is a sign of high IQ.

Im high as fuck so forgive me if I don’t understand what you’re saying, but most racists don’t hate a certain race just for being. They tend to look at the negatives coming from each community, and make a generalization about a whole race because of the way the majority acts. It’s true that if nazi party won, the world would be a much much better and safer place everywhere. This doesn’t mean I agree with nazism. It’s also true that black people have a significantly lower iq, and cause the most crime. Most racism is from pattern recognition, which is a sign of high IQ.

Read it or not this still needs to be said, see you could say dnr but my point still stands

Honestly man I do want to have this conversation with you because I would say this response here proves my point if the only way you can justify racism is by cherry picking data saying “I don’t agree with Nazis but they’d make the world better” already loses the moral battle and to add upon that the pattern recognition I know this argument but I’ll explain how it falls apart pattern recognition ≠ truth you can throw this pattern recognition argument around but the pattern you’re describing is selecting only negative data from a group ignoring context or structural conditions and generalizing the worst behavior to the whole race what SHOULD you call that? To be precise you should call it lazy confirmation bias it’s the same “pattern recognition” that was used to justify witch hunts , segregation, and harming suspicious women in the 1600s to see one data marker and generalize a whole race isn’t high iq it’s honestly a hungry ego
Holstered with data a chimp could understand

Look bro I wish I could make a different post for this but this is the real question Let’s says the Nazis won who would the world be better for? A safer and better world under the Nazis? Not at all for the Slavs not at all for the Jews never for the disabled not even you would enjoy a world like that imagine a world where you have to be afraid of how you breathe a world where free thought dies and one “ideal race” rules by violence and suppression along with that ideal race being apart of the human race that we all share the same Jews and Slavs he would target that’s not a better world that’s a world ruled by fake stories and rhetorics any philosopher or high iq man would look at that as absolute hell . I just want you to think about it man it’s not logically correct to even say it would be better and it would be even worse if you aren’t in line with that “ideal race”

 

[CorinthianLOX]

Read it or not this still needs to be said, see you could say dnr but my point still stands

Honestly man I do want to have this conversation with you because I would say this response here proves my point if the only way you can justify racism is by cherry picking data saying “I don’t agree with Nazis but they’d make the world better” already loses the moral battle and to add upon that the pattern recognition I know this argument but I’ll explain how it falls apart pattern recognition ≠ truth you can throw this pattern recognition argument around but the pattern you’re describing is selecting only negative data from a group ignoring context or structural conditions and generalizing the worst behavior to the whole race what SHOULD you call that? To be precise you should call it lazy confirmation bias it’s the same “pattern recognition” that was used to justify witch hunts , segregation, and harming suspicious women in the 1600s to see one data marker and generalize a whole race isn’t high iq it’s honestly a hungry ego
Holstered with data a chimp could understand

Look bro I wish I could make a different post for this but this is the real question Let’s says the Nazis won who would the world be better for? A safer and better world under the Nazis? Not at all for the Slavs not at all for the Jews never for the disabled not even you would enjoy a world like that imagine a world where you have to be afraid of how you breathe a world where free thought dies and one “ideal race” rules by violence and suppression along with that ideal race being apart of the human race that we all share the same Jews and Slavs he would target that’s not a better world that’s a world ruled by fake stories and rhetorics any philosopher or high iq man would look at that as absolute hell . I just want you to think about it man it’s not logically correct to even say it would be better and it would be even worse if you aren’t in line with that “ideal race”

It would be for my nation

 

[pluuto]

It would be for my nation

Sorry for late reply. I’m curious
when you say “its for your nation” what do you mean by that based on context
I might assume Germany and we can talk about that but right now what I’m putting down is nazism and racism that logically and morally make no sense and ask you I may have a different view on what you mean by for your nation so I would like to know what that means but just so you know even if the Nazis won the war it would completely destroy creativity would completely destroy freedom these ideologies absolutely destroyed a nation from the inside just for cutting anyone who didn’t fit this idea out of it

 

[CorinthianLOX]

Sorry for late reply. I’m curious
when you say “its for your nation” what do you mean by that based on context
I might assume Germany and we can talk about that but right now what I’m putting down is nazism and racism that logically and morally make no sense and ask you I may have a different view on what you mean by for your nation so I would like to know what that means but just so you know even if the Nazis won the war it would completely destroy creativity would completely destroy freedom these ideologies absolutely destroyed a nation from the inside just for cutting anyone who didn’t fit this idea out of it

I’m not from germany but my country and nation would be in a better place now if the axis won ww2

 

[True truecel]

Believing in any Just be _____ or Big ____ cock theories

BBC pill believers and JBW believers are two sides of the same coin, both equally retarded and faggoty

 

[lowltn222]

Title. In my opinion one of the most important signs of a low intelligence is narrow mindedness and unopenness to new perspectives

Deliberate ignorance/ disingenuousness in order to win an argument

 

[lblamegenetics]

U can just sense it lmfao

 

[ascendingalways]

Read it or not this still needs to be said, see you could say dnr but my point still stands

Honestly man I do want to have this conversation with you because I would say this response here proves my point if the only way you can justify racism is by cherry picking data saying “I don’t agree with Nazis but they’d make the world better” already loses the moral battle and to add upon that the pattern recognition I know this argument but I’ll explain how it falls apart pattern recognition ≠ truth you can throw this pattern recognition argument around but the pattern you’re describing is selecting only negative data from a group ignoring context or structural conditions and generalizing the worst behavior to the whole race what SHOULD you call that? To be precise you should call it lazy confirmation bias it’s the same “pattern recognition” that was used to justify witch hunts , segregation, and harming suspicious women in the 1600s to see one data marker and generalize a whole race isn’t high iq it’s honestly a hungry ego
Holstered with data a chimp could understand

Look bro I wish I could make a different post for this but this is the real question Let’s says the Nazis won who would the world be better for? A safer and better world under the Nazis? Not at all for the Slavs not at all for the Jews never for the disabled not even you would enjoy a world like that imagine a world where you have to be afraid of how you breathe a world where free thought dies and one “ideal race” rules by violence and suppression along with that ideal race being apart of the human race that we all share the same Jews and Slavs he would target that’s not a better world that’s a world ruled by fake stories and rhetorics any philosopher or high iq man would look at that as absolute hell . I just want you to think about it man it’s not logically correct to even say it would be better and it would be even worse if you aren’t in line with that “ideal race”

No

Read it or not this still needs to be said, see you could say dnr but my point still stands

Honestly man I do want to have this conversation with you because I would say this response here proves my point if the only way you can justify racism is by cherry picking data saying “I don’t agree with Nazis but they’d make the world better” already loses the moral battle and to add upon that the pattern recognition I know this argument but I’ll explain how it falls apart pattern recognition ≠ truth you can throw this pattern recognition argument around but the pattern you’re describing is selecting only negative data from a group ignoring context or structural conditions and generalizing the worst behavior to the whole race what SHOULD you call that? To be precise you should call it lazy confirmation bias it’s the same “pattern recognition” that was used to justify witch hunts , segregation, and harming suspicious women in the 1600s to see one data marker and generalize a whole race isn’t high iq it’s honestly a hungry ego
Holstered with data a chimp could understand

Look bro I wish I could make a different post for this but this is the real question Let’s says the Nazis won who would the world be better for? A safer and better world under the Nazis? Not at all for the Slavs not at all for the Jews never for the disabled not even you would enjoy a world like that imagine a world where you have to be afraid of how you breathe a world where free thought dies and one “ideal race” rules by violence and suppression along with that ideal race being apart of the human race that we all share the same Jews and Slavs he would target that’s not a better world that’s a world ruled by fake stories and rhetorics any philosopher or high iq man would look at that as absolute hell . I just want you to think about it man it’s not logically correct to even say it would be better and it would be even worse if you aren’t in line with that “ideal race”

No one’s looking for an ideal race. They’re looking at things coming out of each community and race and criticizing it. It’s not white people making Chicago, New York, or LA unsafe. It’s not Christian’s whose religion says the age of consent is 3 and that they’re gods chosen people. If you educate yourself a bit more on what the Jewish religion stood for, and you took a look at the things Israel (the manifestation of that religion) is doing, we would be better off in a National Socialist country.

 

[CorinthianLOX]

No

No one’s looking for an ideal race. They’re looking at things coming out of each community and race and criticizing it. It’s not white people making Chicago, New York, or LA unsafe. It’s not Christian’s whose religion says the age of consent is 3 and that they’re gods chosen people. If you educate yourself a bit more on what the Jewish religion stood for, and you took a look at the things Israel (the manifestation of that religion) is doing, we would be better off in a National Socialist country.

True