
bogdanparowsak
Iron
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2024
- Posts
- 40
- Reputation
- 16
notural or not natural
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
what bout peptides and shit like thathgh and AI
HGH + aromasinnotural or not natural
it results in 5-6 inch more than predicted adult height, stop the cope.what bout peptides and shit like thathgh trials are conducted on people that are just starting puberty (they're around 9-10 years old), and the increase in height is still extremely modest, they still end up as short adults, most of the people contemplating it here are nearing the end of puberty and likely will not see any positive results at all.
arent those trails always with people with hgh deficiency?it results in 5-6 inch more than predicted adult height, stop the cope.
you're trying to discourage newgens from blasting because org memebers are evil and are killing the competition
i heard that mk does nothingAromasin + MK677 is a good stack
Its definitely cheaper than hgh and I heard that it is even better for heightmax combined with aromasin, but i can’t confirm that. Still the most important thing for heightmax would be blocking estrogen before your growth plates close.i heard that mk does nothing
cope677MK677
what about for bone width and muscle growth? im on 10 ui a day rn.hgh trials are conducted on people that are just starting puberty (they're around 9-10 years old), and the increase in height is still extremely modest, they still end up as short adults, most of the people contemplating it here are nearing the end of puberty and likely will not see any positive results at all.
It seems that Injecting human growth hormone after the age of 16 is a waste of resources, health, and time.high trials are conducted on people who are just starting puberty (they're around 9-10 years old), and the increase in height is still extremely modest, they still end up as short adults, and most of the people contemplating it here are nearing the end of puberty and likely will not see any positive results at all.
they're never that good of an idea.It seems that Injecting human growth hormone after the age of 16 is a waste of resources, health, and time.
Could the continuous usage of aromatase inhibitors be the best choice after puberty?
What is your stance on aromatase inhibitors?they're never that good of an idea.
No point arguing with retard teenagers.hgh trials are conducted on people that are just starting puberty (they're around 9-10 years old), and the increase in height is still extremely modest, they still end up as short adults, most of the people contemplating it here are nearing the end of puberty and likely will not see any positive results at all.