What are the ideal male cheekbones?

[pizza]

wrong, not a single model has "wide" cheekbones. None of the have any significant lateral protrusion.
View attachment 1139208
If you take a pic thats not distorted, even kortajarena has almost 0 lateral protrusion. Every model has a perfectly rectangular face shape and thats A LAW its not negotiable. Not a single male model without it. Only drago has a little bit of a diamond face shape, but he can get away with it.


No, you must achieve rectangular face shape, its essential to be GL as a man. If you get a wider jaw, it will be out of proportion to your eyes, eyebrows, browridge, and temple

you must get rid of this somehow

View attachment 1139214

toughts or advices?

 

[Mongrelcel]

toughts or advices?

what?

 

[pizza]

what?

how can i improve more my hollow cheeks?what you think bimax+genio should be for that?

 

[AutisticBeaner]

O'pry is a copy and paste of greek beauty standards, high cheekbones low mass are ideal.

no? the higher the better and the more massive the better

 

[volcelfatcel]

no? the higher the better and the more massive the better

Women have higher bone mass in cheekbones, men should have less and be higher. Angular high set low mass like o'Pry are ideal, they are very masculine, high class and aesthetic.

 

[AutisticBeaner]

Women have higher bone mass in cheekbones, men should have less and be higher. Angular high set low mass like o'Pry are ideal, they are very masculine, high class and aesthetic.

his cheekbones are very masculine and aesthetic but they could be more masculine and more aesthetic if they very bigger

 

[Mongrelcel]

Whenever I look at Hernan Drago, I always think that something's off in his face, but can't decide what is off?, What do you think?

I dont think there is anything off, he is one of the best looking men ever after all.

But he does have a few failos - his eyes are too narrow for his face OR his face is too wide for his eyes (more likely)
- his cheekbones have more lateral protrusion than they should
- his zygo width is too wide, and his jaw is just as wide, making it a bit too wide for his temples
-his cheekbones are too big, bloated and low positioned (cheekbones that are too wide are almost always lowset and bloated)
(these flaws make his face shape a bit more oval than it should be ideally)

On way to easily spot such cheekbones is to look at a selfie taken from up close - so that there is heavy distortion. Due to the way focal length distors, if the cheekbones are even a little bit too wide, it will blow them up

heres a pic taken with a lens thats longer than 70 mm (or simply taken from far away, its the same thing)

heres a selfie

Do you see how much more oval his face shape is in the second?

Now lets look at eriksen, who has a very rectangular face shape with little lateral protrusion

Non disorted

Selfie

There is a difference, but not as large as dragos. Of course, I cannot guarantee that all selfies were taken with the same distortion, but they both look to be taken at arms length.

Also, his medial canthus (dragos) is not exceptional. Its round. Round medial canthus will contribute to the entire eye looking more rounded - ofc drago has enough exceptional traits in his eye area to make them amazing, but neverthless. Im just nitpicking.

Lets look at dellisola, who doesent have a downturned medial canthus at all, and yet it looks very good

It almost looks underdeveloped and asian, but because its so pointy, it contributes to his eye area so well. Its anything but rounded.

I have invented a ratio - the face width (but not bizygo) divided by pfl.

This ratio is EXTREMLY sensitive to focal lenghs and distortion. So if you want to mesaure and compare, you need pics taken at the exact same focal length.
But no matter how you look at it, dragos is not good.
It when I mesaured, it came out as 4.8
For example, eriksen is 4.4 / chico is 4.57 (ratios were mesaured at pics taken with long lens)
You can see how much larger in PFL eriksens eyes appear.
Lower is better of course.
The highest ratio I could find on a chad, was hemsworth, at whopping 4.95 - thats at the very edge, if it was any worse, it would be a massive failo.

Lets lool at this absolute PSL 7.5 gigachad

It comes out as insane 4. Now this is a drawing, but you can see just how much more sex appeal people with a lower ratio have right? I dare you, test this at any chad, and the one with a lower ratio will simply look more "sexy". Eriksen comes to mind instantly.

 

[volcelfatcel]

I dont think there is anything off, he is one of the best looking men ever after all.

But he does have a few failos - his eyes are too narrow for his face OR his face is too wide for his eyes (more likely)
- his cheekbones have more lateral protrusion than they should
- his zygo width is too wide, and his jaw is just as wide, making it a bit too wide for his temples
-his cheekbones are too big, bloated and low positioned (cheekbones that are too wide are almost always lowset and bloated)
(these flaws make his face shape a bit more oval than it should be ideally)

On way to easily spot such cheekbones is to look at a selfie taken from up close - so that there is heavy distortion. Due to the way focal length distors, if the cheekbones are even a little bit too wide, it will blow them up

heres a pic taken with a lens thats longer than 70 mm (or simply taken from far away, its the same thing)
View attachment 1139395View attachment 1139397

heres a selfie
View attachment 1139400View attachment 1139398

Do you see how much more oval his face shape is in the second?

Now lets look at eriksen, who has a very rectangular face shape with little lateral protrusion

Non disorted
View attachment 1139401

Selfie

View attachment 1139405View attachment 1139407

There is a difference, but not as large as dragos. Of course, I cannot guarantee that all selfies were taken with the same distortion, but they both look to be taken at arms length.

Also, his medial canthus (dragos) is not exceptional. Its round. Round medial canthus will contribute to the entire eye looking more rounded - ofc drago has enough exceptional traits in his eye area to make them amazing, but neverthless. Im just nitpicking.
View attachment 1139413

Lets look at dellisola, who doesent have a downturned medial canthus at all, and yet it looks very good
View attachment 1139418View attachment 1139419
It almost looks underdeveloped and asian, but because its so pointy, it contributes to his eye area so well. Its anything but rounded.

I agree with ur rectangle face being ideal, I think some aspects of square are good as well. Rectangle>square >> everything in existence.

 

[Mongrelcel]

I agree with ur rectangle face being ideal, I think some aspects of square are good as well. Rectangle>square >> everything in existence.

Some super masc chads with insane FWRH can appear as square, but I would still classify that as a rectangle

Cavill would be like a prime example of a square, but I would still say its rectangular.

IMO, a face should be classified as "square" when its square to the point of it being a failo

For example someone with short face syndrome.

 

[volcelfatcel]

Some super masc chads with insane FWRH can appear as square, but I would still classify that as a rectangle

View attachment 1139439

Cavill would be like a prime example of a square, but I would still say its rectangular.

IMO, a face should be classified as "square" when its square to the point of it being a failo

View attachment 1139446
For example someone with short face syndrome.

Oh so when you say square it's short face like OVERLY square. 90 degree angles and shit.

 

[Mongrelcel]

Oh so when you say square it's short face like OVERLY square. 90 degree angles and shit.

Yeah, imo there is no reason to classify a rectangular face with silghtly higher FWHR to a whole new category.
But if its too high, id call that a square face (or oval if bald with no jaw)

 

[Beanermaxxer]

 

[Deleted member 13928]

Women have higher bone mass in cheekbones, men should have less and be higher. Angular high set low mass like o'Pry are ideal, they are very masculine, high class and aesthetic.

Legit dude

 

[volcelfatcel]

View attachment 1139452View attachment 1139453

ramirez' or o'prys, Ramirez has the IDEAL lower set cheekbones with insane forward projection.

 

[Deleted member 13928]

I dont think there is anything off, he is one of the best looking men ever after all.

But he does have a few failos - his eyes are too narrow for his face OR his face is too wide for his eyes (more likely)
- his cheekbones have more lateral protrusion than they should
- his zygo width is too wide, and his jaw is just as wide, making it a bit too wide for his temples
-his cheekbones are too big, bloated and low positioned (cheekbones that are too wide are almost always lowset and bloated)
(these flaws make his face shape a bit more oval than it should be ideally)

On way to easily spot such cheekbones is to look at a selfie taken from up close - so that there is heavy distortion. Due to the way focal length distors, if the cheekbones are even a little bit too wide, it will blow them up

heres a pic taken with a lens thats longer than 70 mm (or simply taken from far away, its the same thing)
View attachment 1139395View attachment 1139397

heres a selfie
View attachment 1139400View attachment 1139398

Do you see how much more oval his face shape is in the second?

Now lets look at eriksen, who has a very rectangular face shape with little lateral protrusion

Non disorted
View attachment 1139401

Selfie

View attachment 1139405View attachment 1139407

There is a difference, but not as large as dragos. Of course, I cannot guarantee that all selfies were taken with the same distortion, but they both look to be taken at arms length.

Also, his medial canthus (dragos) is not exceptional. Its round. Round medial canthus will contribute to the entire eye looking more rounded - ofc drago has enough exceptional traits in his eye area to make them amazing, but neverthless. Im just nitpicking.
View attachment 1139413

Lets look at dellisola, who doesent have a downturned medial canthus at all, and yet it looks very good
View attachment 1139418View attachment 1139419
It almost looks underdeveloped and asian, but because its so pointy, it contributes to his eye area so well. Its anything but rounded.

I have invented a ratio - the face width (but not bizygo) divided by pfl.
View attachment 1139422
This ratio is EXTREMLY sensitive to focal lenghs and distortion. So if you want to mesaure and compare, you need pics taken at the exact same focal length.
But no matter how you look at it, dragos is not good.
It when I mesaured, it came out as 4.8
For example, eriksen is 4.4 / chico is 4.57 (ratios were mesaured at pics taken with long lens)
You can see how much larger in PFL eriksens eyes appear.
Lower is better of course.
The highest ratio I could find on a chad, was hemsworth, at whopping 4.95 - thats at the very edge, if it was any worse, it would be a massive failo.

Lets lool at this absolute PSL 7.5 gigachad
View attachment 1139430

It comes out as insane 4. Now this is a drawing, but you can see just how much more sex appeal people with a lower ratio have right? I dare you, test this at any chad, and the one with a lower ratio will simply look more "sexy". Eriksen comes to mind instantly.

Legit dude!!, You literally theorised the whole thing for me, thanks so much!!

 

[Deleted member 13928]

Some super masc chads with insane FWRH can appear as square, but I would still classify that as a rectangle

View attachment 1139439

Cavill would be like a prime example of a square, but I would still say its rectangular.

IMO, a face should be classified as "square" when its square to the point of it being a failo

View attachment 1139446
For example someone with short face syndrome.

Do you think Brad Pitt has a square face? And what about Depp?

 

[Mongrelcel]

Do you think Brad Pitt has a square face? And what about Depp?

Depp is one of the people that made me realize that rectangular face shape is everything. You'd think, depp - massive cheekbones - classic diamond shape (used as example in many yt videos) - must be diamond right?
No. Hes a rectangle. Albeit a bit less than some, its still in the realms of a rectangle.

Also, he would look better if he was more rectangular. Morph it, see for yourself.

Pitt is classic rectangle, nothing to discuss there. His zygo is smaller than his bigonial

 

[Deleted member 13928]

Depp is one of the people that made me realize that rectangular face shape is everything. You'd think, depp - massive cheekbones - classic diamond shape (used as example in many yt videos) - must be diamond right?
No. Hes a rectangle. Albeit a bit less than some, its still in the realms of a rectangle.
View attachment 1139494View attachment 1139495View attachment 1139498
Also, he would look better if he was more rectangular. Morph it, see for yourself.

Pitt is classic rectangle, nothing to discuss there. His zygo is smaller than his bigonial

Legit dude. Depp was always classically handsome man, very righteously my man crush too!!

 

[Deleted member 13928]

Depp is one of the people that made me realize that rectangular face shape is everything. You'd think, depp - massive cheekbones - classic diamond shape (used as example in many yt videos) - must be diamond right?
No. Hes a rectangle. Albeit a bit less than some, its still in the realms of a rectangle.
View attachment 1139494View attachment 1139495View attachment 1139498
Also, he would look better if he was more rectangular. Morph it, see for yourself.

Pitt is classic rectangle, nothing to discuss there. His zygo is smaller than his bigonial

Legit dude. Depp was always classically handsome man, very righteously my man crush too!!

Was my comment laughable?

 

[Mongrelcel]

Was my comment laughable?

dw, everyone here has a male model that they obsess over

curiously, almost always people pick the one that resembles them the most. Now I wonder if you share some traits with depp?

 

[Beanermaxxer]

ramirez' or o'prys, Ramirez has the IDEAL lower set cheekbones with insane forward projection.

With perfect lighting gigafrauding i can make mine look similar to Ramirez’ i think

 

[volcelfatcel]

With perfect lighting gigafrauding i can make mine look similar to Ramirez’ i think
View attachment 1139560

keyword frauding, ramirez had insane forward growth regardless of lighting and in candids his cheekbones were always always highlighted. they were like a perfect square shape hard to describe it

 

[Deleted member 13928]

keyword frauding, ramirez had insane forward growth regardless of lighting and in candids his cheekbones were always always highlighted. they were like a perfect square shape hard to describe it

If only he wasn't a retardcel and didn't commit to such heinous crimes, he could've been Jeremy Meeks of the '80s

 

[Deleted member 13928]

With perfect lighting gigafrauding i can make mine look similar to Ramirez’ i think
View attachment 1139560

Are you sucking your cheeks in?, Because your cheekbones really look great, in my opinion?

 

[Beanermaxxer]

Are you sucking your cheeks in?, Because your cheekbones really look great, in my opinion?

No, i’m clenching my jaw really hard

 

[AsGoodAsItGets]

keyword frauding, ramirez had insane forward growth regardless of lighting and in candids his cheekbones were always always highlighted. they were like a perfect square shape hard to describe it

just be incarcerated for perfect courtroom lighting theory