What are top 3 physical traits guys have besides good face to make girls wanna sleep with them?

islaymtbs

islaymtbs

lltn
Joined
Feb 11, 2026
Posts
5,536
Reputation
3,480
Title
 
  • +1
Reactions: LXR, Bestowed, iamnotaracist and 1 other person
Height, decently muscular build (like 300mg a week roids with average response type) and a physical fat stack of cash or a expensive car :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: slavvicularr, bddcoper, Mogmo and 1 other person
Ur an ugly coping retard shut up
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LegendaryKennen, nocajebudala, slavvicularr and 2 others
Height, frame, phenotype

I would put muscle but I think it could be outcompeted by frame and phenotype.
For phenotype though, that is highly environmentally dependent.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: slavvicularr, registerfasterusing and islaymtbs
Height, frame, phenotype

I would put muscle but I think it could be outcompeted by frame and phenotype.
For phenotype though, that is highly environmentally dependent.
What’s phenotype
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LegendaryKennen, iamnotaracist, enchanted_elixir and 1 other person
Height, frame, pheno

muscle doesn’t matter if your frame is shit
Both matter dumbass. And height is part of pheno
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: enchanted_elixir, islaymtbs and registerfasterusing
What’s phenotype
Wait What GIF
 
  • +1
Reactions: LegendaryKennen, slavvicularr and islaymtbs
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: slavvicularr and enchanted_elixir
And phenotype is not ‘environmentally dependent’
 
  • JFL
Reactions: enchanted_elixir
support trans rights in his bio
 
  • +1
Reactions: slavvicularr and islaymtbs
  • +1
Reactions: islaymtbs
Height, frame, pheno

muscle doesn’t matter if your frame is shit
Yeah but an actually shit frame is kinda rare, 85% of people have a normal ish frame or above
 
  • +1
Reactions: slavvicularr, enchanted_elixir, Mogmo and 1 other person
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: slavvicularr, islaymtbs and registerfasterusing
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: islaymtbs, Mogmo and registerfasterusing
I know and i don't care. Height is objective apart of pheno
View attachment 5483875
Google definition is talking abt phenotypes in biology u retard

for human phenotypes in anthropology height was something that mattered like 100 years ago but hardly as much now cuz of improved diets etc
 
  • WTF
Reactions: iamnotaracist
It has to be since folks have preferences and those preferences are not distributed equally in all locales.
retarded faggot spewing irrelevant bullshit u have no idea what ur even saying

it’s genetic u retard
 
  • JFL
Reactions: enchanted_elixir
Google definition is talking abt phenotypes in biology u retard

for human phenotypes in anthropology height was something that mattered like 100 years ago but hardly as much now cuz of improved diets etc
Wtf are you talking about. Importance or environmental effect of height doesn't change the fact it plays a role in your Phenotype.
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: islaymtbs and registerfasterusing
Wtf are you talking about. Importance or environmental effect of height doesn't change the fact it plays a role in your Phenotype.
nigga read what I just told u again and think about it for a second
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: iamnotaracist
retarded faggot spewing irrelevant bullshit u have no idea what ur even saying

it’s genetic u retard
Saar u say sar that a person with phenotype x has a universal slaying rate that stays constant across locales like Mumbai, Bangkok, Mombasa, Rio de Janeiro, Oslo, Malmo, Hamburg, New York City, Denver, San Francisco, Montgomery, Mexico, City, and Quito saar?

Thinking Thought GIF by Loryn Powell
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: islaymtbs and registerfasterusing
Saar u say sar that a person with phenotype x has a universal slaying rate in Mumbai, Bangkok, Mombasa, Rio de Janerio, Oslo, Malmo, New York City, Denver, San Francisco, Montgomery, Mexico, City, and Quito saar?

Thinking Thought GIF by Loryn Powell
this is a retarded argument
non caucasoid pheno = subhuman so it doesn’t matter

caucasoid pheno = Chad anywhere that caucasoids aren’t dominant
 
  • JFL
Reactions: enchanted_elixir
Saar u say sar that a person with phenotype x has a universal slaying rate that stays constant across locales like Mumbai, Bangkok, Mombasa, Rio de Janeiro, Oslo, Malmo, Hamburg, New York City, Denver, San Francisco, Montgomery, Mexico, City, and Quito saar?

Thinking Thought GIF by Loryn Powell
I thought u were saying phenotype is determined by environmental factors cuz of ur nigger tier word phrasing
 
  • JFL
Reactions: enchanted_elixir
nigga read what I just told u again and think about it for a second
"Google definition is talking about biology"
That doesn't seperate it with a fucking Phenotype.
Anthropologically height plays a role in pheno, and it is caused by biological so there's no fucking separation. You just pulled an ipsie dixit nigger
 
  • +1
Reactions: islaymtbs
"Google definition is talking about biology"
That doesn't seperate it with a fucking Phenotype.
Anthropologically height plays a role in pheno, and it is caused by biological so there's no fucking separation. You just pulled an ipsie dixit nigger
The definition of a phenotype in biology is different from that of its definition in anthropology
 
  • +1
Reactions: iamnotaracist
this is a retarded argument
non caucasoid pheno = subhuman so it doesn’t matter

caucasoid pheno = Chad anywhere that caucasoids aren’t dominant
This is the argument you seem to be parroting, that folks of a given phenotype x has a constant slay rate independent of locale.

Probably a misunderstanding of what I was trying to get at.

I wanted to say -> How your phenotype performs is environmentally dependent (folks of a given locale have different phenotype preference distributions)

You say it's not environmentally dependent, then go on to insult me saying I am saying irrelevant retarded bullshit, then I used sarcasm to point out how I am interpreting what you're saying.

Then you said this, which is mostly substantiated but can not be made absolute since it is not true in all cases. You are likely not going to be Chad as an ethnic Somali, Dravidian or Amhara in Nigeria despite being Caucasoid.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: islaymtbs and registerfasterusing
The definition of a phenotype in biology is different from that of its definition in anthropology
You folks are really making a scene of this.

You folks know what LOOKSMAXERS mean when we say phenotype (ethnic/cultural/coloring/morphology)

Saar biology said this
Saar anthropology said that

We looksmaxers crafted our own meaning of the term, which you folks have to have the awareness to understand and should know better since you folks have been here (as in the forum) for a while.
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: islaymtbs and registerfasterusing
This is the argument you seem to be parroting, that folks of a given phenotype x has a constant slay rate independent of locale.

Probably a misunderstanding of what I was trying to get at.

I wanted to say -> How your phenotype performs is environmentally dependent (folks of a given locale have different phenotype preference distributions)

You say it's not environmentally dependent, then go on to insult me saying I am saying irrelevant retarded bullshit, then I used sarcasm to point out how I am interpreting what you're saying.

Then you said this, which is mostly substantiated but can not be made absolute since it is not true in all cases. You are likely not going to be Chad as an ethnic Somali, Dravidian or Amhara in Nigeria despite being Caucasoid.
holy pretentious nigga

ethiopids arent caucasoid retarded nigger

caucasoid = nordid, med, cromagnid, alpinid, orientalid (mostly), and indid (mostly)
turanid is like half caucasoid

Ethiopids are mostly ANA and basal Eurasian so wouldn’t be correct to call them caucasoid
19th century anthropologists were retarded for the most part
 
I thought u were saying phenotype is determined by environmental factors cuz of ur nigger tier word phrasing
No no no, I was mocking your point in an Indian accent to add to the obscenity of what you were saying.
 
You folks are really making a scene of this.

You folks know what LOOKSMAXERS mean when we say phenotype (ethnic/cultural/coloring/morphology)

Saar biology said this
Saar anthropology said that

We looksmaxers crafted our own meaning of the term, which you folks have to have the awareness to understand and should know better since you folks have been here (as in the forum) for a while.
why are u talking like Joe Biden nigger

he was referring to the definition in biology so yeah obviously we have to distinguish between that and the anthropological one
 
Height, shoulder to waist ratio and hair
 
  • +1
Reactions: islaymtbs
No no no, I was mocking your point in an Indian accent to add to the obscenity of what you were saying.
just admit ur retarded nigger
idk wtf ur referring to you’ve been spewing bs this whole time
 
No no no, I was mocking your point in an Indian accent to add to the obscenity of what you were saying.
This what I was talking abt
“For phenotype though, that is highly environmentally dependent.”
 
  • +1
Reactions: enchanted_elixir
holy pretentious nigga

ethiopids arent caucasoid retarded nigger

caucasoid = nordid, med, cromagnid, alpinid, orientalid (mostly), and indid (mostly)
turanid is like half caucasoid

Ethiopids are mostly ANA and basal Eurasian so wouldn’t be correct to call them caucasoid
19th century anthropologists were retarded for the most part
I said Amhara, not Ethiopid.

Stop with the insults if you can not read what I said, then presume I said something stupid, and go on to discombobulate your own brain's work of fiction thinking you verbally destroyed me -- just for me to correct you on what I actually said, you look extremely silly and stupid.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: islaymtbs and registerfasterusing
I said Amhara, not Ethiopid.

Stop with the insults if you can not read what I said, then presume I said something stupid, and go on to discombobulate your own brain's work of fiction thinking you verbally destroyed me -- just for me to correct you on what I actually said, you look extremely silly and stupid.
“You are likely not going to be Chad as an ethnic Somali, Dravidian or Amhara in Nigeria despite being Caucasoid.”

Nigger do u realize Amhara = Ethiopian and the predominant PHENOTYPE in WTHIOPIA is ETHIOPID
 
This what I was talking abt
“For phenotype though, that is highly environmentally dependent.”
When I said that, I meant performance. I thought i could just leave that out to be implied, because the OP was talking about physical traits that help with mating performance (read the title), so I presumed I could just talk about these things without having to explicitly mention them but you misunderstood what I was saying.
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: islaymtbs and registerfasterusing
When I said that, I meant performance. I thought i could just leave that out to be implied, because the OP was talking about physical traits that help with mating performance (read the title), so I presumed I could just talk about these things without having to explicitly mention them but you misunderstood what I was saying.
When I said that, I meant performance. I thought i could just leave that out to be implied, because the OP was talking about physical traits that help with mating performance (read the title), so I presumed I could just talk about these things without having to explicitly mention them but you misunderstood what I was saying.
 
assuming good face = low bodyfat % by default;

height
frame/physique
hair
Every hairmaxxer knows how much hair matters, since few do this though they never get to this point of realization.
 
  • +1
Reactions: islaymtbs
Height, shoulder to waist ratio and hair

Shoulder to face width ratio = 4.0 is generally more accurate for those who are considered to have good frames.
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: LXR and islaymtbs
Shoulder to face width ratio = 4.0 is generally more accurate for those who are considered to have good frames.
Yes but most models who are hyped up in this space have average shoulders for their height but insanely huge skulls. This makes them look like adolescents in real life. I think skull height is more important than width. Francisco Lachowski has a taller skull but not so wide, yet his frame looks childish despite being average for his height.
 
  • +1
Reactions: islaymtbs
Yes but most models who are hyped up in this space have average shoulders for their height but insanely huge skulls. This makes them look like adolescents in real life. I think skull height is more important than width. Francisco Lachowski has a taller skull but not so wide, yet his frame looks childish despite being average for his height.

Well they’re hyped for their skulls, not their bodies. They would be better with the 4:1 ratio but it would require an inhuman bideltoid width well over 60 cm in their cases.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LXR

Similar threads

hitmancrewzz
Replies
3
Views
40
GonorrhoeaGobbler
GonorrhoeaGobbler
islaymtbs
Replies
2
Views
13
arx
arx
iblamechico
Replies
29
Views
195
Vannx
Vannx

Users who are viewing this thread

  • zanenevalackbanks
  • leon09
Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →