What are your arguments against pacifier fetish?

Kill yourself worthless pedo.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
"objects associated with children being sexualized increases the chance of child abuse"
Objects associated with people being harmed (guns in video games) being normalized increases the chances of school shooters
 
Objects associated with people being harmed (guns in video games) being normalized increases the chances of school shooters
I don't see how this is a reductio. Even if it was, the difference is in the direct fetishization v. playing a game that happens to have using guns as one of its features.

The reason I say it isn't a reductio is because there is actual empirical work to suggest that exposure to violence, even simulated, likely does increase antisocial behavior

Edit: also people in TCC and other anti social coms do make and play school shooting games in roblox, and presumably you'd agree that you wouldn't want someone like that in your school
 
v. playing a game that happens to have using guns as one of its features.
A game that’s entirely centered around shooting* hell, violent crime in general grand theft auto.
The reason I say it isn't a reductio is because there is actual empirical work to suggest that exposure to violence, even simulated, likely does increase antisocial behavior
bro I’ve been saying you to provide the evidence that a paraphilia leads to pedophilia all day:feelscry:
 
A game that’s entirely centered around shooting* hell, violent crime in general grand theft auto.

bro I’ve been saying you to provide the evidence that a paraphilia leads to pedophilia all day:feelscry:
Alright yeah let's just end it here. Good job for the most part.
 
Where the evidence
The argument constitutes evidence as a valid argument that has remained uncontested and has responded to every challenge having P, where p is any proposition, as it's conclusion is probability-raising of its truth
 
The argument constitutes evidence as a valid argument that has remained uncontested and has responded to every challenge having P, where p is any proposition, as it's conclusion is probability-raising of its truth
No. I’ve provided evidence u haven’t.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Tenres
Bruv left cuz I schooled him yea?
Reading material 👇
Original 11500118 1
 
Genuinely? It doesn’t harm anyone. It doesn’t depict real life children or even animated ones like lolicon, it’s just an object.

I will listen to your arguments,

Inb4 “muh it’s weird bro!1!1”
@alurmo @ClackChoopedAsFk @gconqestor @yushmaxx @GG's
Creepy
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
I was joking there.

But i don’t see how I lost, you ended the debate when asked to provide evidence, and I provided both evidence and logical reasoning as to why this paraphilia is harmless and isn’t pedophilia or leads to children being abused.
 
I was joking there.

But i don’t see how I lost, you ended the debate when asked to provide evidence, and I provided both evidence and logical reasoning as to why this paraphilia is harmless and isn’t pedophilia or leads to children being abused.
I was joking too buddy.

You did lose simply because everything you put into question was responded to as well as the open point about allowing pedophiles to subvert and exploit your community going unaddressed. And outside of the debate, I do think that's an actual concern. The community (looksmax.org) is full of actual pedophiles.

Edit: it was smart to push for empirical evidence as it turns out there are studies that show paraphilic infantilism simply isn't associated with pedophilia or CSA. Instead of pressing me (as I just asked for the argument as to why I would be obligated to do so, you didn't respond hence it not mattering dialectically), you should've just posted those and I would've looked horrible.

The reductio you tried to do was also good but I responded basically ideally. I was going to bite the bullet but people for some reason don't think playing games where you kill a bunch of people is antisocial, so for rhetoric I moved around the point.
 
Last edited:
Genuinely? It doesn’t harm anyone. It doesn’t depict real life children or even animated ones like lolicon, it’s just an object.

I will listen to your arguments,

Inb4 “muh it’s weird bro!1!1”
@alurmo @ClackChoopedAsFk @gconqestor @yushmaxx @GG's
Honestly yeah it's harmless, if your partner is fine w it then do whatever you want
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
Fetishizing objects associated with children. Very likely to attract people who are genuine predators.
genuine pedophiles would get castrated if they pollute my pacifier fetish
 
  • +1
Reactions: horseman., Tenres and ICXCLuvr
you should've just posted those and I would've looked horrible.
@horseman. earlier did I not just show two screenshots proving that paraphilic infantilism isn’t pedophilia? I literally tagged you in it so I know I’m not trippin
IMG 8061

but people for some reason don't think playing games where you kill a bunch of people is antisocial, so for rhetoric I moved around the point.
Because it isn’t. and again there are studies to prove this wrong.
 
  • +1
Reactions: horseman.
f
its associated with infants its pretty messed up to slap it on a whore
breast feedin is associated with infants does that men who like sucking tits are pedophiles?


from a legal standpoint we are doing nothing that harms children and pedophiles are born pedophiles and they need to be castrated
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
Uneducated pedo fascist does not mean racist
It’s still a harmful ideology

And “boy summer”
Is a term associated with racists, but whatever
 
bro pls change your signature
im tired of scrolling down damn near a whole screen jus to read the next comment :feelswhy::feelswhy:
Its light cardio fat fingers
 

Similar threads

ethnogitis
Replies
2
Views
14
ethnogitis
ethnogitis
pleasevanity
Replies
1
Views
32
pleasevanity
pleasevanity
sasha108
Discussion PACIFIER GTFIH
Replies
5
Views
22
sasha108
sasha108
Old Büll
Replies
14
Views
160
tomfromthesnow
tomfromthesnow
C
Replies
18
Views
114
pwoanfrdg
pwoanfrdg

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top