What chatgpt thinks about my account

FramePillGymMaxx

FramePillGymMaxx

Co-founder of GTC inv
Joined
Jun 7, 2025
Posts
8,063
Reputation
29,193
1000155214
1000155216

:p:p
@WhyNotMe?? @idk769876 @Jager @2vi @tunisianropemaxxer
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: .Cx, 2414763h, Zygotic and 18 others
I feel fucking famous
 
  • +1
Reactions: .Cx, 2414763h, Zygotic and 11 others
"TOP-TIER" ngas bow down to me
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: 2414763h, Zygotic, Finnishmogger and 10 others
Wowowowowowowowowow
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Zygotic, Finnishmogger, kiing_ronk and 7 others
Not sth to be Proud of
 
  • +1
Reactions: .Cx, Zygotic, tunisianropemaxxer and 3 others
Bump
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zygotic, tunisianropemaxxer, WhyNotMe?? and 2 others
Based on the above, Vermilioncore’s persona seems to combine elements of:

  • The enigmatic influencer — frequent visibility, many posts, but maintains some anonymity and mystique.
  • The rhetorician / performer — stylized writing, perhaps intentionally crafted posts to provoke, persuade, or entertain.
  • The introspective / conflicted voice — hints of self‑critique, emotional language, and tension between public persona and inner feelings.
  • The polarizing figure — draws both admiration and criticism; community debates over authenticity and motivations.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zygotic, tunisianropemaxxer, WhyNotMe?? and 2 others
Vermilioncore said:
Based on the above, Vermilioncore’s persona seems to combine elements of:

  • The enigmatic influencer — frequent visibility, many posts, but maintains some anonymity and mystique.
  • The rhetorician / performer — stylized writing, perhaps intentionally crafted posts to provoke, persuade, or entertain.
  • The introspective / conflicted voice — hints of self‑critique, emotional language, and tension between public persona and inner feelings.
  • The polarizing figure — draws both admiration and criticism; community debates over authenticity and motivations.
Click to expand...
Cold
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zygotic, tunisianropemaxxer, WhyNotMe?? and 2 others
Dead thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zygotic, tunisianropemaxxer, WhyNotMe?? and 1 other person
can u ask me, it doesn't work for me:feelscry:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zygotic, tunisianropemaxxer, WhyNotMe?? and 1 other person
Ask him about me, i cant send to him rn
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zygotic, kiing_ronk, tunisianropemaxxer and 3 others
Ask him abt @Master or @Gengar
 
  • +1
Reactions: Zygotic, kiing_ronk, tunisianropemaxxer and 2 others
why did you cut off at the but:think::unsure:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Zygotic, kiing_ronk, tunisianropemaxxer and 2 others
WhyNotMe?? said:
Ask him about me, i cant send to him rn
Click to expand...
1000155230
1000155228
1000155226

Me n twin so famous even gpt be glazin us

But ion like that it mentioned me multiple times like ur almost my shadow, not cool
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Zygotic, kiing_ronk, WhyNotMe?? and 3 others
Mine just insults me 😡
 
  • JFL
Reactions: kiing_ronk, Vazelrr, Justakid and 2 others

he wouldn't stop talking about my 'weaknesses' so I asked him to make a list didnt expect it to be 15 fucking reasons long​

​

⚠️ Full List of HTNgrevious’s Weaknesses​

1. Overreliance on Provocation​

  • Frequently uses insults or mockery (“retard,” “fuck the rest,” etc.) to assert dominance.
  • This creates a tough-guy persona but undermines credibility and emotional control.
  • Often dismisses opposing views instead of debating them — a sign of insecurity disguised as confidence.

2. Identity Overlap With Forum Culture​

  • Appears deeply tied to the Looksmax.org ecosystem.
  • Self-described focus: “I literally don’t think about anything but looksmaxxing and the gym.”
  • This level of identification suggests narrow psychological bandwidth — little variety in worldview, values, or personal fulfillment.

3. Lack of Emotional Regulation​

  • Responds aggressively to mild disagreement or naïve questions.
  • Uses ridicule to handle discomfort rather than analysis or humor.
  • Reflects reactivity, not authority — emotionally volatile people tend to lose influence long-term.

4. Performative Hyper-Masculinity​

  • Leans on exaggerated dominance, status flexing, and hostility to display strength.
  • The behavior is performative — strength displayed instead of embodied.
  • Ironically signals insecurity: confident people don’t need to constantly remind others they’re confident.

5. Tunnel Vision​

  • Nearly all posts orbit looks, body, or hierarchy.
  • Rarely demonstrates multi-domain thinking (career, relationships, mindset, creativity).
  • Suggests high specialization but low versatility — strong within one frame, weak outside it.

6. Inconsistent Standards​

  • Praises some users as “good base” then mocks others for similar traits — meaning judgment depends on status or personal bias.
  • May confuse aesthetic evaluation with social signaling.
  • Leads to a credibility gap — his “ratings” feel arbitrary rather than grounded.

7. Echo-Chamber Dependence​

  • Reinforces the same cultural script (HTN > CL > MTN hierarchies, “ascension,” etc.).
  • Rarely challenges the group’s ideology, suggesting he needs community validation.
  • Without dissent or new models, thought stagnates — intelligence becomes circular.

8. Hostile Communication Style​

  • Constant aggression alienates intelligent posters who value nuance.
  • Eventually limits his reach to only those who tolerate hostility.
  • Makes him appear more like an enforcer than a thinker.

9. Projection of Insecurity​

  • The constant policing of others’ “bases,” “ratios,” and “looksmax progress” hints at self-comparison.
  • Mocking others can be a defense mechanism against internal dissatisfaction.
  • Often, those obsessed with hierarchy are fighting to stay relevant within it.

10. Fragile Social Capital​

  • Reputation depends on maintaining the persona — not genuine respect.
  • If he stops posting or softens his tone, influence likely drops fast.
  • This is the mark of fragile authority — loud respect, quiet insecurity.

11. Low Constructive Output​

  • Rarely produces deep analytical or instructive posts (guides, breakdowns, frameworks).
  • Mostly reactive — comments on others rather than building original insight.
  • Strong reactors can dominate threads short-term but fade long-term without substance.

12. Zero-Sum Worldview​

  • Views status, looks, and validation as limited resources.
  • Operates under “if others rise, I fall.”
  • Prevents collaboration or meaningful social growth — locks him in endless competition.

13. Intellectual Narrowness​

  • Despite clear intelligence in aesthetics, his thinking style is more mechanical than abstract.
  • Focused on measurable ratios rather than conceptual understanding (e.g., self-image, perception, psychology).
  • This makes his advice rigid and unscalable beyond the forum environment.

14. Vulnerability to Burnout / Nihilism​

  • Forum veterans with his style often become jaded or nihilistic when the “HTN chase” plateaus.
  • Because identity is tied to progress and dominance, stagnation = identity crisis.
  • Many similar users end up withdrawing, becoming bitter, or leaving after losing motivation.

15. Lack of Long-Term Vision​

  • No visible strategy beyond looksmaxing and gym.
  • No philosophical or lifestyle integration — just repetition of one domain.
  • Limits personal evolution; success becomes cyclical rather than exponential.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: tunisianropemaxxer, Vazelrr and FramePillGymMaxx
HTNGrevious said:

he wouldn't stop talking about my 'weaknesses' so I asked him to make a list didnt expect it to be 15 fucking reasons long​

​

⚠️ Full List of HTNgrevious’s Weaknesses​

1. Overreliance on Provocation​

  • Frequently uses insults or mockery (“retard,” “fuck the rest,” etc.) to assert dominance.
  • This creates a tough-guy persona but undermines credibility and emotional control.
  • Often dismisses opposing views instead of debating them — a sign of insecurity disguised as confidence.

2. Identity Overlap With Forum Culture​

  • Appears deeply tied to the Looksmax.org ecosystem.
  • Self-described focus: “I literally don’t think about anything but looksmaxxing and the gym.”
  • This level of identification suggests narrow psychological bandwidth — little variety in worldview, values, or personal fulfillment.

3. Lack of Emotional Regulation​

  • Responds aggressively to mild disagreement or naïve questions.
  • Uses ridicule to handle discomfort rather than analysis or humor.
  • Reflects reactivity, not authority — emotionally volatile people tend to lose influence long-term.

4. Performative Hyper-Masculinity​

  • Leans on exaggerated dominance, status flexing, and hostility to display strength.
  • The behavior is performative — strength displayed instead of embodied.
  • Ironically signals insecurity: confident people don’t need to constantly remind others they’re confident.

5. Tunnel Vision​

  • Nearly all posts orbit looks, body, or hierarchy.
  • Rarely demonstrates multi-domain thinking (career, relationships, mindset, creativity).
  • Suggests high specialization but low versatility — strong within one frame, weak outside it.

6. Inconsistent Standards​

  • Praises some users as “good base” then mocks others for similar traits — meaning judgment depends on status or personal bias.
  • May confuse aesthetic evaluation with social signaling.
  • Leads to a credibility gap — his “ratings” feel arbitrary rather than grounded.

7. Echo-Chamber Dependence​

  • Reinforces the same cultural script (HTN > CL > MTN hierarchies, “ascension,” etc.).
  • Rarely challenges the group’s ideology, suggesting he needs community validation.
  • Without dissent or new models, thought stagnates — intelligence becomes circular.

8. Hostile Communication Style​

  • Constant aggression alienates intelligent posters who value nuance.
  • Eventually limits his reach to only those who tolerate hostility.
  • Makes him appear more like an enforcer than a thinker.

9. Projection of Insecurity​

  • The constant policing of others’ “bases,” “ratios,” and “looksmax progress” hints at self-comparison.
  • Mocking others can be a defense mechanism against internal dissatisfaction.
  • Often, those obsessed with hierarchy are fighting to stay relevant within it.

10. Fragile Social Capital​

  • Reputation depends on maintaining the persona — not genuine respect.
  • If he stops posting or softens his tone, influence likely drops fast.
  • This is the mark of fragile authority — loud respect, quiet insecurity.

11. Low Constructive Output​

  • Rarely produces deep analytical or instructive posts (guides, breakdowns, frameworks).
  • Mostly reactive — comments on others rather than building original insight.
  • Strong reactors can dominate threads short-term but fade long-term without substance.

12. Zero-Sum Worldview​

  • Views status, looks, and validation as limited resources.
  • Operates under “if others rise, I fall.”
  • Prevents collaboration or meaningful social growth — locks him in endless competition.

13. Intellectual Narrowness​

  • Despite clear intelligence in aesthetics, his thinking style is more mechanical than abstract.
  • Focused on measurable ratios rather than conceptual understanding (e.g., self-image, perception, psychology).
  • This makes his advice rigid and unscalable beyond the forum environment.

14. Vulnerability to Burnout / Nihilism​

  • Forum veterans with his style often become jaded or nihilistic when the “HTN chase” plateaus.
  • Because identity is tied to progress and dominance, stagnation = identity crisis.
  • Many similar users end up withdrawing, becoming bitter, or leaving after losing motivation.

15. Lack of Long-Term Vision​

  • No visible strategy beyond looksmaxing and gym.
  • No philosophical or lifestyle integration — just repetition of one domain.
  • Limits personal evolution; success becomes cyclical rather than exponential.
Click to expand...
where's it even pulled half of this from :lasereyes:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: tunisianropemaxxer and FramePillGymMaxx
ChatGPT says I’m a dominant, combative, polarizing figure who is very blunt. And I look to be influential by force and not charm. You think that’s true?
 
  • +1
Reactions: FramePillGymMaxx
HTNGrevious said:

he wouldn't stop talking about my 'weaknesses' so I asked him to make a list didnt expect it to be 15 fucking reasons long​

​

⚠️ Full List of HTNgrevious’s Weaknesses​

1. Overreliance on Provocation​

  • Frequently uses insults or mockery (“retard,” “fuck the rest,” etc.) to assert dominance.
  • This creates a tough-guy persona but undermines credibility and emotional control.
  • Often dismisses opposing views instead of debating them — a sign of insecurity disguised as confidence.

2. Identity Overlap With Forum Culture​

  • Appears deeply tied to the Looksmax.org ecosystem.
  • Self-described focus: “I literally don’t think about anything but looksmaxxing and the gym.”
  • This level of identification suggests narrow psychological bandwidth — little variety in worldview, values, or personal fulfillment.

3. Lack of Emotional Regulation​

  • Responds aggressively to mild disagreement or naïve questions.
  • Uses ridicule to handle discomfort rather than analysis or humor.
  • Reflects reactivity, not authority — emotionally volatile people tend to lose influence long-term.

4. Performative Hyper-Masculinity​

  • Leans on exaggerated dominance, status flexing, and hostility to display strength.
  • The behavior is performative — strength displayed instead of embodied.
  • Ironically signals insecurity: confident people don’t need to constantly remind others they’re confident.

5. Tunnel Vision​

  • Nearly all posts orbit looks, body, or hierarchy.
  • Rarely demonstrates multi-domain thinking (career, relationships, mindset, creativity).
  • Suggests high specialization but low versatility — strong within one frame, weak outside it.

6. Inconsistent Standards​

  • Praises some users as “good base” then mocks others for similar traits — meaning judgment depends on status or personal bias.
  • May confuse aesthetic evaluation with social signaling.
  • Leads to a credibility gap — his “ratings” feel arbitrary rather than grounded.

7. Echo-Chamber Dependence​

  • Reinforces the same cultural script (HTN > CL > MTN hierarchies, “ascension,” etc.).
  • Rarely challenges the group’s ideology, suggesting he needs community validation.
  • Without dissent or new models, thought stagnates — intelligence becomes circular.

8. Hostile Communication Style​

  • Constant aggression alienates intelligent posters who value nuance.
  • Eventually limits his reach to only those who tolerate hostility.
  • Makes him appear more like an enforcer than a thinker.

9. Projection of Insecurity​

  • The constant policing of others’ “bases,” “ratios,” and “looksmax progress” hints at self-comparison.
  • Mocking others can be a defense mechanism against internal dissatisfaction.
  • Often, those obsessed with hierarchy are fighting to stay relevant within it.

10. Fragile Social Capital​

  • Reputation depends on maintaining the persona — not genuine respect.
  • If he stops posting or softens his tone, influence likely drops fast.
  • This is the mark of fragile authority — loud respect, quiet insecurity.

11. Low Constructive Output​

  • Rarely produces deep analytical or instructive posts (guides, breakdowns, frameworks).
  • Mostly reactive — comments on others rather than building original insight.
  • Strong reactors can dominate threads short-term but fade long-term without substance.

12. Zero-Sum Worldview​

  • Views status, looks, and validation as limited resources.
  • Operates under “if others rise, I fall.”
  • Prevents collaboration or meaningful social growth — locks him in endless competition.

13. Intellectual Narrowness​

  • Despite clear intelligence in aesthetics, his thinking style is more mechanical than abstract.
  • Focused on measurable ratios rather than conceptual understanding (e.g., self-image, perception, psychology).
  • This makes his advice rigid and unscalable beyond the forum environment.

14. Vulnerability to Burnout / Nihilism​

  • Forum veterans with his style often become jaded or nihilistic when the “HTN chase” plateaus.
  • Because identity is tied to progress and dominance, stagnation = identity crisis.
  • Many similar users end up withdrawing, becoming bitter, or leaving after losing motivation.

15. Lack of Long-Term Vision​

  • No visible strategy beyond looksmaxing and gym.
  • No philosophical or lifestyle integration — just repetition of one domain.
  • Limits personal evolution; success becomes cyclical rather than exponential.
Click to expand...
DNR
 
  • Woah
  • JFL
Reactions: FramePillGymMaxx and HTNGrevious
BigBoy said:
ChatGPT says I’m a dominant, combative, polarizing figure who is very blunt. And I look to be influential by force and not charm. You think that’s true?
Click to expand...
Idk
I can say u are pretty cool tho
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: BigBoy and WhyNotMe??
did you tell it about the forum or did it know itself?
also ask it to tell you in detail about the beliefs of framepillgymmax and unstable.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FramePillGymMaxx
unstable said:
did you tell it about the forum or did it know itself?
also ask it to tell you in detail about the beliefs of framepillgymmax and unstable.
Click to expand...
I think she knew by herself i didnt talk to that gpt be4 a sec and ill tell u
 
  • +1
Reactions: unstable
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

FramePillGymMaxx
Discussion What is the pillar that holds ur life rn?
Replies
40
Views
302
Foreverbrad
Foreverbrad
FramePillGymMaxx
JFL Ngas be making a thread about anything these days😭😭😭
Replies
21
Views
176
FramePillGymMaxx
FramePillGymMaxx
FramePillGymMaxx
LifeFuel I tried being more socializing in class, i made it!
Replies
19
Views
138
FramePillGymMaxx
FramePillGymMaxx
FramePillGymMaxx
Whats your goal in life?
2
Replies
80
Views
581
GhostBoySwag
GhostBoySwag
FramePillGymMaxx
Over So my hymen was tore the whole time....?
Replies
25
Views
234
FramePillGymMaxx
FramePillGymMaxx

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxers: 0, Bluepillers: 2)
Back
Top