What description must a user fit, for his rating to be accurate

[Avagar Nexus]

And who are the most accurate raters, cause you see different ratings, with a lot of variation, for the same person.

(Assuming the raters also know how to translate the rating to irl experience, which should be by default if they know the rating scale well)

 

[zygosmasher]

what does this post even mean, if youre asking how to raters come up with scores, they just go off the golden ratios and figure out how far the person deviates from those, theres also dimorphism, angularity etc.

 

[Avagar Nexus]

what does this post even mean, if youre asking how to raters come up with scores, they just go off the golden ratios and figure out how far the person deviates from those, theres also dimorphism, angularity etc.

You can’t be serious right?

 

[zygosmasher]

You can’t be serious right?

oh wait i misread the post, i thought u meant how do raters rate faces, mb. i guess just previous ratings and reputation in the com

 

[Avagar Nexus]

oh wait i misread the post, i thought u meant how do raters rate faces, mb. i guess just previous ratings and reputation in the com

Yeah previous ratings kind of works, but that take too much time tbh, and doing it for many users, rep meh maybe. Does bring an older user count, like 2+ years

 

[zygosmasher]

Yeah previous ratings kind of works, but that take too much time tbh, and doing it for many users, rep meh maybe. Does bring an older user count, like 2+ years

yeah i would say so, but then again a lot of people are trolls, its better just to get the median of whatever the majority says tbh, or just do it yourself comparing to golden ratios and measurements, theres a lot of info out there about optimals

 

[Avagar Nexus]

yeah i would say so, but then again a lot of people are trolls, its better just to get the median of whatever the majority says tbh, or just do it yourself comparing to golden ratios and measurements, theres a lot of info out there about optimals

I’d be shocked if even 1% does actually follow the ratio guidelines and then gives a rate. It’s actually the contrary I’d say. So mostly like just take a look your mind makes a decision, then you see why does this person look that way and then you analyze some of it according to the ratios . Which isn’t that bad tbh, but it’s more flawed maybe

 

[zygosmasher]

I’d be shocked if even 1% does actually follow the ratio guidelines and then gives a rate. It’s actually the contrary I’d say. So mostly like just take a look your mind makes a decision, then you see why does this person look that way and then you analyze some of it according to the ratios . Which isn’t that bad tbh, but it’s more flawed maybe

yeah but i mean 95% of people dont know how to rate properly. although it might be better because its just based off initial attractiveness, so basically how everyone in real life will view you. not 1 person on earth goes around in real life comparing you to golden ratios

 

[Avagar Nexus]

yeah but i mean 95% of people dont know how to rate properly. although it might be better because its just based off initial attractiveness, so basically how everyone in real life will view you. not 1 person on earth goes around in real life comparing you to golden ratios

Yes, in that sense I do like it more then the actual scale, but you still get the male perception, the female view misses, but you still get something which is somewhat not very far from the female view. But then again wouldn’t the opinion of any user the equally valid. To which you might say if they know what the scale even means, cause many users don’t even know what the “avarage” is on the scale

 

[shngstaaaa107]

I’d be shocked if even 1% does actually follow the ratio guidelines and then gives a rate. It’s actually the contrary I’d say. So mostly like just take a look your mind makes a decision, then you see why does this person look that way and then you analyze some of it according to the ratios . Which isn’t that bad tbh, but it’s more flawed maybe

a lot of those ratio analyses are paywalled. otherwise, you can use ai or do a little measurement yourself, I heard faceiq ai does ratio measurement pretty well. Most ratios are visible to the human eye, a difference of around maybe 10-20% from the norm can usually be seen with the naked eye. the average user can use this to find your facial flaws and how they would add up and contribute to how your skull or face appears to the average person without much thought.

 

[zygosmasher]

Yes, in that sense I do like it more then the actual scale, but you still get the male perception, the female view misses, but you still get something which is somewhat not very far from the female view. But then again wouldn’t the opinion of any user the equally valid. To which you might say if they know what the scale even means, cause many users don’t even know what the “avarage” is on the scale

yeah i think so but the problem are trolls or people that downplay you to boost their own egos, so you need to take that into account ofcourse, but probably the median of the plausible ratings are what youre generally viewed as. i will say that potential is extremely hard to judge though, if someone says u can only jump 1 teir or 10 teirs, is bullshit, because its impossible to know until all is said and done

 

[Avagar Nexus]

a lot of those ratio analyses are paywalled. otherwise, you can use ai or do a little measurement yourself, I heard faceiq ai does ratio measurement pretty well. Most ratios are visible to the human eye, a difference of around maybe 10-20% from the norm can usually be seen with the naked eye. the average user can use this to find your facial flaws and how they would add up and contribute to how your skull or face appears to the average person without much thought.

Makes sense, if the flaw is very noticeable you can point it out. Take for example delon or texiera. You could say recessed infra, or slightly not ideal nose to mouth ratio. Sometimes there are falios, yet they work together, somehow. You could have the same falio in a LTN and in Delon. You could say delon compensates with other stuff, but I think for halos, can you point them out as easy as falios?

 

[Avagar Nexus]

yeah i think so but the problem are trolls or people that downplay you to boost their own egos, so you need to take that into account ofcourse, but probably the median of the plausible ratings are what youre generally viewed as. i will say that potential is extremely hard to judge though, if someone says u can only jump 1 teir or 10 teirs, is bullshit, because its impossible to know until all is said and done

But it can go the other way around too. Some people boost people that resemble them, or that have similair pheno, or ethnicity to them. But potential I agree, it’s a bit different. But if there’s “potential”, it’s easy to fix and you just say do such and such and such, and you are at this rating

 

[zygosmasher]

But it can go the other way around too. Some people boost people that resemble them, or that have similair pheno, or ethnicity to them. But potential I agree, it’s a bit different. But if there’s “potential”, it’s easy to fix and you just say do such and such and such, and you are at this rating

true, i guess you just never really know, results speak for themselves i guess, if ur pulling stacys and getting rated ltn, then clearly somethings not right, if youre an incel and getting rated htn, then that just speaks for itself

 

[Avagar Nexus]

true, i guess you just never really know, results speak for themselves i guess, if ur pulling stacys and getting rated ltn, then clearly somethings not right, if youre an incel and getting rated htn, then that just speaks for itself

Yeah absolutely life experiences tell, although there are cases though, being ND and NT does play a role

 

[Sadist]

u just kinda go around and see whose rates high-rep/knowledgeable people agree the most. that and just asking other users if someones a good rater works. it goes deeper than that, but thats the general idea.

 

[Avagar Nexus]

u just kinda go around and see whose rates high-rep/knowledgeable people agree the most. that and just asking other users if someones a good rater works. it goes deeper than that, but thats the general idea.

Evaluating the evaluators, based on evaluations

 

[Sadist]

Evaluating the evaluators, based on evaluations

precisely