Sure but "you haven't eliminated every conceivable variable isnt the same as identifying a plausible alternative. If you cant point to an actual contamination or human intervention mechanism supported by evidence, then you're just appealing to hypothetical possibilities. At a point unexplained evidence has to be weighed against the explanations actually available.
That wasn’t my point, it was that religion was created by humans to cope with the fear and aftermath of death
ok, either way your point does not prove anything about my religion.. saying people invented it to cope with death is a genetic fallacy even if a belief comforts people that says nothing about whether the belief is true. if you want to disprove christianity ( which you cant ) you need to start addressing its historical and philosophical claims
ya bro ur all loving god throws the people he created in hell which mind u by the religion he already knows where your going to end up in life and afterlife so whats the point in the first place
