What do you guys consider to be the most aesthetic height?

Piratecel

Piratecel

Luminary
Joined
Dec 3, 2021
Posts
5,921
Reputation
9,516
Personally I think a high 6'1/low 6'2 (187/188cm) is the most sexy height because it looks the best when lean/muscular. Any height higher than 6'3 looks lanky and ugly as fuck. Personally I would never wanna be any height higher than 6'2. What do you think?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Myth
6’2

In b4 7 foot or death faggots
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16369, MOGGERR and Piratecel
6'2.5''
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: cornerd nerd, Deleted member 16530, Piratecel and 1 other person
You cant call yourself tall if ur below 6'3
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • WTF
Reactions: Deleted member 15827, Frank Jack, gamma and 2 others
@LooksOverAll
 
6’4” with good frame mogs
 
You cant call yourself tall if ur below 6'3
Too tall looks ugly, saw many guys above 6'3 downtown and they all looked lanky and ugly
6’4” with good frame mogs
6'4 with good frame is hard to find. 6'2 with good frame still looks more aesthetic, just much more pleasant to look at.
 
6'10

i have like 4 guys in my school 6'5-6'6 so id get mogged if i chose 6'4
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15827
6'1, 6'2 with a good frame.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Piratecel
Anything between 180-185cm:Comfy:
 
About 6'5(1.95-6m) with long limbs and wide shoulders is perfect. You will never get rejected for not being tall enough and you should almost never get rejected for being too tall. You'll stand out in a good way(as long as you have an aesthetic frame like the one I described) but will be far off from "freak" territory.
 
  • Love it
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 9003, DivineBeing and Deleted member 9819
About 6'5(1.95-6m) with long limbs and wide shoulders is perfect. You will never get rejected for not being tall enough and you should almost never get rejected for being too tall. You'll stand out in a good way(as long as you have an aesthetic frame like the one I described) but will be far off from "freak" territory.
1.95 is 6'4 not 6'5
 
10C37998 EFF2 4BDD 84B1 6EEFD3589CFC

7’2 like Oliver Richters

lankletcopers on suiwatch
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member
6'2, 6'4 and 6'6 sound the most aesthetic
 
  • +1
Reactions: DivineBeing
6’2 barefoot, long limbs and good frame :ogre:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16530
Obviously 5'9 like Stallone
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot
6'3-6'5.

After 6'5 then it's like you better be in some kind of sport or it's like what are you doing with your life.
 
6’2 clothes just look weird af on guys who are under 5’11 or 6’
 
View attachment 1481420
7’2 like Oliver Richters

lankletcopers on suiwatch
Looks like he belongs in a circus
Its probably your face
People on that height usually have good proportions
Face isn't the problem foids call me "cute" my proportions aren't bad either, the main problem is it doesn't have that same spark a 6'2 guy has. Take your profile picture for example, if zyzz wasn't 6'2 or if he was much taller like 6'5 he wouldn't have blown up any near as much as did I am certain of that. He even said on the body building forum he was the perfect height for girls he was 187 cm.
 
In my opinion it's 6'4
 
7ft dead srs
 
Tough call, honestly. I think anything from 6'1" to 6'5" is really good with limb to torso ratios being anywhere from relatively average (like 6'1" Steve Reeves) to limbs being considerably longer than normal (like 6'5" Michael Jordan).
 

Similar threads

Quatza33
Replies
42
Views
196
recessedinfras1
recessedinfras1
Ecdysial
Replies
8
Views
48
occipital
occipital
Diasoi_Chamber
Replies
26
Views
125
joshwashere
joshwashere
botchedbytufano
Replies
5
Views
70
arx
arx
Iamspace
Replies
1
Views
27
Iamspace
Iamspace

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →