What do you think was the average PSL/Rating of a hunter gatherer male 15,000+ years ago?

[e1_xz]

title

 

[KYS RETARD COPERS]

8 PSL

 

[xela2008]

2 maybe

 

[MaracasMogs]

5
they had huge skulls which would be considered unattractive tday

 

[e1_xz]

5
they had huge skulls whiwh would be considered unattractive tday

Fair

 

[psychopathic]

Let's be honest they weren't all 9.9 PSL Gods with de Poot like faces who were all 6'10" they probably looked like really high dimo ogres

 

[e1_xz]

Let's be honest they weren't all 9.9 PSL Gods with de Poot like faces who were all 6'10" they probably looked like really high dimo ogres

Wasn't suggesting that, I think that the average male back then was a HTN though.

 

[e1_xz]

Let's be honest they weren't all 9.9 PSL Gods with de Poot like faces who were all 6'10" they probably looked like really high dimo ogres

Good point though, defo high dimo

 

[psychopathic]

Wasn't suggesting that, I think that the average male back then was a HTN though.

HTN

 

[e1_xz]

View attachment 3976706

HTN

Doesn't even look that bad lol, and how does this single image with no context provide any evidence that most males back then looked similar to this?

 

[e1_xz]

View attachment 3976706

HTN

He's just hairy as fuck

 

[lurking truecel]

Chad

 

[actual9cmjawslayer]

they were uglier than average person now

 

[Deleted member 175542]

3

 

[e1_xz]

they were uglier than average person now

What makes you think this
I disagree

 

[actual9cmjawslayer]

What makes you think this
I disagree

because environment has no impact on bone structure and there was less facial attractiveness genetic selection during mating than in the future/now