What does everyone think about the r/truerateme rating scales?

D

Deleted member 30037

Scholar
Joined
May 22, 2023
Posts
5,308
Reputation
7,363
r/truerateme is a subreddit forum where they rate people "accurately" who post photos of themselves

These are their rating scales for men and women

OPINIONS?

MEN


1702556392475





WOMEN



1702556482906
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6583 and Nick.Harte
The top percentiles are skewed heavily in ethnic people's favour. The middle and low end of the scales are accurate but after like 7+ the whites in the the scales start mogging their ethnic counterparts hard.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime, zura, ElTruecel and 5 others
The top percentiles are skewed heavily in ethnic people's favour. The middle and low end of the scales are accurate but after like 7+ the whites in the the scales start mogging their ethnic counterparts hard.
I was looking at the scale for both, and I thought some of the 6/7 whites looked far better than the 8/9 ethnics too. Thought it was just me
 
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime, Deleted member 6583, Deleted member 13710 and 2 others
Flawed and too many ethnics
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: LampPostPrime, bleachmaxxer69, Deleted member 13710 and 2 others
I was looking at the scale for both, and I thought some of the 6/7 whites looked far better than the 8/9 ethnics too. Thought it was just me
same
 
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime and Deleted member 30037
they have no scale they just give 4-6/10 to everyone and circlejerk how that must mean they're objective and brutally honest :geek: :lul:
there's a thread on this forum with one r/TRM thread where they gave average of 5.8 to a literal model stacy who posted there JFL
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 31971 and Deleted member 30037
they have no scale they just give 4-6/10 to everyone and circlejerk how that must mean they're objective and brutally honest :geek: :lul:
there's a thread on this forum with one r/TRM thread where they gave average of 5.8 to a literal model stacy who posted there JFL
I've never seen them give someone a 7 or higher unironically lmao. It's like they just want to give people an average rating meanwhile the people on the rating scale at that level aren't even GL
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6583
The top percentiles are skewed heavily in ethnic people's favour.
True

they have no scale they just give 4-6/10 to everyone and circlejerk how that must mean they're objective and brutally honest :geek: :lul:
Also true

It's a way of incels to gaslight attractive women. Some have essentially admitted as much. Worthless scale. The 1-10 scale should have an average of 5/10 for non-fat people and have a standard deviation of 1.5 (so 7/10 is top 10%, and 3/10 is bottom 10%). Obviously racial differences would make it tricky to apply cross-culturally
 
why the fuck is Tim Chung rated higher than Chico?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: LampPostPrime, bleachmaxxer69, ElTruecel and 1 other person
they're utterly retarded. it infuriates me knowing there's someone out there that fucking stupid. how fucking bad at processing information do you have to be to think that every 1 in 15 guys looks like this:

actor-sukru-ozyildiz-532001_small.jpg


this is probably the most retarded one though. every 2 out of 3 women is BETTER looking than this woman:



some faggot on reddit was actually arguing with me that that's the case
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30037
r/truerateme is r/incels disguised as a rating sub
 
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime and Deleted member 30037
  • +1
Reactions: LampPostPrime and FrameMogger
Too inconsistent and weird with some people
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30037

Similar threads

IHATEINDIANS
Replies
12
Views
248
Deleted member 139575
D
The Homelander
Replies
14
Views
228
Stewart.Belgrade
Stewart.Belgrade
Changmentum
Replies
3
Views
110
ThisCat
ThisCat
Cleetus Cornfield
Replies
2
Views
60
BWC_virgin
BWC_virgin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top