Deleted member 14978
Diamond
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2021
- Posts
- 1,388
- Reputation
- 2,481
I can’t figure it out. It looks like he has a fairly masculine jaw.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
he doesnt have anyhis epicanthal folds
r u joking?he doesnt have any
His medial canthus is very visibler u joking?
he clearly has epicanthal folds at his medial canthus which cover it
His medial canthus is very visible
View attachment 1323304
vs epicanthic folds
View attachment 1323305View attachment 1323311View attachment 1323307View attachment 1323312
epicanthic fold is just the inner part that covers the medial canthusView attachment 1323316View attachment 1323317View attachment 1323318
there's a difference between epicanthal folds and monolids
the guy has very small ones but they r visible espacially in motion
View attachment 1323323
this is zero epicanthal folds
His medial canthus is very visible
View attachment 1323304
vs epicanthic folds
View attachment 1323305View attachment 1323311View attachment 1323307View attachment 1323312
Barrett and Opry have pretty small epicanthal folds compared to Lawrence and the other womanepicanthic fold is just the inner part that covers the medial canthus
the pictures i sent dont have monolids but hooded + epicanthic fold
his epicanthic fold is very faint, barely anything out of average
yeah those were cherrypicked photos to illustrate, theirs arent very promient generally, only in very few photos likeBarrett and Opry have pretty small epicanthal folds compared to Lawrence and the other woman
his is small indeed but on the eye area small features can have a big effect and I think lacking a sharp medial canthus contributes to a little babyface although he's a chadlite facially
His medial canthus is very visible
View attachment 1323304
vs epicanthic folds
View attachment 1323305View attachment 1323311View attachment 1323307View attachment 1323312