What group of people have the highest racial self esteem

So @horseman. and @ICXCLuvr you believe child rape , pedophilia , pedophilia etc is ok?
 
"We Wuz errythang in human history"

1785734627137
 
If something benefits me, I’ll do it. Things like being fair doesn’t really cross my mind in decision making. I’m aware that’s not “logical” by your standards but idrc
LMFAOOOOO
Then you’re basically admitting you’re not arguing that your actions are morally right—you’re just saying you’ll do whatever benefits you. That’s personal preference, not a moral argument. If you don’t care about fairness or other people’s suffering, you can say that, but you still haven’t explained why your interests should matter more than anyone else’s.
 
Tbh this og2019 nigga cooking but I understand both sides

Of course it’s advantageous to say “everyone who isn’t in my life can choke on a cock!” And not have tons of sympathy, your life may be objectively “better” as a result

But

This won’t work for like 99% of people probably including OP, although I can’t say for certain because I don’t know him, because most people will be confronted by their own guilt before they do harmful things

Humans are emotional and empathetic creatures, at the end of the day most don’t have the stomach to do truly immoral things. It’s much easier to write about it online than keep up the act for your entire life.
Exactly thank you , these weirdo Think child rape, pedophilia etc is ok
Retard pov
being selfish can sometimes benefit me” ≠ “therefore I should abandon morality
 
  • +1
Reactions: Light•
So @horseman. and @ICXCLuvr you believe child rape , pedophilia , pedophilia etc is ok?
just because I don’t believe in objective morality doesn’t mean I’m evil
 
  • +1
Reactions: pleasevanity and horseman.
LMFAOOOOO
Then you’re basically admitting you’re not arguing that your actions are morally right—you’re just saying you’ll do whatever benefits you. That’s personal preference, not a moral argument. If you don’t care about fairness or other people’s suffering, you can say that, but you still haven’t explained why your interests should matter more than anyone else’s.
Correct, I was never making a moral argument. I just don’t need to justify why I matter more than someone else before I do something “wrong”. If I want to do it, I will. Moral cucks like you just make rule breaking easier
 
  • +1
Reactions: pleasevanity and ICXCLuvr
don’t need religion to believe in objective morality. I base my morals on rational principles like human well being, harm, consent, fairness, and consistency. Moral dilemmas aren’t solved by a literal spreadsheet you weigh the relevant principles and consequences. And being atheist doesn’t logically mean you hav to be amoral.
Doesn’t mean it’s objective. It’s what YOU personally think is right.
 
just because I don’t believe in objective morality doesn’t mean I’m evil
Do you feel anger if someone hurts you, do you feel sympathy when you see a family member crying
KNOWING THESE EMOTIONS BUT DOWNPLAYING IT For other situations make you worse then evil
Correct, I was never making a moral argument. I just don’t need to justify why I matter more than someone else before I do something “wrong”. If I want to do it, I will
but then you’re not really arguing that your actions are morally right you’re saying morality simply isn’t a factor in your decisions. You can choose to live that way, but “I want to” only explains your motivationit doesn’t justify why harming someone is acceptable.
 
Correct, I was never making a moral argument. I just don’t need to justify why I matter more than someone else before I do something “wrong”. If I want to do it, I will. Moral cucks like you just make rule breaking easier
I understand this to an extent but in the context of the thread, calling rape murder and pedophelia etc high T bc it’s “self interest” is just retarded

I can get behind this if it comes to crimes like fraud, RICO, or whatever

But rape and pedophelia is just a vile act
 
  • +1
Reactions: pleasevanity and Looksmax.meOg2019
Do you feel anger if someone hurts you, do you feel sympathy when you see a family member crying
KNOWING THESE EMOTIONS BUT DOWNPLAYING IT For other situations make you worse then evil

but then you’re not really arguing that your actions are morally right you’re saying morality simply isn’t a factor in your decisions. You can choose to live that way, but “I want to” only explains your motivationit doesn’t justify why harming someone is acceptable.
I never never justifying my actions, I know they’re wrong but I don’t care.
 
Do you feel anger if someone hurts you, do you feel sympathy when you see a family member crying
KNOWING THESE EMOTIONS BUT DOWNPLAYING IT For other situations make you worse then evil
I couldn’t objectively punish someone for doing something wrong. It would just be by my own standard and the one commonly shared around me. It’s not a fact of reality.
 
Doesn’t mean it’s objective. It’s what YOU personally think is right.
Lmfao That’s exactly the distinction. If you believe morality is subjective, then “right” means what you personally value not an objective fact. If you value family or life itself then shouldn’t your moral reflect that if your have female relationship isn’t it fair to say you wouldn’t want them raped??
 
I couldn’t objectively punish someone for doing something wrong. It would just be by my own standard and the one commonly shared around me. It’s not a fact of reality.
My point is that “not objectively true” doesn’t automatically make morality false or meaningless . You can reject objective morality while still having subjective reasons to value consent, suffering, fairness, etc. The disagreement is really about whether moral facts existnot whether you personally follow them
 
Lmfao That’s exactly the distinction. If you believe morality is subjective, then “right” means what you personally value not an objective fact. If you value family or life itself then shouldn’t your moral reflect that if your have female relationship isn’t it fair to say you wouldn’t want them raped??
Yeah. But you can’t objectively prove anything is wrong without an underlying value underneath. That’s why it’s not fully objective
 
My point is that “not objectively true” doesn’t automatically make morality false or meaningless . You can reject objective morality while still having subjective reasons to value consent, suffering, fairness, etc. The disagreement is really about whether moral facts existnot whether you personally follow them
I have subjective morals horseman does not care about morality
 
I never never justifying my actions, I know they’re wrong but I don’t care.
If someone harms you and you say “that’s wrong,” but when you harm someone else you say “I don’t care,” you ally different standardsdepending on who benefits. You can consistently reject objective morality but then you can’t pretend your personal standard is objectively bind on anyone else.
 
I have subjective morals horseman does not care about morality
Saying “I know it’s wrong but I don’t care” doesn’t make the issue disappear. If you admit something is wrong, you’re already using some standard to call it wrong. You can argue that morality isn’t objectively real, but then you can’t just treat “wrong” like it has any meaning beyond your own or society’s standards.
 
I have subjective morals horseman does not care about morality
But rape and child porn is ok
:forcedsmile:
Your subjective morality is the same as no morals
You accepts vile acts
 
But rape and child porn is ok
:forcedsmile:
Your subjective morality is the same as no morals
You accepts vile acts
When did I say either of those were okay:hnghn: horseman didn’t either he said he acted more out of self interest.
 
  • +1
Reactions: horseman.
Saying “I know it’s wrong but I don’t care” doesn’t make the issue disappear. If you admit something is wrong, you’re already using some standard to call it wrong. You can argue that morality isn’t objectively real, but then you can’t just treat “wrong” like it has any meaning beyond your own or society’s standards.
I fully agree with you, But your argument only works on people who actually care about objectivity or fairness. I know it’s not objective but I don’t care because it’ll benefit me lol.
 
When did I say either of those were okay:hnghn: horseman didn’t either he said he acted more out of self interest.
You spew of hypocrisy lmfao earlier you questioned my subjective morality but now claim yours
I fully agree with you, But your argument only works on people who actually care about objectivity or fairness. I know it’s not objective but I don’t care because it’ll benefit me lol.
That’s the problem though. You’re treating “it benefits me” as enough reason to do something, but that’s not an argument for why you should do it. If your only standard is self interest, then you’re basically saying I’ll do what benefits me regardless of whether it harms someone else. That’s logically consistent but it’s alsojust egoism not a justification for the action.
 
You spew of hypocrisy lmfao earlier you questioned my subjective morality but now claim yours

That’s the problem though. You’re treating “it benefits me” as enough reason to do something, but that’s not an argument for why you should do it. If your only standard is self interest, then you’re basically saying I’ll do what benefits me regardless of whether it harms someone else. That’s logically consistent but it’s alsojust egoism not a justification for the action.
You don’t get it, I’m not even arguing with you, you are right and I don’t care. I’ll still do what I want guilt free. I don’t feel the urge to justify stuff
 
When did I say either of those were okay:hnghn: horseman didn’t either he said he acted more out of self interest.
You need to get his dick out your mouth @ICXCLuvr
IMG 2393

Here he is quoting THESE vile act as high test
 
Last edited:
You don’t get it, I’m not even arguing with you, you are right and I don’t care. I’ll still do what I want guilt free. I don’t feel the urge to justify stuff
You say you don’t care about morality and would do whatever benefits you, but then you call child rape, pedophilia, and other vile shit “high test.” That’s not just rejecting objective morality anymoreyou’re attaching a positive value to those acts. If you genuinely just don’t care about morality, why label them as desirable or “high test” in the first place?
:forcedsmile::forcedsmile:
 
You say you don’t care about morality and would do whatever benefits you, but then you call child rape, pedophilia, and other vile shit “high test.” That’s not just rejecting objective morality anymoreyou’re attaching a positive value to those acts. If you genuinely just don’t care about morality, why label them as desirable or “high test” in the first place?
:forcedsmile::forcedsmile:
The high t thing was a joke as seen by the emojis I used lol. I’m just neutral about stuff like that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
The high t thing was a joke as seen by the emojis I used lol. I’m just neutral about stuff like that.
Ah joking about child rape/pedophilia very high iq
 
Bro u are the exact same
How If you show me a screen shot as treating child rape as a postive I’ll gift you lifetime VIP I’ve only treated rape AND only rape as an insult therefore a negative how am I the same if Im Cooking you 2 stupid niggas about obvious facts about how child rape is bad
 
stop moralfagging, we can find shit on u too. Things that aren’t even jokes. Like ur rant earlier. I’m sure that’s morally justified
It is explain how it isn’t? Was any of my quotes wrong ? Everything I stated is correct your defending child rape there’s a Clear difference between biased racism and CHILD rape
 
stop moralfagging, we can find shit on u too. Things that aren’t even jokes. Like ur rant earlier. I’m sure that’s morally justified
It is explain how it isn’t? Was any of my quotes wrong ? Everything I stated is correct your defending child rape there’s a Clear difference between biased racism and CHILD rape
He used to have a Hitler avi btw😂
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
rape jokes = wrong

Genocide = good

Moralfags man😂
@Looksmax.meOg2019 is the genocide of Jewish women and children something morally okay? I’d say killing children is on the same level as child rape
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
@Looksmax.meOg2019 is the genocide of Jewish women and children something morally okay? I’d say killing children is on the same level as child rape
I think your a retard I made a thread of the reason why
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
I think your a retard I made a thread of the reason why
I read your thread, none of that justifies the genocide of Jewish women and children who had nothing to do with what’s happening in Palestine right now. You are just as bad as me lmao @ICXCLuvr
 
  • +1
Reactions: pleasevanity and ICXCLuvr
I read your thread, none of that justifies the genocide of Jewish women and children who had nothing to do with what’s happening in Palestine right now. You are just as bad as me lmao @ICXCLuvr
get Many questions I’m reposting what I said before hand because it to much work writing it again
the reason I have a hitler pfp is because I have A deep hatred for Jews because of The millions of Palestine kids adults etc dying every second while American tax dollar is funding that

In no way shape or form am I saying the holocaust or anything that harmed the millions of Jew during his tyranny was correct I’m Against him in all forms

I just use the pfp to express my hatred for Jews of today who support Israel genocide

For the Jews that haven’t done anything I don’t have a hatred for them, it’s just overall the same way African Americans are responsible for 8/10 crimes so when you see one you instinctively react
I have a instinctively Sympathy for a Palestine when I see them suffering and crying due to Jewish persecution
Genocide is worse than rape. And even if it wasn’t, it’s still wrong. No?
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
I read your thread, none of that justifies the genocide of Jewish women and children who had nothing to do with what’s happening in Palestine right now. You are just as bad as me lmao @ICXCLuvr
See what I mean your a fucking retard I stated Multiple times I was against the genocide and if your amoral you should gaf
 
See what I mean your a fucking retard I stated Multiple times I was against the genocide and if your amoral you should gaf
You still had the avi even if it is a joke. I’m just using your own logic against you. Dont moral fag over a “high t” joke
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
You still had the avi even if it is a joke. I’m just using your own logic against you. Dont moral fag over a “high t” joke
It wasn’t a joke I stated why I had it?
80%? No.

you can hate zionists without using Hitler (someone who lead a genocide) as a pfp. That’s worse than a rape joke because u somewhat believe it
DNR the whole message explained completely in the reasons why I used it no where near does that mean I support it I directly despised him
That’s the equivalent of you having a Epstein pfp and saying you support human trafficking
 
so you even think you having a hitler avi is justified. This is the same guy moral fagging over rape jokes btw @ICXCLuvr 😂
Well that would be a child rape joke which you condemn right? Why doesn’t that apply for Hitler?

yeah bro I hate Hitler I just have him as my pfp
No it wasn’t but i Clearly stated I was against it and shortly after got rid of it?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: horseman.

Similar threads

Blue Pleidian
Replies
1
Views
50
Roara
Roara
Light•
Replies
4
Views
64
trench
trench
5'5.5 ropecel
Replies
19
Views
269
Tesarossa
Tesarossa
LoneWolfShooter
Replies
14
Views
106
DrRodger
DrRodger
etrnl06
Replies
2
Views
31
tct
tct

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top
    Sponsored
    Stake.us
    America's #1 Social Casino
    Slots, Poker & More
    Join Now →