What % harmony score is good

horseman.

horseman.

looksmaxxer looksmaxing
Joined
Feb 16, 2025
Posts
14,290
Reputation
24,277
title
 
  • +1
Reactions: zombi3, xye, iblamejordan1 and 3 others
Anything below 90% is over
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: xye, iblamejordan1 and horseman.
Its bs pretty much, plenty of normies with 90% but still stuck at mtn and people like zayn malik or ian somerhalder score either below average or 60%

As long as you dont have a major flaw It doesnt matter
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye, iblamejordan1 and horseman.
Idk the exact human average but I’d say 60 and up is good I think?
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye and horseman.
plenty of normies with 90%
laughs cage GIF
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: ltnbrownacnecel, wearegettingtohtn, xye and 4 others
" Gif - funny " :feelstastyman:

Do you even know what high harmony requires, just proportions that are in the optimal range and arent off

Some normies have ideal eye spacing equal facial thirds good convexities, But they dont nail the other aspects

Tiger Woods has like 72% facial harmony even tho hes nowhere near Cl, same with Tom Holland

If you had seen some people on org testing out Faceiqlabs youd know what Im referring to
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye and Light•
" Gif - funny " :feelstastyman:

Do you even know what high harmony requires, just proportions that are in the optimal range and arent off

Some normies have ideal eye spacing equal facial thirds good convexities, But they dont nail the other aspects

Tiger Woods has like 72% facial harmony even tho hes nowhere near Cl, same with Tom Holland

If you had seen some people on org testing out Faceiqlabs youd know what Im referring to
I know what harmony is and can certainly comprehend that even with good harmony one can have other flaws, but to say there’s just normies running around with 90% harmony at MTN is delusional
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye, iblamejordan1 and Mansur
I know what harmony is and can certainly comprehend that even with good harmony one can have other flaws, but to say there’s just normies running around with 90% harmony at MTN is delusional
That doesnt mean that every mf with 90% harmony is Mtn, majority of them are prob Htn+
I was just saying that there are cases where Mtns have very high harmony
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: xye, horseman. and Azi.org
Its bs pretty much, plenty of normies with 90% but still stuck at mtn and people like zayn malik or ian somerhalder score either below average or 60%

As long as you dont have a major flaw It doesnt matter
no there isn’t lol no fucking normie has 90%
 
  • +1
Reactions: horseman. and pfl
Its bs pretty much, plenty of normies with 90% but still stuck at mtn and people like zayn malik or ian somerhalder score either below average or 60%

As long as you dont have a major flaw It doesnt matter
If they’re normie they dont have 90
 
  • +1
Reactions: killuacel and horseman.
" Gif - funny " :feelstastyman:

Do you even know what high harmony requires, just proportions that are in the optimal range and arent off

Some normies have ideal eye spacing equal facial thirds good convexities, But they dont nail the other aspects

Tiger Woods has like 72% facial harmony even tho hes nowhere near Cl, same with Tom Holland

If you had seen some people on org testing out Faceiqlabs youd know what Im referring to
Tiger woods has a dogshit side and his front is nowhere near 72 jfl
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: horseman.
If they’re normie they dont have 90
Tiger woods has a dogshit side and his front is nowhere near 72 jfl
His front has been measured at 72

Normies can have 90 if they have low dimo angularity or misc

And youre the last one Id take advice from lmao, O Connor Htn
 
His front has been measured at 72

Normies can have 90 if they have low dimo angularity or misc

And youre the last one Id take advice from lmao, O Connor Htn
Yeah he’s htn his frontal is 40
You’ve seen nobody with 90 harmony that’s 1 in tens of thousands
 
  • +1
Reactions: ltnbrownacnecel and horseman.
Yeah he’s htn his frontal is 40
You’ve seen nobody with 90 harmony that’s 1 in tens of thousands
There are plenty of mfs who measured their faces on faceiqlabs and got 80, 85 +

Some asian dude who looks mtn or even here on org there was one dude

Again youre forgetting what harmony is

Alone if u nail eye spacing and thirds youre already very high up there since theyre weighted insanely high
 
There are plenty of mfs who measured their faces on faceiqlabs and got 80, 85 +

Some asian dude who looks mtn or even here on org there was one dude

Again youre forgetting what harmony is

Alone if u nail eye spacing and thirds youre already very high up there since theyre weighted insanely high
Yeah because faceiqlabs is horseshit grifter website just fucking lol
Everybody knows it overrates
 
  • +1
Reactions: ltnbrownacnecel
Yeah because faceiqlabs is horseshit grifter website just fucking lol
Everybody knows it overrates
Nigga then what fucking sheet do u use, your own or what lmao

It simply represents your score based off ratios that youre nailing

And about overrating, Its obvious

Thats why Ive said before that Its bs

You will never be able to fully measure the faces harmony using some software, there are billions of ratios to account for
 
And about overrating, Its obvious

Thats why Ive said before that Its bs
obviously it’s gonna be bs looking through the lens of a dogshit software

You will never be able to fully measure the faces harmony using some software, there are billions of ratios to account for
Well people who have good formulas seem to get pretty close of accurately measuring faces
 
obviously it’s gonna be bs looking through the lens of a dogshit software


Well people who have good formulas seem to get pretty close of accurately measuring faces
Ca's is the most accurate one

And additionally adding more ratios to the sheet makes it better

I dont say that because he tolerates more stuff, Ive analysed tons of faces using different sheets and his was the most accurate one

Idk whose sheet youre using, fucking road2onepercent or idk who, they all copied CA pretty much

Normalizing shit like 1.1 to 1 mfr, 48.3% ipd or 1.8 fwhr
 
  • +1
Reactions: pfl
Ca's is the most accurate one

And additionally adding more ratios to the sheet makes it better

I dont say that because he tolerates more stuff, Ive analysed tons of faces using different sheets and his was the most accurate one

Idk whose sheet youre using, fucking road2onepercent or idk who, they all copied CA pretty much

Normalizing shit like 1.1 to 1 mfr, 48.3% ipd or 1.8 fwhr
Yea ca’s mogs but how is harmony cope especially with his formula because i’ve never seen it be inaccurate


And additionally adding more ratios to the sheet makes it better
Not really that just can make it bloated and fuck with scores using ratios that don’t matter and or what it’s measuring can just be put into a separate category like misc
 

Similar threads

SilvioMoltisantiDan
Replies
9
Views
76
sanz
S
M
Replies
11
Views
93
ndslth8r
ndslth8r
BWC_virgin
Replies
4
Views
34
BWC_virgin
BWC_virgin
zurrity
Replies
33
Views
204
d99lotus
d99lotus
Suhaibneedstobechad
Replies
4
Views
46
jimmymogs
jimmymogs

Users who are viewing this thread

  • zombi3
  • miserycel
  • TrueGracileMed
Back
Top