What if good genes theory is a cope

[AsGoodAsItGets]

the niggers that can't get enough vitamin d will be more sickly, weaker, smaller and less healthy overall which means the lighter chad will mog them even if the females had a darker preference initially. female preference usually follows a strong adaptation, if not we're talking about a fisherian runaway which is a combination of males being powerless to enforce their right to breed due to inability to rape (in nature, being incapable of holding down or catching the female (birds); in humans, enforced by society) and a female preference that got way too ingrained and is now difficult to shed.

for example the female preference for thugs is a really subhuman trait and more genetically sophisticated 'high class' women respond to it much less but being a thug might've been more advantageous in the past (thugs are playing a dangerous game, if a thug is alive he must be winning). then again females that were about to be raped would do well to submit to the strongest male 'alpha'. thugmaxxing probably evokes some sort of primal feeling in them that can no longer be authentically triggered (coming in with the boys screaming and murdering everybody and torching the village). if you can exercise some sort of authority over a foid you're probably winning

with height, sure there are disadvantages but being tall shows that you can cope with the increased food intake required and you will generally have higher fighting success than a manlet. of course height is artificially inflated in value in 2021 since nobody carries any weapons and they are mostly banned so manlets really have no way of defending themselves while carrying weapons was an integral part of being a human since a ~million years or so

anyway the real issue in 2021 is how utterly unhealthy 99.9% of the population is (and you can't adapt to goyslop for example that changes its composition every 3 months. the industrial revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race)

Smart,

I'd assume the same reason you probably prefer the one on the left to the right

View attachment 1268003
though the guy you posted would benefit greatly from additional shoulder width

bell curve

 

[thickdickdaddy27]

The physical advantages of being tall outweigh the disadvantages. Being taller increases fighting success significantly due to longer reach (limb length) and a harder to reach head. In many fighting sports, weight classes have to be used to separate unfair height discrepancies.

As far as facial features, the face reflects an individual's inbreeding index (how genetically diverse they are; heterozygosity). General health, breathing success, robust bones for combat (strong brow ridge and zygos, for example), age-related fertility, etc. are all examples of phenotypic observations from the face.

Females across many species select the best possible sperm (genetic material) for reproductive sex. Humans are no exception.

thank u for debunking this useless shit thread

 

[Deleted member 14781]

The physical advantages of being tall outweigh the disadvantages. Being taller increases fighting success significantly due to longer reach (limb length) and a harder to reach head. In many fighting sports, weight classes have to be used to separate unfair height discrepancies.

As far as facial features, the face reflects an individual's inbreeding index (how genetically diverse they are; heterozygosity). General health, breathing success, robust bones for combat (strong brow ridge and zygos, for example), age-related fertility, etc. are all examples of phenotypic observations from the face.

Females across many species select the best possible sperm (genetic material) for reproductive sex. Humans are no exception.

Women don't always select based on infraspecies competition, i would dare to say they rarely do. Just think how many women would choose Jhonny Depp over The Rock. If being tall was such a huge advantage then why the average male was 5ft5 until the industrial revolution? Females across many species don't choose the best sperm, most just submit to the winner but that's not choosing, and the ones who choose (mainly birds) choose for weird characteristics that have no real utility like the peacock tail.

 

[AsGoodAsItGets]

Doesn't make sense, for women the more the better when it's about dimorphism, they like huge 10 inches cocks, they like 6ft6 men but they don't like Ronnie Coleman type of body. How the guy looks fucked up? You said that the fact that the guy has certain features means that he can survive with them, why this doesn't apply with huge muscles mass then?
Women will always choose this
View attachment 1267975
Over this
View attachment 1267979
Despite the second being way more dimorphic.

Again bell curve in preferences. There are women attracted to huge miscles and also women attracted to non muscular twink guys. Majority of the populace will prefer a balanced physique with like the first one you posted. Looks very personal ideal to me too. Same with being too short or too tall.

 

[Deleted member 14781]

damn bro u got me there

 

[Matthias8272]

I didnt read but based on the title I'm confused how you are on here/found this if you dont believe people are compelled by their genetics, literally the foundation of humans tthemselves

 

[thickdickdaddy27]

View attachment 1268051

not really i’m actually laughing cuz ur most likely a subhuman coping it is what it is tho

 

[Deleted member 14781]

I didnt read but based on the title I'm confused how you are on here/found this if you dont believe people are compelled by their genetics, literally the foundation or humans tthemselves

If you didn't read then why should I answer to you? Over for lowattentionspancels

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Women don't always select based on infraspecies competition, i would dare to say they rarely do. Just think how many women would choose Jhonny Depp over The Rock. If being tall was such a huge advantage then why the average male was 5ft5 until the industrial revolution? Females across many species don't choose the best sperm, most just submit to the winner but that's not choosing, and the ones who choose (mainly birds) choose for weird characteristics that have no real utility like the peacock tail.

Keep in mind that women are only fertile for a few days every month. Most of a woman's life is spent prioritizing survival, not sperm.

 

[Deleted member 14781]

not really i’m actually laughing cuz ur most likely a subhuman coping it is what it is tho

Keep projecting, of course everything that is more complex than beauty = good and ugly = bad is too complex for you. Over for lowiqcels. Btw are you black?

Keep in mind that women are only fertile for a few days every month. Most of a woman's life is spent prioritizing survival, not sperm.

I don't get this.

 

[thickdickdaddy27]

Btw are you black?

pinkwell moment keeping coping it’s literally finished for u

 

[Deleted member 6273]

The physical advantages of being tall outweigh the disadvantages. Being taller increases fighting success significantly due to longer reach (limb length) and a harder to reach head. In many fighting sports, weight classes have to be used to separate unfair height discrepancies.

As far as facial features, the face reflects an individual's inbreeding index (how genetically diverse they are; heterozygosity). General health, breathing success, robust bones for combat (strong brow ridge and zygos, for example), age-related fertility, etc. are all examples of phenotypic observations from the face.

Females across many species select the best possible sperm (genetic material) for reproductive sex. Humans are no exception.

Going by this you would think combat fighters would be the most sexually desirable males (status not included), but that's clearly not the case, how would you explain evolutionary why south east asian women prefer light skin and light eyes which are dysgenic traits if they occur in tropical regions.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Keep projecting, of course everything that is more complex than beauty = good and ugly = bad is too complex for you. Over for lowiqcels. Btw are you black?


I don't get this.

I don't understand what you don't get. Look up the menstrual cycle. Eggs are only in position for fertilization (through ovulation) for a few days during the cycle.

 

[Deleted member 14781]

pinkwell moment keeping coping it’s literally finished for u

Sub 40 IQ if you think I'm pinkwell lmao everyone is convinced I'm him, Pinkwell doesn't even know what prison break is

 

[Deleted member 14781]

I don't understand what you don't get. Look up the menstrual cycle. Eggs are only in position for fertilization (through ovulation) for a few days during the cycle.

I don't get what that has to do with what I said.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Going by this you would think combat fighters would be the most sexually desirable males (status not included), but that's clearly not the case, how would you explain evolutionary why south east asian women prefer light skin and light eyes which are dysgenic traits if they occur in tropical regions.

Combat fighters could very well be sexually desirable if they have attractive facial features.

"Light skin" needs to be quantified, but in general, I would argue that lighter skin and irises provide greater contrast in terms of facial features and make it easier to assess facial expressions. But this all relative; we're comparing relatively light skin to abnormally dark skin.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

I don't get what that has to do with what I said.

I guess I didn't understand your point either.

 

[Deleted member 14781]

Combat fighters could very well be sexually desirable if they have attractive facial features.

"Light skin" needs to be quantified, but in general, I would argue that lighter skin and irises provide greater contrast in terms of facial features and make it easier to assess facial expressions. But this all relative; we're comparing relatively light skin to abnormally dark skin.

This seems like a huge stretch lmao just show her your facial expressions bro.
On a serious note, if the goal of women is to choose the best fighter then Jon Jones would be the most desired man on earth right now. As you said, they look for cues that show someone is a good fighter, however what bigger cue than someone actually being a good fighter and ko people? Btw you forgot that we are humans and for most of our history we didn't fight with bare hands, we evolved thumbs so we could use weapons.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

This seems like a huge stretch lmao just show her your facial expressions bro.
On a serious note, if the goal of women is to choose the best fighter then Jon Jones would be the most desired man on earth right now. As you said, they look for cues that show someone is a good fighter, however what bigger cue than someone actually being a good fighter and ko people? Btw you forgot that we are humans and for most of our history we didn't fight with bare hands, we evolved thumbs so we could use weapons.

Being able to assess facial expressions is a huge component of communication. And skin and iris tone are less important factors than specific facial dimensions.

Combat success is only one important factor. Being able to run, climb, carry, swim, reach objects efficiently are all genetic components. Also, hand-to-hand combat has always been relevant within the evolutionary timeline. Most of the weapons created through increased intelligence still required athleticism to operate.

You can resort to using specific examples, but I'm speaking broadly. Jon Jones is substantially more attractive to women than the average man (in terms of genes). If he were more facially attractive, he would be even more attractive.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Combat fighters could very well be sexually desirable if they have attractive facial features.

"Light skin" needs to be quantified, but in general, I would argue that lighter skin and irises provide greater contrast in terms of facial features and make it easier to assess facial expressions. But this all relative; we're comparing relatively light skin to abnormally dark skin.

It would also lead them to be more susceptible to skin cancer and overall sun damage, skin colour literally adapts to become darker around the tropics for a reason.

A typical Mma fighter is more dimorphic and has a higher fighting success look buy is smv mogged to death by near androgynous tik tok twinks.

 

[Deleted member 14781]

Being able to assess facial expressions is a huge component of communication. And skin and iris tone are less important factors than specific facial dimensions.

Combat success is only one important factor. Being able to run, climb, carry, swim, reach objects efficiently are all genetic components.

You can resort to using specific examples, but I'm speaking broadly. Jon Jones is substantially more attractive to women than the average man (in terms of genes). If he were more facially attractive, he would be even more attractive.

What you say is a contradiction. Women like the strongest man but then they don't care about following UFC or any other combat sport, they barely know who Jon Jones is despite him being one of the GOATs and he would be easily mogged by a B list actor. Why should he be more facially attractive? He already proved that he is the strongest man in the world right now, and women desire that, facial features only matter before the fight to assess who has more chances to win, after that whoever wins is the "Chad" following your reasoning.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

It would also lead them to be more susceptible to skin cancer and overall sun damage, skin colour literally adapts to become darker around the tropics for a reason.

A typical Mma fighter is more dimorphic and has a higher fighting success look buy is smv mogged to death by near androgynous tik tok twinks.

Also, darker skin tones can lead to Vitamin D deficiency in less sunny regions. There is a reason the average human skin tone is neither extremely pale nor extremely dark.

You are hyper-focusing on specific examples. Fighting success, age-related fertility, and relatively normalized, yet dimorphic features are all important genetic considerations.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

What you say is a contradiction. Women like the strongest man but then they don't care about following UFC or any other combat sport, they barely know who Jon Jones is despite him being one of the GOATs and he would be easily mogged by a B list actor. Why should he be more facially attractive? He already proved that he is the strongest man in the world right now, and women desire that, facial features only matter before the fight to assess who has more chances to win, after that whoever wins is the "Chad" following your reasoning.

You are diluting my argument. Women are sexually attracted to good genes in general. Genes that increase fighting success are one important factor to consider.

 

[Deleted member 14781]

Also, darker skin tones can lead to Vitamin D deficiency in less sunny regions. There is a reason the average human skin tone is neither extremely pale nor extremely dark.

You are hyper-focusing on specific examples. Fighting success, age-related fertility, and relatively normalized, yet dimorphic features are all important genetic considerations.

Yeah but in tropical areas those people with dark skin evolved to like dark skin right? So it doesn't make sense that JBW applies

 

[Deleted member 14781]

You are diluting my argument. Women are sexually attracted to good genes in general. Genes that increase fighting success are one important factor to consider.

Again, what's your definition of good genes?

 

[AlwaysHaveQuestions]

fisherian runaway

 

[Deleted member 14781]

fisherian runaway

I agree but elab

 

[AlwaysHaveQuestions]

I agree but elab

i dnrd but women value social security most. you can give them gigachad but if he is socially outcast they wont fuck him

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Also, darker skin tones can lead to Vitamin D deficiency in less sunny regions. There is a reason the average human skin tone is neither extremely pale nor extremely dark.

You are hyper-focusing on specific examples. Fighting success, age-related fertility, and relatively normalized, yet dimorphic features are all important genetic considerations.

What are you talking about evolutionary and natural selection is heavily environmentally dependent. It's the reason there are multiple unique phenotypes particularly adapted to their niche environment.

Yes dark skin is an disvantange at higher latitudes because of less sunshine which can lead to vitamin D deficiency but light/white skin in the same vain is a disadvantage as you approach the equator cause it's a lot more prone to sun damage, this is why Australia and New Zealand have one the highest melanoma rates.

Despite the clear fact that it's a huge disadvantage in tropical and equatorial regions it's still a desired trait.

All the features you given a heavily enviromentslly driven, but cba to go in depth since I've written a a lot already.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

i dnrd but women value social security most. you can give them gigachad but if he is socially outcast they wont fuck him

Only partially true they would do it in secret if they knew they wouldn't get caught.

 

[AlwaysHaveQuestions]

Only partially true they would do it in secret if they knew they wouldn't get caught.

cope they would be disgusted by him

 

[Deleted member 14781]

Only partially true they would do it in secret if they knew they wouldn't get caught.

Yeah classical alpha fucks beta bucks

 

[Deleted member 14781]

cope they would be disgusted by him

 

[Matthias8272]

If you didn't read then why should I answer to you? Over for lowattentionspancels

I didnt read it because your inherent point was retarded, not because I couldn't read it

 

[Deleted member 14781]

I didnt read it because your inherent point was retarded, not because I couldn't read it

How do you know my point if you don't read the thread? Jfl just read the titles theory

 

[Matthias8272]

How do you know my point if you don't read the thread? Jfl just read the titles theory

It's like if someone made a thread on how 1+2=5, and the wrote a detailed explanation of why it's that, when it just can't be. No point in reading it

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Yeah but in tropical areas those people with dark skin evolved to like dark skin right? So it doesn't make sense that JBW applies

Yes, but globalization has allowed women to select men with the best genes, globally, without being restricted to a particular geographic region.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Again, what's your definition of good genes?

Genes that increase an individual male's fitness.

 

[Deleted member 14264]

What are you talking about evolutionary and natural selection is heavily environmentally dependent. It's the reason there are multiple unique phenotypes particularly adapted to their niche environment.

Yes dark skin is an disvantange at higher latitudes because of less sunshine which can lead to vitamin D deficiency but light/white skin in the same vain is a disadvantage as you approach the equator cause it's a lot more prone to sun damage, this is why Australia and New Zealand have one the highest melanoma rates.

Despite the clear fact that it's a huge disadvantage in tropical and equatorial regions it's still a desired trait.

All the features you given a heavily enviromentslly driven, but cba to go in depth since I've written a a lot already.

Melanoma rates are high in aussies because they do not have proper ozone layer above coutrie's land, so the sun radiation damages skin. This is not the problem of ecuator.

 

[CFW432]

View attachment 1251844
Hmm I wonder (((((((why)))))

JFL the nonwhite is literally the only one that acts normal.

 

[Deleted member 14138]

I'm not sold on the theory that women select for good genes. First thing, universally good genes don't exist, good genes are good as the environment lets them be. Let's say that having dark skin is good to survive under hot climate, the same characteristic is bad in a very cold and rainy place.
Natural selection can suddenly change their criteria, women can't. Let's say a tribe of niggers has to migrate to the north because of reasons, and in northen areas they can't get as much sun as they used to, women still have the biological need to select for dark skin over paler one.
Even being tall has more disadvantages than being short (more food needed, being a bigger target, more stress on the organs and so on) but women still select for those traits. Why? Some could argue that is due to the "handicap principle" theory that states that women select men who show signs of handicaps because it shows that they are unfit but they can survive, so they must be really fit (think about the peacock tail)
This is utter nonsense, that would equate to say that being short, being obese or being a freaky muscular bodybuilder should be attractive because it shows that you can survive despite having an handicap.
I think that letting women decide the fate of humanity is a cope for those reasons.
1) women could be attracted to the winners of infraspecies competition who took them as a prize and rape them. The ones who didn't submit were killed. You can't make your species evolve if suddenly you remove infraspecies competition (this happened when society was created)
2) women could be attracted to the men they like due to result of random mutations, meaning that if out of 100 men only 10 survived they would choose the one who has the most similar characteristics to their taste

Don't come at me with the studies showing that simmetrical faces are more healthy than asimmetrical faces for example, those studies use extreme examples (on both ends) and are not realiable, it's like saying that being 6ft5 is better than being 3ft therefore the taller you are the better, which is false.

Its possible. I know good looking parents with ugly children and vise versa. Bill Gates produced pretty good looking kids. And hes pretty damn ugly, so is his wife.