AlexAP
Kraken
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2020
- Posts
- 13,896
- Reputation
- 28,979
I know what you think, XX chromosomes, that's it. But this would count for 99% of women, not 100%, so what do we do with the women with chromosomal abnormalities? Just ignore them or use a more inclusive definition?
If so, what would it be? Would it be "People whose bodies were naturally designed to produce eggs for reproduction"? That sounds good but there are intersex people who were born with bodies who don't produce eggs and with inner testicles, but with a vagina, and of course most of them were raised as and identify as female. Are they not women? Surely the men who date them see them as women if they were born with a vagina jfl.
So is it person with vaginas? Then transwomen with vaginas are women ...
Skip that. I think the hard truth that society doesn't want to accept is that the definition is:
1. A person who passes looks-wise as a woman in the eyes of society.
2. Following from 1, a person who can get sex whenever she wants (without paying).
So, forget all this biology stuff. It's all about looks. If you pass as a woman, you can get sex whenever you want, so you are effectively a woman.
This is Valentina Sampaio, a transwoman.
Obviously, 99% of straight men would have sex with her. If she's not a woman, that would men that 99% of straight men are actually gay. This "dilemma" could be solved by accepting that Valentina Sampaio is, indeed, a woman.
If so, what would it be? Would it be "People whose bodies were naturally designed to produce eggs for reproduction"? That sounds good but there are intersex people who were born with bodies who don't produce eggs and with inner testicles, but with a vagina, and of course most of them were raised as and identify as female. Are they not women? Surely the men who date them see them as women if they were born with a vagina jfl.
So is it person with vaginas? Then transwomen with vaginas are women ...
Skip that. I think the hard truth that society doesn't want to accept is that the definition is:
1. A person who passes looks-wise as a woman in the eyes of society.
2. Following from 1, a person who can get sex whenever she wants (without paying).
So, forget all this biology stuff. It's all about looks. If you pass as a woman, you can get sex whenever you want, so you are effectively a woman.
This is Valentina Sampaio, a transwoman.
Obviously, 99% of straight men would have sex with her. If she's not a woman, that would men that 99% of straight men are actually gay. This "dilemma" could be solved by accepting that Valentina Sampaio is, indeed, a woman.