M
MD_Hopeful69
Kraken
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2018
- Posts
- 3,707
- Reputation
- 2,945
Total facial height is from hairline to chin / bizygo width
whats ideal
whats ideal
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
U gotta be kidding i can show u thousands of studies that says taller face is more attractive than shorter one. I can show some that even says tall and narrow. Chico>jordan not even comprasionAccording to a study I read a while back, smaller is better. I don’t think they used ratios so much as raw face length in inches. The men in the top 25%ile most compact faces (again: overall face length, not FWHR) had the most partners and were the most sexually active. Those with the longest faces were the most likely to be incel.
Remember this correlates with FWHR and midface ratios, but is not equivalent. It’s also a law of averages. Tons of good looking guys with objectively long faces. It’s not prescriptive.
Edit: Inb4 Someone claims that second paragraph is horse face coping from me. I have a ridiculously compact face, my FWHR is well over 2.0. I’ve always wanted a longer face, honestly. But I’m learning to love what I have now that studies say what I have is better.
3 to 2, if from chin to hairline is 18cm, from zygo to zygo is 12cm, this is idealTotal facial height is from hairline to chin / bizygo width
whats ideal
1.9 to 2.063 to 2, if from chin to hairline is 18cm, from zygo to zygo is 12cm, this is ideal
2 is absolute perfect and ideal, theres no such thing as ideal range, theres one ideal1.9 to 2.06
actually seems to be 1.96 like Cavill and Bomer2 is absolute perfect and ideal, theres no such thing as ideal range, theres one ideal
brotheractually seems to be 1.96 like Cavill and Bomer