What is survival advantage of hating woman?

[messi1]

We all know human's job is to have sex and have kid
So how does hating woman help?
I'm not talking about hating woman irl
I'm talking about make some post about "woman bad" online
It's must have some evolution meaning right?

 

[accelerationist]

Youre a retarded football fan

 

[Centurion Hunter]

We all know human's job is to have sex and have kid
So how does hating woman help?
It's must have some evolution meaning right?

Because women can present a threat in todays society where they have power.
Same reason women avoided men even tho they could reproduce with them.

 

[Deleted member 159597]

Prolly cause most of them are dumb whores now.

 

[confess]

So how does hating woman help?

There's only advantages if you're better looking.

Usually it will inspire more curiosity within her friend group, her friends or enemies might want to socialize with you/or conspire against you.
You might gain respect from your peers by pretending you've above her(aura?)

Nothing changed.

They respond to the same things they always have.

The more you despise & hate them the more they love you,

There's no room for hatefucking... if wel...

there's no hate lolzlzlzlz

 

[hypernormie]

Most of human history men didn't need female approval to have sex. Sexual attraction evolved under this pretense. Hating women or seeing women as inferior more generally first and foremost secures a position of psychological dominance over them, or at least the desire for it, which translates into eventual physical dominance and therefore sexual access. Even in the modern gynocentric world where sex requires high levels of female consent, women are still wired to be attracted to men who seek dominance over them.

It doesn't provide a survival advantage so much as a reproductive advantage.

 

[hypernormie]

Also human's job isn't to "have sex or have kids"

Evolution is a random process, there is no goal or meaning behind it. Humans make a goal or meaning out of life but this can be seen as an emergent adaptation that enhances reproductive fitness not a fact of objective reality.

 

[messi1]

women or seeing women as inferior more generally first and foremost secures a position of psychological dominance over them

If hating woman don't make you dominance then all incels is dominance
Only handsome +rich make you dominance

 

[2022cel]

I don't hate women i hate sluts

 

[The Grinch]

That’s right. I love how you accepted your place. Women are superior to men and more and more men are submitting to womens dominance

 

[hypernormie]

If hating woman don't make you dominance then all incels is dominance
Only handsome +rich make you dominance

Wrong, hating women or more accurately and what you are actually referring to, the tendency to see women as inferior does increase dominance but it is not necessary for dominance. This is why you can achieve sex without seeing women as inferior. Psychological superiority over women is more like an enhancer of dominance than a requirement because you are mentioning there are more essential aspects of dominance that can lead to sexual access.

Incels are unique in that they express this facet of dominance, detachment from gynocentrism and acknowledgement of female inferiority, but lack other more essential facets of dominance that would make them sexually successful.

Just like a man may have a big dick but be short and ugly, or be tall but ugly with a small penis, not everyone has every dominant trait nor is it required to have every dominant trait to succeed. The most successful will always be those with those with the most of these traits.

 

[messi1]

Women are superior to men and more and more men are submitting to womens dominance

cuck

 

[Deleted member 92615]

That’s right. I love how you accepted your place. Women are superior to men and more and more men are submitting to womens dominance

View attachment 4286495

This some cuck shit ngl

 

[The Grinch]

cuck

Women are better than us moids. They deserve more, we deserve less. In fact, we should beg them for their mercy because we dare to exist as sub-Chads in their presence.

 

[LXR]

Not every trait is purposefully helpful to procreating. Some traits are vestiges of past environments and are no longer useful. But they still remain because enough time has not passed to evolve from them. Same way some traits are maladaptive, in the sense that they hinder procreation/survival. It takes time for evolution to happen, so every "bad"/"neutral" thing just doesn't vanish in thin air. Sometimes a neutral trait just remains, there is no evolutionary pressure on it.

 

[hypernormie]

Not every trait is purposefully helpful to procreating. Some traits are vestiges of past environments and are no longer useful. But they still remain because enough time has not passed to evolve from them. Same way some traits are maladaptive, in the sense that they hinder procreation/survival. It takes time for evolution to happen, so every "bad"/"neutral" thing just doesn't vanish in thin air. Sometimes a neutral trait just remains, there is no evolutionary pressure on it.

From the perspective of evolution no trait has any value, there are simply traits which increase the odds of a species persisting in the environment and traits which decrease it. These traits randomly fluctuate as the environment randomly fluctuates and they influence each other arbitrarily.

 

[Deleted member 180145]

it protects you from their foid antics

 

[LXR]

From the perspective of evolution no trait has any value, there are simply traits which increase the odds of a species persisting in the environment and traits which decrease it. These traits randomly fluctuate as the environment randomly fluctuates and they influence each other arbitrarily.

My point was moreso that it takes time for changes to happen

 

[hypernormie]

My point was moreso that it takes time for changes to happen

I understand, however I was specifically clarifying that point.

It's not so much that it takes time for changes to happen, changes can happen very rapidly if the environment demands it and the species can withstand it.

Time is not a guarantee of change, the factor that determines change above all is selective pressure ie: the environment. Some obvious changes that we recognize have taken a long time but long time horizons are not a requirement for change in itself.

When thinking of traits that are broadly seen as maladaptive, it is not so much that these traits are guaranteed to "catch up" to the modern context given enough time but that the environment has simply changed and the costs associated with them have changed. Many of these traits are still adaptive in the sense they guarantee reproduction and will therefore persist. hyper violent behavior such that is likely to lead to lifetime incarceration is known to be associated with above average fecundity. This phenomenon is not showing any signs of decreasing any time soon. This phenotype then is incredibly adaptive because it is very robust, with a high degree of persistence in almost every worldly environment.

 

[BadLuck7892]

I don't want to reproduce.

I want a foid who genuinely desires me both inside and outside of the bedroom (and lets my social ineptitude slide)

Since I have a hard time finding that, I hate foids

 

[messi1]

I want a foid who genuinely desires me both inside and outside of the bedroom

that's reproduce

 

[wewuzaryans134]

nigga because men arent supposed to have female approval for crack 95% of births pre society are from rape which is why women hate us now

 

[Deleted member 231621]

We all know human's job is to have sex and have kid

wrong

Evolution is a random process, there is no goal or meaning behind it. Humans make a goal or meaning out of life but this can be seen as an emergent adaptation that enhances reproductive fitness not a fact of objective reality.

it wouldn't exist if it hasn't no meaning or goal.
if life has no meaning, then this statement is also meaningless

 

[BadLuck7892]

that's reproduce

No, I don't want to reproduce

 

[messi1]

The most successful will always be those with those with the most of these traits

Psychological tactic is proved to be useless, that why red pill is dead, that why we have black pill

 

[hypernormie]

it wouldn't exist if it hasn't no meaning or goal.
if life has no meaning, then this statement is also meaningless

this is nonsensical

 

[Deleted member 231621]

this is nonsensical

propaganda

 

[got.daim]

We all know human's job is to have sex and have kid
So how does hating woman help?
I'm not talking about hating woman irl
I'm talking about make some post about "woman bad" online
It's must have some evolution meaning right?

 

[hypernormie]

Psychological tactic is proved to be useless, that why red pill is dead, that why we have black pill

Psychological understanding or basically social skills are not useless. They are less useful then they've been in historically advertised as by the PUA community compared to other aspects of sexual attraction but they are far from useless or non impactful on your results.

 

[hypernormie]

propaganda

You aren't saying anything. You are asserting that things must mean something because of what? That they exist?

 

[Deleted member 231621]

You aren't saying anything. You are asserting that things must mean something because of what? That they exist?

everything that exists have "meaning" predicate by definition

 

[hypernormie]

everything that exists have "meaning" predicate by definition

No

 

[Deleted member 231621]

No

explain

 

[hypernormie]

explain

You would need to explain. You are the one asserting that mere existence implies meaning.

 

[Deleted member 231621]

You would need to explain. You are the one asserting that mere existence implies meaning.

if it has no meaning then it would not exist. Something cannot exist without a meaning, because it doesn't mean something. Being literally means "be something", life exists, so it is being, and therefore it has a meaning. If something has no meaning, then it doesn't exist

 

[hypernormie]

if it has no meaning then it would not exist. Something cannot exist without a meaning, because it doesn't mean something. Being literally means "be something", life exists, so it is being, and therefore it has a meaning. If something has no meaning, then it doesn't exist

You're making a weird logical leap from being to meaning that doesn't exist outside of your own mind

Also you are arguing from semantics which are definitions in English which would be hardly expected to map onto total reality

The definition of being could literally be "has a purpose" that wouldn't make it true that actual objective reality has a purpose

 

[Deleted member 231621]

You're making a weird logical leap from being to meaning that doesn't exist outside of your own mind

Also you are arguing from semantics which are definitions in English which would be hardly expected to map onto total reality

The definition of being could literally be "has a purpose" that wouldn't make it true that actual objective reality has a purpose

my cutie the idea that something can exist outside of your own mind also exists only in your own mind by YOUR OWN LOGIC.
btw how is that weird logical leap from being to meaning if "there's something that has no meaning" it just cannot exist BECAUSE IT FUCKIGN has literally NO meaning, it is 0, null, nothing, non-existence

 

[Primalsplit]

We all know human's job is to have sex and have kid
So how does hating woman help?
I'm not talking about hating woman irl
I'm talking about make some post about "woman bad" online
It's must have some evolution meaning right?

Because foids get off on cruel behaviour. They love it.

 

[messi1]

Because foids get off on cruel behaviour. They love it.

Then most of this forum will get laid
Most user here hate woman

 

[Primalsplit]

Then most of this forum will get laid
Most user here hate woman

I see that logic isn't your strong suit. Farewell.

 

[hypernormie]

my cutie the idea that something can exist outside of your own mind also exists only in your own mind by YOUR OWN LOGIC.
btw how is that weird logical leap from being to meaning if "there's something that has no meaning" it just cannot exist BECAUSE IT FUCKIGN has literally NO meaning, it is 0, null, nothing, non-existence

No, you are just conflating existence with meaning.

Meaning implies intention, this obviously falls apart when applied to the nature of existence itself. Existence could have intention or it could not, however it is far from settled that it has intention by definition as would be implied by claiming it has a meaning. The definition of meaning or the definition of existence has a meaning but this says nothing about the fundamental properties of these things, only their properties or qualities as they relate to the goal of human communication. Obviously the constraints of human communication or cognition don't necessarily equate to objective realities.

Either you just have a difficult time understanding how words work or you just have a very loose relationship with definitions.

You are basically saying that my subjective perspective on a word implies an ontological fact of existence, or you are not saying this and just engaging hyper subjective semantic wordplay. That type of relationship to linguistics is typically seen in trannies. It's weird and unproductive. Just because you want a word to mean something doesn't mean it actually means that thing. Maybe if you lay off the estrogen for awhile some order will be restored in your cognition.

 

[Deleted member 231621]

No, you are just conflating existence with meaning.

Meaning implies intention, this obviously falls apart when applied to the nature of existence itself. Existence could have intention or it could not, however it is far from settled that it has intention by definition as would be implied by claiming it has a meaning. The definition of meaning or the definition of existence has a meaning but this says nothing about the fundamental properties of these things, only their properties or qualities as they relate to the goal of human communication. Obviously the constraints of human communication or cognition don't necessarily equate to objective realities.

Either you just have a difficult time understanding how words work or you just have a very loose relationship with definitions.

You are basically saying that my subjective perspective on a word implies an ontological fact of existence, or you are not saying this and just engaging hyper subjective semantic wordplay. That type of relationship to linguistics is typically seen in trannies. It's weird and unproductive. Just because you want a word to mean something doesn't mean it actually means that thing. Maybe if you lay off the estrogen for awhile some order will be restored in your cognition.

retarded bunch of strawmans and ad hominems

 

[hypernormie]

retarded bunch of strawmans and ad hominems

Well yeah because you can't argue with a tranny. People like you live in a world of infinite subjectivity. There's no objective basis for a conversation because you discard the notion of objectivity altogether.

 

[Hernan]

Also human's job isn't to "have sex or have kids"

Evolution is a random process, there is no goal or meaning behind it. Humans make a goal or meaning out of life but this can be seen as an emergent adaptation that enhances reproductive fitness not a fact of objective reality.

yooo you're back!

 

[hypernormie]

yooo you're back!

Did I go somewhere?

 

[Deleted member 231621]

Well yeah because you can't argue with a tranny. People like you live in a world of infinite subjectivity. There's no objective basis for a conversation because you discard the notion of objectivity altogether.

infinite subjectivity is literally your claim, you said "muh muh it is in your head!!" when you said it "You're making a weird logical leap from being to meaning that doesn't exist outside of your own mind"
just fucking lol at your retarded solipsist logic.

 

[hypernormie]

infinite subjectivity is literally your claim, you said "muh muh it is in your head!!" when you said it "You're making a weird logical leap from being to meaning that doesn't exist outside of your own mind"
just fucking lol at your retarded solipsist logic.

No, I'm claiming that you are doing that.

Please learn to read.

 

[Deleted member 231621]

No, I'm claiming that you are doing that.

Please learn to read.

>meaning doesn't exist outside of your mind
>i'm not a solipsist trust me bhai

 

[Hernan]

Did I go somewhere?

idk, i just never saw your posts again.

 

[hypernormie]

>meaning doesn't exist outside of your mind
>i'm not a solipsist trust me bhai

Yes you as an aspect of reality experience meaning, so in a way, reality can experience meaning through the vector of you or sufficiently intelligent lifeforms, however this isn't a stable property of even human experience. It is a transient local phenomenon. So I guess in some sense you can say reality is meaningful in some sense but this would not then translate to meaning being an ultimate property of the thing itself, at best you can say meaning is a property that reality can exhibit or express.

In the same way I can experience happiness, does it then make sense to say that I am fundamentally happy or that happiness is my fundamental nature? That would be nonsensical.