what is the ideal facial convexity angle and is it a good indicator of forward growth / recession?

[Giga Mogger]

title.

 

[iam good boy]

title.

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

whatever looks good looks good

 

[Magnum Opus]

145 including nose, 178 without

 

[Giga Mogger]

145 including nose, 178 without

https://looksmax.org/threads/total-facial-convexity-angle.319189/ what about the measurements on this thread here?

 

[Magnum Opus]

https://looksmax.org/threads/total-facial-convexity-angle.319189/ what about the measurements on this thread here?

Classic fallacy of analyzing a feature on gl people and assuming its one of the reasons that they're attractive, even though you can clearly see by just using your eyes that Brad Pitt f.e. is recessed
Also the convexity angle itself doesnt picture the whole story, f.e. O'Pry looks way less downgrown than Pitt due to his mandible length and the fact his lower lip doesnt hang down, as it's the case with Pitt

 

[Deleted member 16280]

Classic fallacy of analyzing a feature on gl people and assuming its one of the reasons that they're attractive, even though you can clearly see by just using your eyes that Brad Pitt f.e. is recessed
Also the convexity angle itself doesnt picture the whole story, f.e. O'Pry looks way less downgrown than Pitt due to his mandible length and the fact his lower lip doesnt hang down, as it's the case with Pitt

Also all those pics referenced are taken at different angles so the measurements taken are completely useless JFL