What is the most ideal fwhr?

TsarTsar444

TsarTsar444

Asexual peaceful balkan monk
Joined
May 5, 2019
Posts
41,699
Reputation
106,108
And how much is your fwhr
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
square face, like my avi
 
  • +1
Reactions: IndianJock
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
My friends have told me i have a square face, and i measured my fwhr, it's around 2.03
yea thats around ideal as far as i know

but it doesnt mean much if your face isnt good
 
  • JFL
Reactions: IndianJock
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
You aren't even human if you are sub 2 FWHR
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: zeshama, Chadelite, Vidyacoper and 2 others
Distance from zygo to zygo divided with distance between lower eyebrow border and upper lip

I still can't believe that Hamudi got shoad.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: AutisticBeaner and TsarTsar444
Distance from zygo to zygo divided with distance between lower eyebrow border and upper lip
And whats a good number? and what does the number say
 
2.00
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444
And whats a good number? and what does the number say
20191120 234824

You measure it on paint like this, ideal is from 1.80 to 2.00, average male has around 1.75-1.80
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
fwhr probably doesnt even do anything significant directly for attractiveness. it certainly makes your face look more robust which then leads to a higher intimidation factor and possibly makes you more attractive to certain women
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9670 and Deleted member 2426
3.5

Urang utangmax asap
 
Over if you’re not high prenatal T
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
Horrible pic for that, i need one with back camera in broad daylight from 2m away and you looking straight into it
fuck ok ill see if i have one
 
Where? On what part
I think it doesn't make much of a difference but aren't you supposed to measure the outermost part of the zygos at the front? Your frame in paint is set on the outermost part of the back of the zygos. Do you see what I mean? I believe it should be slightly narrower.
 
I think it doesn't make much of a difference but aren't you supposed to measure the outermost part of the zygos at the front? Your frame in paint is set on the outermost part of the back of the zygos. Do you see what I mean? I believe it should be slightly narrower.
It's measured on the widest part of the face, aka the processus zygomaticum, because well...thats the widest part of the face
Screenshot 20191222 230705 Drive

The widest part of the face is the temporal process of the zygomatic bones, and the facial height is from the upper orbital to the lower border of the maxila
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: AscendingHero and Deleted member 13787
Tsartsars me
 
It's measured on the widest part of the face, aka the processus zygomaticum, because well...thats the widest part of the face
View attachment 201276
The widest part of the face is the temporal process of the zygomatic bones, and the facial height is from the upper orbital to the lower border of the maxila
Even then, you're not quite measuring it at that point. You're measuring the outline of that user's skull.
But whatever way you do it, it doesn't really matter as long as the ones you're comparing yourself to have been measured the same way for highest accuracy.
 
Even then, you're not quite measuring it at that point. You're measuring the outline of that user's skull.
But whatever way you do it, it doesn't really matter as long as the ones you're comparing yourself to have been measured the same way for highest accuracy.
Yeah in this measurement i got around 2.04 which is insane, still even if i narrow it down a bit i get close to 2.00
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
2.0 for tall dark and handsome, dark triad low inhibition slayer
1.8-1.85 for model or actor
1.75-1.8 for high trust high class high status professional
 
2.0 for tall dark and handsome, dark triad low inhibition slayer
1.8-1.85 for model or actor
1.75-1.8 for high trust high class high status professional
A real 2.00 is very rare actually, most slayers are in the 1.9 to 2.00 category
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787 and Reggina Calcio
Ideal is 1.9-2.0
Everything above 1.8 is good
Sub 1.8 is bad
Mine is 1.86-1.91

If your FWHR is sub 1.8 then it's time to ROPE.
 
1.90-2.00

mine is 2.00
 
Ideal is 1.9-2.0
Everything above 1.8 is good
Sub 1.8 is bad
Mine is 1.86-1.91

If your FWHR is sub 1.8 then it's time to ROPE.
Not true tbh, 1.7 to 1.8 is not the bad, 1.8 to 2.0 is just ideal. Mine is somewhere between 1.90 and 2.03
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
Not true tbh, 1.7 to 1.8 is not the bad, 1.8 to 2.0 is just ideal. Mine is somewhere between 1.90 and 2.03
1.7-1.8 is still bad. It is what it is boyo.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQcel
1.82 is the most ideal fwhr
 
2.0-2.1 my cheekbones are absurdly wide
 
Can someone measure my fwhr
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
6
Views
163
Saint Casanova
Saint Casanova
Joaquin
Replies
86
Views
1K
Prettyboyzazaturner
Prettyboyzazaturner
grungymallard97
Replies
1
Views
26
grungymallard97
grungymallard97
NordicLeonhard
Replies
23
Views
252
Lookologist003
Lookologist003
shadow_bright
Over Newcell
Replies
13
Views
169
jesuischriste
jesuischriste

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top