.*my*.
Kess mah ess
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2020
- Posts
- 22,193
- Reputation
- 22,300
Now I know that the psl/blackpill community is about as delusional as the redpill/pua community, but the amount of truth is consistently 60-80% in both communities.
What I mean by that is that PUA/redpill often present pretty valid proof that an average looking guy or an “old” guy can get girls way above his league if he has the character, personality, finances and whatever else besides looks.
Where they’re delusional is that they think it’s real for a fat normie to compete with a 6’3 ripped chad. (And it may be, in exceptional circumstances, like if the girl is 25 and the chad is like 18 and broke she’s no way in hell going to be with him, she’s probably going to pick the fat normie who’s 5 years older than her and has all of the other things. Like me on tinder I rarely get matches with girls older than me, because youth is obviously a turn off as a guy).
Where the PSL/Blackpill community is wrong is that you think that a guy can’t be dating a girl who’s better looking than him without her cheating on him or having ulterior motives, which I agree often happens, but not always. I know many cases irl where the woman is beautiful and the guy is average/below average and he starts having financial problems for a while but she doesn’t leave him and everything turns out alright for them eventually.
So my question is for those of you who swallowed both pills and see that the truth is somewhere in the middle, what is the most real difference in looks with 2 things in mind 1. Best chance that the guy won’t get dumped and 2. The girl is as attractive as possible.
So let’s say a guy is 5 PSL, is it reasonable that he should get with a girl who’s also a 5 PSL? What are the chances of getting dumped if he’s redpilled and takes charge in the relationship? Is it wiser to go for girls who are 4.5 PSL? Or the other way around, go for girls who are 5.5 PSL? What are your thoughts?
What I mean by that is that PUA/redpill often present pretty valid proof that an average looking guy or an “old” guy can get girls way above his league if he has the character, personality, finances and whatever else besides looks.
Where they’re delusional is that they think it’s real for a fat normie to compete with a 6’3 ripped chad. (And it may be, in exceptional circumstances, like if the girl is 25 and the chad is like 18 and broke she’s no way in hell going to be with him, she’s probably going to pick the fat normie who’s 5 years older than her and has all of the other things. Like me on tinder I rarely get matches with girls older than me, because youth is obviously a turn off as a guy).
Where the PSL/Blackpill community is wrong is that you think that a guy can’t be dating a girl who’s better looking than him without her cheating on him or having ulterior motives, which I agree often happens, but not always. I know many cases irl where the woman is beautiful and the guy is average/below average and he starts having financial problems for a while but she doesn’t leave him and everything turns out alright for them eventually.
So my question is for those of you who swallowed both pills and see that the truth is somewhere in the middle, what is the most real difference in looks with 2 things in mind 1. Best chance that the guy won’t get dumped and 2. The girl is as attractive as possible.
So let’s say a guy is 5 PSL, is it reasonable that he should get with a girl who’s also a 5 PSL? What are the chances of getting dumped if he’s redpilled and takes charge in the relationship? Is it wiser to go for girls who are 4.5 PSL? Or the other way around, go for girls who are 5.5 PSL? What are your thoughts?