What is truly the ideal male height AESTHETICALLY — 6’5-6’6 or 6’7-6’8?

[ThatBoneStructure]

Assuming that two men each height range won the genetic lottery and consequently can build muscle easily, going strictly off of aesthetics/beauty, which height is supreme?

I don’t wanna read shit about day-to-day practicality or being able to NBAmaxx — this is purely about physical attractiveness/beauty.

I will be tagging and asking you to explain your vote if you haven’t already.

 

[superpsycho]

u can never be too tall

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

u can never be too tall

Yes you can

 

[superpsycho]

Yes you can

no u cant

heightpill is becoming increasingly more brutal everyday

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

no u cant

heightpill is becoming increasingly more brutal everyday

You can

Heightpill is becoming more brutal, but not in the way that you seem to think. It’s not that height preferences are getting taller, it’s that more people are developing said preferences. It’s more normal than ever to hear 6’5 being described as ideal, but 6’7+ will never be the ideal. Don’t let some fetishist cunts on TikTok rot your brain

 

[superpsycho]

You can

Heightpill is becoming more brutal, but not in the way that you seem to think. It’s not that height preferences are getting taller, it’s that more people are developing said preferences. It’s more normal than ever to hear 6’5 being described as ideal, but 6’7+ will never be the ideal. Don’t let some fetishist cunts on TikTok rot your brain

i just hope most tallcels learn to not ruin their genes by going for a 5 ft tall woman tbh.

also i dont use tiktok

 

[Deleted member 124498]

They're all too tall.

 

[kasrkin]

6'3

 

[IHATEINDIANS]

u can never be too tall

you can, its been proven by dating app studies. "6'6" is the peak (niggas always fraud on dating apps probably closer to 6'5-6'4) and appeal drops dramatically after that

 

[ItsOver999]

rrdacted

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

@Foreverbrad @recai iskender @LTN88

Please explain/rationalise your vote.

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

6'3

Not one of the options boyo

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

@Mosh Explain vote?

 

[Saint Casanova]

6’3/4 is best

 

[Deleted member 99987]

Imo, 6’2.

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

6’3/4 is best

6’3-6’4 is a close second to the ideal

 

[Deleted member 125888]

180 to 187 cm is ideal.

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

Imo, 6’2.

Respectable height, but far too short to be the aesthetic ideal

Again, I’m talking about which height looks the best, not which one is most accommodated by society or which one enables “NBAmaxxing”

This hypothesis also assumes that both the 6’5-6’6 and 6’7-6’8 figures have optimal muscle-building genetics, so I don’t wanna read shit about “lanklets” either

 

[Deleted member 99987]

Respectable height, but far too short to be the aesthetic ideal (again, I’m talking about which height looks the best, not which one is most accommodated by society or which one enables “NBAmaxxing”

Yes, i’m talking about aesthetics. 6’2 is the most aesthetic imo. Anything taller is too tall.

 

[subltn]

might as well be 6'8 since you're getting crazy backpain anyway. At least you'll have something unmoggable

 

[Saint Casanova]

Respectable height, but far too short to be the aesthetic ideal (again, I’m talking about which height looks the best, not which one is most accommodated by society or which one enables “NBAmaxxing”

6’2 is the best height that balances good proportions, frame, and face ( Not overly long mid face)

Once you get passed, 6’4/5, you’ll typically be very lanky. There are exceptions though.

Not sure if that’s what you mean by most aesthetic height though

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

180 to 187 cm is ideal.

Aesthetically? No way

A 6’6 Chad or Tyrone with great muscle-building genetics is better to look at than one under 6’2

 

[SkiSquadJPG]

None, my height 192cm (6 oil barells and 3 bigmacs) is the most superb height OAT and will never be contested.

 

[Deleted member 125888]

Aesthetically? No way

A 6’6 Chad or Tyrone with great muscle-building genetics is better to look at than one under 6’2

Most male models are 180 to 187 cm.

 

[Troglodyte452]

Europe: 185 - 193 (if you have the face for 193)
Rest of the world: 182 - 190

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

might as well be 6'8 since you're getting crazy backpain anyway. At least you'll have something unmoggable

6’8 is moggable though, it’s just slightly more freakish

 

[Saint Casanova]

Aesthetically? No way

A 6’6 Chad or Tyrone with great muscle-building genetics is better to look at than one under 6’2

That’s genuinely 1/1 million. Doubt you’ll see someone like that ever.

 

[subltn]

6’8 is moggable though, it’s just slightly more freakish

unless you go to a basketball game, you're never getting mogged. 6'8 is basically 100th percentile

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

That’s genuinely 1/1 million. Doubt you’ll see someone like that ever.

It’s not 1 in a million, it’s just much rarer

Look at people like Joe Manganiello and Derek Theler — both 6’5–6’6, neither are skinny/lanklets:

And they’re not even pro athletes or anything

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

unless you go to a basketball game, you're never getting mogged. 6'8 is basically 100th percentile

So you agree, it’s moggable lol

 

[subltn]

So you agree, it’s moggable lol

yeah moggable in the sense that it will happen if you surround yourself with taller people. In day to day life you'll never meet anyone taller than you. You're basically the 6'8 guy everyone sees once in their life.

 

[Saint Casanova]

It’s not 1 in a million, it’s just much rarer

Look at people like Joe Manganiello and Derek Theler — both 6’5–6’6, neither are skinny/lanklets:

And they’re not even pro athletes or anything

They are close to that number. Imagine how many people you see in your lifetime. I doubt you’ll see someone with such a full package.

At most, you might see a 6’4 chad slayer once or twice. Maybe at some very rich university.

You can do the calculations. How rare a chad face is times by how rare at 6’6 guy is times by someone who has an elite frame and physique. You’ll get close to my number of 1/1million.

 

[Richard Spencer]

6'0~6'2

 

[anthony111553]

They are close to that number. Imagine how many people you see in your lifetime. I doubt you’ll see someone with such a full package.

At most, you might see a 6’4 chad slayer once or twice. Maybe at some very rich university.

You can do the calculations. How rare a chad face is times by how rare at 6’6 guy is times by someone who has an elite frame and physique. You’ll get close to my number of 1/1million.

if i saw Joe Manganiello irl im killing myself

 

[Saint Casanova]

if i saw Joe Manganiello irl im killing myself

Made an already tall Chris Hemsworth look small

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

yeah moggable in the sense that it will happen if you surround yourself with taller people. In day to day life you'll never meet anyone taller than you. You're basically the 6'8 guy everyone sees once in their life.

Not if you live in a major city lol

The problem with this height-mogging shit is that it stops people from realising that there’s such thing as diminishing returns

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

6'0~6'2

Far too short to be the perfect male height

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

They are close to that number. Imagine how many people you see in your lifetime. I doubt you’ll see someone with such a full package.

At most, you might see a 6’4 chad slayer once or twice. Maybe at some very rich university.

You can do the calculations. How rare a chad face is times by how rare at 6’6 guy is times by someone who has an elite frame and physique. You’ll get close to my number of 1/1million.

But that’s the point of the thread dude — to imagine a scenario where both the 6’5-6’6 guy and the 6’7-6’8 guy have perfect body proportions, and then decide on which height is more aesthetically pleasing after the fact. It’s a hypothesis

 

[Paroxysm]

No such thing as too tall

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

No such thing as too tall

There is and it’s aggressively retarded to think otherwise jfl

 

[gonzalezcheis]

6’3”-6’5” mogs. this is the point where you’re very tall and tower over average folk but are still within the realms of normal society.

the chance of u looking aesthetic at 6’6 and up are slim to none and that putting it very lightly

 

[Deleted member 119732]

@Foreverbrad @recai iskender @LTN88

Please explain/rationalise your vote.

The more the better until you start looking like a twig, tall women are way hotter as well

 

[Deleted member 119732]

6'11 heightmogs 6'5

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

6'11 heightmogs 6'5

Heightmogs =/= looks better

More people need to understand that

 

[ThatBoneStructure]

6’3”-6’5” mogs. this is the point where you’re very tall and tower over average folk but are still within the realms of normal society.

the chance of u looking aesthetic at 6’6 and up are slim to none and that putting it very lightly

Tbf in the hypothesis presented in OP, both the 6’6 and 6’8 guy have ideal, one-in-a-million proportions

 

[Joaquin]

Literally more like 1 in 100 million

They are close to that number. Imagine how many people you see in your lifetime. I doubt you’ll see someone with such a full package.

At most, you might see a 6’4 chad slayer once or twice. Maybe at some very rich university.

You can do the calculations. How rare a chad face is times by how rare at 6’6 guy is times by someone who has an elite frame and physique. You’ll get close to my number of 1/1million.

 

[Joaquin]

6.3 is peak male height. After that chances are youll look like Slenderman lol

 

[britshcel]

6 ft 6 to 6 ft 9 is ideal. Below 6 ft 4 is manlet and 6 ft 4 is pushing it.

 

[Deleted member 119732]

Heightmogs =/= looks better

More people need to understand that

any girl would choose 6'11 over probably any other height, 7 foot starts sounding weird

 

[160cmcurry]