
jayker
Iron
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2025
- Posts
- 38
- Reputation
- 21
ya bro ur coping, life starts at 6'6 and thats pushing itYes, i’m talking about aesthetics. 6’2 is the most aesthetic imo. Anything taller is too tall.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
ya bro ur coping, life starts at 6'6 and thats pushing itYes, i’m talking about aesthetics. 6’2 is the most aesthetic imo. Anything taller is too tall.
Bullshit. Life peaks at 6’6.ya bro ur coping, life starts at 6'6 and thats pushing it
Son, you don’t live in the real world lol. 6’11 is freak-show territory with niche appeal. 6’6 is the sweet spot before the diminishing returns.any girl would choose 6'11 over probably any other height, 7 foot starts sounding weird
In the OP hypothesis, both the 6ft6 and 6ft8 person have perfect proportions aren’t hindered by the typical inconveniences of extreme height. So the slenderman fear-mongering is pointless6.3 is peak male height. After that chances are youll look like Slenderman lol
I wouldn’t mind the trolling if it were creative smh6 ft 6 to 6 ft 9 is ideal. Below 6 ft 4 is manlet and 6 ft 4 is pushing it.
That’s not true broBullshit. Life peaks at 6’6.
Yes it is lmaoThat’s not true bro![]()
How tall are youYes it is lmao
6’4How tall are you
Exactly
That proves nothing lmaoExactly
Do you get approached by girlsThat proves nothing lmao
YesDo you get approached by girls
Objectively no
Even beautifully-proportioned, it just looks aesthetically off past a certain pointThere is no limit to height as long as you have good proportions which 99.999% of ultra tall people do not have.
The long legs, peanut skull, lanky look is what makes it unattractive when you get too tall.
But if they truly had good proportions (that of a regular average person), you wouldn’t be able to tell something looked off unless they were standing next to something comparatively smaller than them.Even beautifully-proportioned, it just looks aesthetically off past a certain point
Exactly.But if they truly had good proportions (that of a regular average person), you wouldn’t be able to tell something looked off unless they were standing next to something comparatively smaller than them.
uhuh sure
FaceAssuming that two men each height range won the genetic lottery and consequently can build muscle easily, going strictly off of aesthetics/beauty, which height is supreme?
I don’t wanna read shit about day-to-day practicality or being able to NBAmaxx — this is purely about physical attractiveness/beauty.
I will be tagging and asking you to explain your vote if you haven’t already.
Nigga is much rather be able to not hit my head on doors and fit comfortably in cars and airplanes you can definitely be too tallno u cant
heightpill is becoming increasingly more brutal everyday
let me rephrase itNigga is much rather be able to not hit my head on doors and fit comfortably in cars and airplanes you can definitely be too tall
the taller the better.@Foreverbrad @Paroxysm @hamo008 @NoReedemingFeature @PsychoH @Mosh12 @greycelzoomer @superpsycho @160cmcurry @silently_said @recai iskender @Miami @Banchi
If you haven’t already, explain exactly why 6’7/6’8 is superior to 6’5/6’6. No one votes without getting interrogated.
I keep reading this dumb shit in the replies and it’s making me rage jflthe taller the better.
6’6 morning height is the ideal height. 6’3.5 is decent but far from ideal6'3.5" barefoot is the ideal height. It doesn't look short next to 6'6" but next to normies 6'0" and under, it is very tall.
Not to women. That height is subhuman tier. 6'3" is the last acceptable non freak tier height. And even then, they don't prefer it, when it comes to European women, that is.6’6 morning height is the ideal height. 6’3.5 is decent but far from ideal
5'5 is supremeAssuming that two men each height range won the genetic lottery and consequently can build muscle easily, going strictly off of aesthetics/beauty, which height is supreme?
I don’t wanna read shit about day-to-day practicality or being able to NBAmaxx — this is purely about physical attractiveness/beauty.
I will be tagging and asking you to explain your vote if you haven’t already.
That’s cool and all, but realistically who the fuck is 6’7?@Foreverbrad @Paroxysm @hamo008 @NoReedemingFeature @PsychoH @Mosh12 @greycelzoomer @superpsycho @160cmcurry @silently_said @recai iskender @Miami @Banchi
If you haven’t already, explain exactly why 6’7/6’8 is superior to 6’5/6’6. No one votes without getting interrogated.
I tend to refer to 6’3-6’4 as the last point before perfection. The “doorstep of ideal”, if you will6’3 to 6’5 is ideal imo
I feel like freak/ogre tier starts at around 6’8. 6’6 is the last truly beautiful height with no circus freak allegationsNot to women. That height is subhuman tier. 6'3" is the last acceptable non freak tier height. And even then, they don't prefer it, when it comes to European women, that is.
If you have a big skull and upper body then 6'8 is ideal proportion@Foreverbrad @Paroxysm @hamo008 @NoReedemingFeature @PsychoH @Mosh12 @greycelzoomer @superpsycho @160cmcurry @silently_said @recai iskender @Miami @Banchi
If you haven’t already, explain exactly why 6’7/6’8 is superior to 6’5/6’6. No one votes without getting interrogated.
I just can’t see 6’8 as better than 6’6 even with ideal proportions on bothIf you have a big skull and upper body then 6'8 is ideal proportion
You don’t believe that5'11-6'1 mogs
its the truth.I keep reading this dumb shit in the replies
idc.and it’s making me rage jfl
It’s not the truth jfl. “The tall the better” has a very obvious, concrete limit and anyone who had ever actually visually observed humans (i.e not an autist shut-in) would know that.its the truth.
ah yes, anyone who has observed the abundant sample size of 6'8+ people and closely followed their lives and interpersonal relationships up close in real life. you sound goofy as hell while trying to seem smart dude. there is no such thing as too tall, there may be diminishing returns from say 6'6 to 7 feet but 7 feet chad still beats 6'6 chad. read some female literotica and redpill yourself on just how limitless the female supernormal stimulus is. or just open tiktok and look at the ENORMOUS female engagement that gigatall chads / dudes being filmed in public generates.It’s not the truth jfl. “The tall the better” has a very obvious, concrete limit and anyone who had ever actually visually observed humans (i.e not an autist shut-in) would know that.
The bolded statements being next to each other is what makes this hilarious. Dude, go out in to the world and interact with the opposite sex; ask them which height is more appealing out of Victor Wembanyama’s or Jacob Elordi’s, then report back. Better yet, just watch the TikToks that you seem to swear by; overwhelmingly, the most desired male height mentioned by foids on TikTok is 6’5 (not even my opinion btw).ah yes, anyone who has observed the abundant sample size of 6'8+ people and closely followed their lives and interpersonal relationships up close in real life. you sound goofy as hell while trying to seem smart dude. there is no such thing as too tall, there may be diminishing returns from say 6'6 to 7 feet but 7 feet chad still beats 6'6 chad. read some female literotica and redpill yourself on just how limitless the female supernormal stimulus is. or just open tiktok and look at the ENORMOUS female engagement that gigatall chads / dudes being filmed in public generates.