What is truly the ideal male height AESTHETICALLY — 6’5-6’6 or 6’7-6’8?

Everything else being equal, which height simply LOOKS the best?


  • Total voters
    117
  • +1
Reactions: seanonigger
  • +1
Reactions: seanonigger
or the more likely fact, you just don't see legit tall people which is very rare
I’ve lived in major cities my whole life (including fucking Amsterdam lmao). My perspective isn’t the result of not seeing very tall people on a regular basis
 
I’ve lived in major cities my whole life (including fucking Amsterdam lmao). My perspective isn’t the result of not seeing very tall people on a regular basis
keep coping bud
 
  • +1
Reactions: seanonigger
Aesthetically 6’6 and 6’7 is retarted and looks lanklet or ogre. Ideal height is 6’2.5-6,3 that’s main character height. You can still put on muscle and not look lanklet. You are taller than 90% of other guys. If I ever see a woman with a 6’7 lanklet I just laugh and smile it looks absolutely comical to see a 5’5 roastie walk with her elongated spaghetti noodle.
 
As long as your frame matches your height you can be taller and look better so yeah the first option is cope imo
 
5'9" is the ideal height
 
As long as your frame matches your height you can be taller and look better so yeah the first option is cope imo
Even with ideal proportions, there’s a limit to height looking good imo. 6’5-6’6 remains ideal. 6’3-6’4 is also more ideal than 6’7-6’8.
 

Similar threads

Nodesbitch
Replies
30
Views
3K
aabb123
aabb123
134applesauce456
2 3
Replies
110
Views
14K
roadtochang123
roadtochang123
T
Replies
53
Views
4K
ThatBoneStructure
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top