greycel
It's hard to be Good in a World of Evil 🧑🏻🌾
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2023
- Posts
- 14,889
- Reputation
- 34,901
There's too many shit raters.
This will be a rating for PSL
Not Appeal
Not Genes (completely dependent on race)
Rating these specific pictures
Not the person
This PSL Rating is to measure aesthetics. I use the following rarities:
HTB entry: top 15%, 1/6
Stacylite entry: top 1%, 1/100
Stacy entry: top 0.05%, 1/2000
To understand the rarity:
HTB is on average most aesthetic in a small group of friends, Stacylite is top 1-2 most aesthetic girls in your year group, Stacy is most aesthetic in 2 schools of just women
Unlike other threads where somebody will show 1 picture and rate the individual entirely on it, I'm going to be rating the pictures.
It's up to
to form the right informed judgement, by taking into account multiple pictures from different angles, in different scenarios, and applying appropriate weightagesAnyways, let's begin..
LTB
Low:
Unknown, right girl
Mid:
Unknown, looks like a girl @SecularIslamist would goon over
High:
Sorry @Looks over NT
MTB
Low:
From @Daddy's Home thread
Mid:
StrawberryTabby
High:
Sophie Rain
HTB
Low:
Melissa Fuentes
Mid:
Unknown
High:
Jessica Alba
Stacylite
Low:
Dove Cameron
Mid:
Unknown
High:
Narcy Tiktokker, left girl
Stacy
Low:
Loli Bahia
Mid:
Taylor Hill
High:
Hyper-Fogger, name?
After this is PSL Icon and then Terrastacy tier.
I'll cover these in another thread.
I must admit, I have told you all 1 lie though.
One of these unknown girls I DO know. It was the Mid HTB:
Her name is Erika Saraceni. This is another pic of her:
I have noticed that variance in looks is higher with girls and guys who are higher PSL (exponentially rarer = harder to maintain) + rely on features/harmony over bones:
Last edited:
