Robi.x_
Iron
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2025
- Posts
- 33
- Reputation
- 9
Cuz I was rated mtn-htn before my ascension and Im rated around the same after a year so idk how rare is rn mtn-htn compared to year ago
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
iqlet15th percentile in my opinion
2-3% is too high you prob using a outdated statistic cuz the beauty standart changed drastically after looksmaxxing got popular2-3%, though its hard to picture that 1 in 50-33 people are HTN.
it almost didnt btw jfl2-3% is too high you prob using a outdated statistic cuz the beauty standart changed drastically after looksmaxxing got popular
"Outdated statistic" there's no statistic nor study for rarity of "HTN" according to "PSL standards" nigger2-3% is too high you prob using a outdated statistic cuz the beauty standart changed drastically after looksmaxxing got popular
Normie doesn't mean shitNobody knows what HTN is meant to be anymore.
It’s literally a high tier NORMIE
An attractive normie- not a chad who gets his life handed to him because of his looks
Someone who would be the best looking in a college classroom and will get a halo due to his looks
JFL at people saying htn is top 1%
htn is pretty normal it depends on where u liveCuz I was rated mtn-htn before my ascension and Im rated around the same after a year so idk how rare is rn mtn-htn compared to year ago
What?Normie doesn't mean shit
Average person is sub5, yet normie would mean mmtn
So you think the bell curve (fluctuating) decides what the PSL rankings (objective) are?What?
You can still be unattractive whilst being a normie, you don’t have to be mtn
ltns mtns and htns are all normies
I don’t understand the point your making
Let’s put it this way. How rare is someone on par with prime dicaprio / prime Ronaldo or even Clavicular in his most frauded photos?2-3%, though its hard to picture that 1 in 50-33 people are HTN.
Ronaldo has shitty harmony but his features carry him, I'd say somethin like hmtn cause he's not consistent
Di caprio is the opposite but he still has good features, htn but I can't make up my mind what tier.
Clav is low chad
Doesn't really change if they are htn or not, bell curve has nothin to do with itIn America? U tell me.
Mfs here average an IQ of 40Cause niggas on here rate these dudes as htn
Is clav seriously low Chad. To me he looks textbook htn in his prime in fallRonaldo has shitty harmony but his features carry him, I'd say somethin like hmtn cause he's not consistent
Di caprio is the opposite but he still has good features, htn but I can't make up my mind what tier.
Clav is low chad
Doesn't really change if they are htn or not, bell curve has nothin to do with it
Mfs here average an IQ of 40
He looks like the buffalo shooter so low chad for meIs clav seriously low Chad. To me he looks textbook htn in his prime in fall
Retard15th percentile in my opinion
jeez that’s an insane resemblance that nigga looks like clav if he was fat.He looks like the buffalo shooter so low chad for me![]()
gymcel clav is the same as himjeez that’s an insane resemblance that nigga looks like clav if he was fat.
But jokes aside objectively where would u put clav.
And as for the question where would u put someone like prime dicaprio in terms if rarity. Since u said he is textbook htn. One in 100?
Yes mtn is average regardless of how the average person looks at that time.So you think the bell curve (fluctuating) decides what the PSL rankings (objective) are?
Would that mean you believe that MTN is average, even if the average person was horrendously ugly or beautiful?
Also, stop saying "what" after you clearly interpreted what I said and made a coherent response on it
So someone like him, he's above the average person and many call him "ltn" while agreeing the average person is "sub5" in the subhuman senseYes mtn is average regardless of how the average person looks at that time.
Erm I think that would be the opposite right?If the average person was ugly that just means subhumans would be extra subhuman
It's a hypothetical to understand your principleBut it doesn’t really work like that it takes generations for the average to become significantly worse or better looking
I don’t think he is above averageSo someone like him, he's above the average person and many call him "ltn" while agreeing the average person is "sub5" in the subhuman sense
View attachment 5191476
Hence, do you think he'd be regarded as HTN because he's above the average (person) subhuman?
Erm I think that would be the opposite right?
It's a hypothetical to understand your principle
1.5-2.5% imoCuz I was rated mtn-htn before my ascension and Im rated around the same after a year so idk how rare is rn mtn-htn compared to year ago
yes, in PSL (objective) that is what I would consider ltn/mtn/sub5 etc, but your rating is a bell curve, so we can't definitively use it because we don't know the bell curve, + if people heard that wando is "htn" they'd go apeshitAnd also just to confirm when you say sub5 you mean less than 5/10 and not a rating below ltn (what I would call subhuman then ltn mtn etc)
The guy I just inserted is ltnIn order for me to understand why you think htn is top 1% would you mind showing me some ltn mtn htn examples?
I agree with all your ratingsyes, in PSL (objective) that is what I would consider ltn/mtn/sub5 etc, but your rating is a bell curve, so we can't definitively use it because we don't know the bell curve, + if people heard that wando is "htn" they'd go apeshit
The guy I just inserted is ltn
View attachment 5191521
This random dude is htn
Mtn
View attachment 5191524
In what universethe average person is around a subhuman-low ltn
average is ltn imo HEAVILY depends on if the average were talking about is national or global thoighIn what universe
I don’t agree, but at least it’s better than saying the average is subhumanaverage is ltn imo HEAVILY depends on if the average were talking about is national or global thoigh
Where would you plot the average at?I don’t agree, but at least it’s better than saying the average is subhuman
mtnWhere would you plot the average at?
mtn seems like a overrate if we’re talking globally mabye in some countries id consider mtn averagemtn
But I prefer just saying 1/10 in which i’d say 4.75-5.25
roughly 1 in 50-30 people are "htn", so 2-3%Cuz I was rated mtn-htn before my ascension and Im rated around the same after a year so idk how rare is rn mtn-htn compared to year ago