What psl is this chad

[Deleted member 14950]

 

[ChristianChad]

Manlet. Brutal

 

[Deleted member 14950]

Manlet. Brutal

What u mean brutal lool

 

[zeke714]

6 psl

 

[coolguy1]

feminine eyebrows

 

[one job away]

5 psl at best.

 

[Deleted member 14950]

5 psl at best.

Cope bro play the game son

 

[one job away]

Cope bro play the game son

Im not coping. He is definitely no chad. I see tons of dudes on this looks level. Does he look good ? Yeah. Is he special ? Absolutely not

 

[StrangerDanger]

Im not coping. He is definitely no chad. I see tons of dudes on this looks level. Does he look good ? Yeah. Is he special ? Absolutely not

cope

 

[LipstickAlley]

He looks gay as fuck

 

[one job away]

cope

If I cope I advise you to go to the mall on the weekend of you can manage to leave your basement. You guys are coping by saying an above average looking guy is top tier so you don’t look too bad in comparison.

 

[StrangerDanger]

If I cope I advise you to go to the mall on the weekend of you can manage to leave your basement. You guys are coping by saying an above average looking guy is top tier so you don’t look too bad in comparison.

you from north texas? dude is top 5% least

 

[one job away]

you from north texas? dude is top 5% least

No I’m not. And top 5% is not chad. Chad is more like 0.5%-0.1%. You think if you look like every 20th dude Girls give a fck about you ? I pass thousands of people everyday and if I see a chad once in a while I remember it. I don’t remember a guy who is top 5%

 

[one job away]

you from north texas? dude is top 5% least

IMO he is right in the middle between average and chad so 5 psl is actually a quite accurate rating IMO. He looks good but is he special ? No.

 

[Deleted member 14950]

He looks gay as fuck

Yeh he acts like a queer tbf

 

[Deleted member 14950]

IMO he is right in the middle between average and chad so 5 psl is actually a quite accurate rating IMO. He looks good but is he special ? No.

Well in UK this guy could get anyone

 

[StrangerDanger]

No I’m not. And top 5% is not chad. Chad is more like 0.5%-0.1%. You think if you look like every 20th dude Girls give a fck about you ? I pass thousands of people everyday and if I see a chad once in a while I remember it. I don’t remember a guy who is top 5%

top 5% is the least I gave him, he's higher. Mogs Timothee and Holland who's are 5 PSL. Mogs Ronaldo and Chris Evans who are 5.5. I think 5.75 PSL is fair

 

[Deleted member 756]

top 5% is the least I gave him, he's higher. Mogs Timothee and Holland who's are 5 PSL. Mogs Ronaldo and Chris Evans who are 5.5. I think 5.75 PSL is fair

Tom Holland?

 

[StrangerDanger]

Tom Holland?

Yes

 

[one job away]

top 5% is the least I gave him, he's higher. Mogs Timothee and Holland who's are 5 PSL. Mogs Ronaldo and Chris Evans who are 5.5. I think 5.75 PSL is fair

Tom Holland is average 4 psl.

chris Evans is more like a 4.5-4.75

cheistiano is IMO 5.5 and mogs this dude. Not by a lot but he does. Way better harmony.

this dude has a flat upper maxilla with large zygos and a narrow face and a weak cranium(or rounded forhead) which results in a rat look.

 

[Deleted member 4430]

Holland who's are 5 PSL. Mogs Ronaldo and Chris Evans who are 5.5. I think 5.75

all HTN

 

[StrangerDanger]

Tom Holland is average 4 psl.

chris Evans is more like a 4.5-4.75

cheistiano is IMO 5.5 and mogs this dude. Not by a lot but he does. Way better harmony.

this dude has a flat upper maxilla with large zygos and a narrow face and a weak cranium(or rounded forhead) which results in a rat look.

I'm going from this

Complete Guide to PSL ratings

What are PSL RATINGS? PSL ratings were created as a way of being able to determine ones aesthetic value and applying beauty standards to a rating system, based on solely their face. The central idea behind PSL ratings is not purely finding ones SMV/appeal, but it can be better described as...

looksmax.org

perhaps you do not agree

 

[bwrauycnee]

Is he wearing lipstick?

 

[Deleted member 10042]

Tom Holland is average 4 psl.

chris Evans is more like a 4.5-4.75

cheistiano is IMO 5.5 and mogs this dude. Not by a lot but he does. Way better harmony.

this dude has a flat upper maxilla with large zygos and a narrow face and a weak cranium(or rounded forhead) which results in a rat look.

Sit down you can't rate for shit

 

[Deleted member 14695]

Tom Holland is average 4 psl.

chris Evans is more like a 4.5-4.75

cheistiano is IMO 5.5 and mogs this dude. Not by a lot but he does. Way better harmony.

this dude has a flat upper maxilla with large zygos and a narrow face and a weak cranium(or rounded forhead) which results in a rat look.

I like the way you rate tbh., very based rater.

 

[Deleted member 14695]

I'm going from this

Complete Guide to PSL ratings

What are PSL RATINGS? PSL ratings were created as a way of being able to determine ones aesthetic value and applying beauty standards to a rating system, based on solely their face. The central idea behind PSL ratings is not purely finding ones SMV/appeal, but it can be better described as...

looksmax.org

perhaps you do not agree

The guide is actually pretty accirate compared to what 'one job' said.

 

[one job away]

I'm going from this

Complete Guide to PSL ratings

What are PSL RATINGS? PSL ratings were created as a way of being able to determine ones aesthetic value and applying beauty standards to a rating system, based on solely their face. The central idea behind PSL ratings is not purely finding ones SMV/appeal, but it can be better described as...

looksmax.org

perhaps you do not agree

Just as mewbrah said himself the percentages are off severely. If you think Christina Ronaldo is a 90-95% you are very wrong. That would mean that there would be 1 to 2 people on his lookslevel ON THE FIELD playing. Not even counting backups on the side. And Christiano clearly mogs pretty much everyone in his league. So hundreds of men(well around hundred+, there is probably someone as good looking in the league idk). Maybe one or two are as good looking but yeah. A 5.5 psl is clearly not a 90-95%

I never saw psl as the math bell curve thing and it never even was in the first place. It actually started out way different. From my knowledge It started as the standard out of 10 but by defining 10 as unachievable 9 became the max. A 10 was a perfect looking person (a 9) that was also your type. But since no one can be perfect looking people took 8 as the actual max a human can possibly achieve. Over time people took 8 as perfection and it just so happened to work decently with the bell curve.

To me it’s different again. It just so happens to correlate. I have humans looks basically in 5 to 6 category’s. Below average. Average = 4, above average but nothing special = 4-5 hottest guy in class type is like 4.8 psl, hottest guy in school so out of 100-150 people is like 5.5, hottest guy in multiple schools is psl 6+,
Hottest guy in a decent sized City 7+ psl

Those category’s are the ones I have in my head since they are what matters IRL. Basically those category’s decide if your looks halo you or not.
If you are a hottest guy in class type of you go on events with 20-30 people you will be haloed like Crazy. On a event like a festival with hundreds of dudes you are just some random dude. For looks to halo you you need to be atleast 5.5 category(chadlite). Once you are chad so 6psl looks halo no matter where you are. Those categories IMO are just way better to determine looks. Aka normie, htn, chadlite, chad , gigachad. And those with tendency’s. The numbers are just cuz people want to get rated on numbers apparently. I don’t.

 

[Deleted member 14950]

Tom Holland is average 4 psl.

chris Evans is more like a 4.5-4.75

cheistiano is IMO 5.5 and mogs this dude. Not by a lot but he does. Way better harmony.

this dude has a flat upper maxilla with large zygos and a narrow face and a weak cranium(or rounded forhead) which results in a rat look.

Just as mewbrah said himself the percentages are off severely. If you think Christina Ronaldo is a 90-95% you are very wrong. That would mean that there would be 1 to 2 people on his lookslevel ON THE FIELD playing. Not even counting backups on the side. And Christiano clearly mogs pretty much everyone in his league. So hundreds of men(well around hundred+, there is probably someone as good looking in the league idk). Maybe one or two are as good looking but yeah. A 5.5 psl is clearly not a 90-95%

I never saw psl as the math bell curve thing and it never even was in the first place. It actually started out way different. From my knowledge It started as the standard out of 10 but by defining 10 as unachievable 9 became the max. A 10 was a perfect looking person (a 9) that was also your type. But since no one can be perfect looking people took 8 as the actual max a human can possibly achieve. Over time people took 8 as perfection and it just so happened to work decently with the bell curve.

To me it’s different again. It just so happens to correlate. I have humans looks basically in 5 to 6 category’s. Below average. Average = 4, above average but nothing special = 4-5 hottest guy in class type is like 4.8 psl, hottest guy in school so out of 100-150 people is like 5.5, hottest guy in multiple schools is psl 6+,
Hottest guy in a decent sized City 7+ psl

Those category’s are the ones I have in my head since they are what matters IRL. Basically those category’s decide if your looks halo you or not.
If you are a hottest guy in class type of you go on events with 20-30 people you will be haloed like Crazy. On a event like a festival with hundreds of dudes you are just some random dude. For looks to halo you you need to be atleast 5.5 category(chadlite). Once you are chad so 6psl looks halo no matter where you are. Those categories IMO are just way better to determine looks. Aka normie, htn, chadlite, chad , gigachad. And those with tendency’s. The numbers are just cuz people want to get rated on numbers apparently. I don’t.

DJ me bro I wanna ask something

 

[Deleted member 14950]

DJ me bro I wanna ask something

Dm*

 

[one job away]

DJ me bro I wanna ask something

I don’t like rating people bro. I only like giving advise if I can.

 

[Biiyo03]

I don’t like rating people bro. I only like giving advise if I can.

Tom holland is definitely above average though, maybe not 5 but 4.5-4.75 isvery fair, chris evans 4.5-4.75 is a pretty big underrate. Hes definitely 5 at least (right now when hes old) and at least 5.5 when he was in his prime (fantastics for reference) but not more than 6, maybe 5.75 max. Cristiano I agree with like 5.25-5.5 or so.

i did say the dude is 6 at first but i take it back , he is like 5.4-5.5 max

 

[Deleted member 10615]

guy is like a 6psl pretty boy

 

[one job away]

Tom holland is definitely above average though, maybe not 5 but 4.5-4.75 isvery fair, chris evans 4.5-4.75 is a pretty big underrate. Hes definitely 5 at least (right now when hes old) and at least 5.5 when he was in his prime (fantastics for reference) but not more than 6, maybe 5.75 max. Cristiano I agree with like 5.25-5.5 or so.

i did say the dude is 6 at first but i take it back , he is like 5.4-5.5 max

Yeah chris Evans a 5.25 In fantastic is fair ngl. But tom Holland is IMO a 4.25-4.4 at best. If you read my explanation a 4.8 is like the hottest dude in class and he is defneitly not that.

Either way those numbers are IMO stupid. I rather rate in htn average chad chadlite. It’s how the real world rates anyways.

 

[Biiyo03]

Yeah chris Evans a 5.25 In fantastic is fair ngl. But tom Holland is IMO a 4.25-4.4 at best. If you read my explanation a 4.8 is like the hottest dude in class and he is defneitly not that.

Either way those numbers are IMO stupid. I rather rate in htn average chad chadlite. It’s how the real world rates anyways.

Yeah i think i overrated holland imo, i think 4.5 max is fair for him. I stand by the rest of my other ratings tho

tom holland is htn and chris and christiano are solid chadlites facially

 

[Deleted member 11388]

5.75-6psl.

why are all facially good lookong guys manlets ?