D
Deleted member 51358
broken but not destroyed
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2023
- Posts
- 32,903
- Reputation
- 58,833
im interested to know
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Then stop taking 5ar inhibbeing good looking
Antinatialism is incel copeAntinatalism
social darwinismim interested to know
I disagree heavily with social Darwinismsocial darwinism
Why?I disagree heavily with social Darwinism
Society isn’t meritocraticWhy?
That's not social darwinism. Social darwinism says that good qualities are based on genes.Society isn’t meritocratic
Social darwinism says that good qualities are based on genes.

It’s used mostly in the sense to convey the idea that people at the top of society are there because they are inherently more fit for living in societyThat's not social darwinism. Social darwinism says that good qualities are based on genes.
With the idea that people with certain genes are better. Social darwinism is kind of an umbrella term. Some ppl define it differentlyHow are you defining social Darwinism
A life without contemplation isn’t a life at allvibes
all these philosophy nerds talk about 'muh existentialism', 'nihilism is goated!', 'stoicism is based!'
bhai...operate of vibes and pure emotion. don't overthink it![]()
Yes and i fully agree with this.It’s used mostly in the sense to convey the idea that people at the top of society are there because they are inherently more fit for living in society
I agree somewhat in the sense that they’re better at certain thingsWith the idea that people with certain genes are better
I thought u meant on existenceNothing fixed
Ranges from solipsism and thinking the universe is inside my mind/I'm experiencing a simulation and everyone is an NPC, to an atheist view, to thinking I'm god
this would only be true in a meritocratic societyYes and i fully agree with this.
People are driven by both logic and emotionvibes
all these philosophy nerds talk about 'muh existentialism', 'nihilism is goated!', 'stoicism is based!'
bhai...operate of vibes and pure emotion. don't overthink it![]()
I myself believe that genes are that which we call, inherent worthI agree somewhat in the sense that they’re better at certain things
A 180 iq person is gonna be better at math than a 70 iq person
But I don’t believe the 180 iq person is better in any grand inherent sense
Because I don’t believe inherent worth exists in the first place
Yesvibes
all these philosophy nerds talk about 'muh existentialism', 'nihilism is goated!', 'stoicism is based!'
bhai...operate of vibes and pure emotion. don't overthink it![]()
We have an idea of inherent worth and I would say that most of the things which we ascribe to contribute to inherent worth are mostly out of our controlI myself believe that genes are that which we call, inherent worth
Nature is the pure source. Nature supplies us with genes.We have an idea of inherent worth and I would say that most of the things which we ascribe to contribute to inherent worth are mostly out of our control
But I wouldn’t necessarily say genes are the pure source of it but they are a big contributor
fair enoughPeople are driven by both logic and emotion
They are synchronic, but it's still good to have a grounded logical view that underlies your emotions so that you can fallback on it during times were your emotions may be making you act irrational
meds buddyRanges from solipsism and thinking the universe is inside my mind/I'm experiencing a simulation and everyone is an NPC, to an atheist view, to thinking I'm god
fr, damn tweakersmeds buddy
Yesmeds buddy
Society atleast in its ideal state places most worth on characterNature is the pure source. Nature supplies us with genes.
dut at this point bro
Society should place worth on pure potential.Society atleast in its ideal state places most worth on character
Whether a person is “good” is the measure of a man good usually meaning the Kantian view on ethics
We know of course character doesn’t factor in much in reality but society idealizes it is the point
Most people would say an 80 iq sub 5 manlet who gives to charity is more valuable than a 200 iq 6’5 gigachad serial killer
So is character genetic? Somewhat but it’s mostly environmental I’d say
Tall rich GL people usually have better characters than ugly sub 5s because they have better experiences in life
I'm cutting them into 4dut at this point bro
cant even get fin legally in the dictatorship of the united kingdomI'm cutting them into 4
A year's supply

the stranger of albert camus is goatedAbsurdism View attachment 3653739

I believe that values should be self created rather than derived from external sourcesSociety should place worth on pure potential.
The 200 iq 6'5 gigachad serial killer has infinitely more potential than the sub 5 manlet who has an iq of 80.
Absurdism is basedAbsurdism View attachment 3653739