What Should The Age Of Consent Be.

That’s societal teachings and culture. Not biological like alcohol.

So at the very least you would have to admit its situational where as drugs are worse and more destructive no matter what.
That's what I've been trying to say basically

Ideally all I care about is that if you're gonna allow someone to do something potentially destructive like sex, give them proper info on what they're getting into. 18 is what I believe is the average age one has the knowledge.

Still not trying to see young girls and boys getting passed around but that's just me
 
View attachment 2964040
mfs want age of consent to be 12 to breed with girls like this..... idk how yall can even be attracted to girls below 16-17 ish age range
I wouldnt go below 15 but thats probably because youre older than me as im 18

though 15 is the lowest id go
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, LooksmaxxHopeful and Deleted member 22888
if she bleeds she can breed, there should be no concrete number

generally tho id lower it to 12
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful and watah
if she bleeds she can breed, there should be no concrete number

generally tho id lower it to 12
You want to lower it to 12 out of your preference or is there some other reason?
 
13-14 is fine. They are adolescents in puberty and know what they are doing.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful and Deleted member 44486
14.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful and Deleted member 70955
could argue 16 but then setup romeo&juliet laws for those under 16
I use to think it should be 17, but now I'm thinking 15/16 is reasonable.
 
It's 16 in most of the world and I don't see why it should be anything else
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep and LooksmaxxHopeful
13. Silly to throw people in jail for consensual sex.
Like 1/3rd of 13 yr olds are still pre-pubescent so that's kind of pushing it
 
15 imo. But it should match whatever the minimum age of driving is of the country/state. If you're old enough to drive then you're old enough to have sex with adults
Used to disagree with this, now I think I agree.
 
Fr, now if someone has sex with a girl or boy who is not able to give offspring yet then imo it's weird, even disgusting if we talk about very little children, but people were having sex since 13 years old back then because it has a biological purpose which is to maximize the potential offspring one can leave, i find really retarded to think a 14yo cant fuck with someone far older, i wanted to bang milfs since i have memory so imo not a problem at all, i cringe when i see those tiktoks or yt videos about "catching pedos"
True when I was 15 literally all I did was beat off to MILFs, JFL at the the idea that if one had had sex with me I had been preyed on
 
  • +1
Reactions: Andremln
View attachment 2964040
mfs want age of consent to be 12 to breed with girls like this..... idk how yall can even be attracted to girls below 16-17 ish age range
This is what Kate Upton looked like at 15 years old

1722827984408
 
🙏
 

Attachments

  • C93668C9-90F6-49B2-A901-BCAA7482B724.jpeg
    C93668C9-90F6-49B2-A901-BCAA7482B724.jpeg
    25.3 KB · Views: 0
  • JFL
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful, nullandvoid, Andremln and 1 other person

It's 25% but still, that's literally a quarter, and medically speaking the pre-pubescent age range is 13 and under.

16+ is legal in most of the world and that's usually when the average woman is post-pubescent so that makes the most sense, also most 16 yr old females are virgins (statistically) so 16 is also a good age in terms of chastity.
 
14.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful
16+ is legal in most of the world and that's usually when the average woman is post-pubescent so that makes the most sense, also most 16 yr old females are virgins (statistically) so 16 is also a good age in terms of chastity.
No, what makes sense is pubescence. You are advocating for sexually mature females to be illegal.
 
The person has to have reached puberty and must be physically able to have sexual relations. This is different from puberty, since sometimes a girl or boy may have reached puberty but may not be physically able to have sexual relations, such as in the case of precocious puberty. Contrarily a girl or boy may be able to have sexual relations but may not have reached puberty such as in the case of delayed puberty.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful
No, what makes sense is pubescence. You are advocating for sexually mature females to be illegal.
Just because she's hit puberty doesn't mean she's fully developed, the average 12 yr old female isn't that attractive because she's only in the early stages of development, 14-16+ makes more sense as that's when women are post-pubescent
 
No duh.

14 max.
There's a huge statistical difference between 12-13 and 14-15, 25-50% of 12-13 yr olds are literally pre-pubescent children lol.
 

Similar threads

Vermilioncore
Replies
10
Views
104
Deleted member 153838
D
avenox
Replies
4
Views
49
avenox
avenox
fukmylyf
Replies
27
Views
402
chudlight
C
throwaway2
Replies
22
Views
245
Arcane
Arcane
talcel
Replies
12
Views
77
talcel
talcel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top