What would the world have to look like for it to be non hypergamous

[presible]

Title

 

[Matrix88]

Force every relationship to be a looksmatch

 

[presible]

Force every relationship to be a looksmatch

That could work

 

[shngstaaaa107]

abandon all judgement by appearance and status and find true love

 

[Gudlifer]

That could work

dumbass



basically universal laws of life would have to change for that to happen (mark as solution)

 

[shngstaaaa107]

dumbass



basically universal laws of life would have to change for that to happen (mark as solution)

Just says "what would it look like" not "what would need to happen"

 

[presible]

dumbass



basically universal laws of life would have to change for that to happen (mark as solution)

Are you talking about the fact woman naturally go for what’s better the fact it’s just built into there brain and there just wired that way?

 

[SoylentChamp]

bringing back arranged marriages, basically secular society

 

[Gudlifer]

Just says "what would it look like" not "what would need to happen"

youre an idiot

Are you talking about the fact woman naturally go for what’s better the fact it’s just built into there brain and there just wired that way?

yh and humans or any form of life even at the cellular level

 

[shngstaaaa107]

youre an idiotView attachment 5596358

yh and humans or any form of life even at the cellular level

"What would the world have to look like for it to be non hypergamous" could be read in the manner of

What would the world have to look like, in order to be classified as non hypergamous

or, as you've interpreted

To reach a non hypergamous world, what would have to happen, which barely applies given "Have to look like", as opposed to "Have to be done"

 

[Gudlifer]

"What would the world have to look like for it to be non hypergamous" could be read in the manner of

What would the world have to look like, in order to be classified as non hypergamous

or, as you've interpreted

To reach a non hypergamous world, what would have to happen, which barely applies given "Have to look like", as opposed to "Have to be done"

crazy how you cant understand a simple sentence, sad

 

[shngstaaaa107]

crazy how you cant understand a simple sentence, sad

Many sentences can have different interpretations, you haven't exactly stated why mine is wrong

You're also free to ask OP what he meant.

 

[Gudlifer]

Many sentences can have different interpretations, you haven't exactly stated why mine is wrong

You're also free to ask OP what he meant.

if he meant to ask what it would look like he would've just put "what would it look like" not, "what would it HAVE (im not sure you understand the meaning and role of this word in the sentence) to look like"

 

[Kahoas]

Not possible

 

[shngstaaaa107]

if he meant to ask what it would look like he would've just put "what would it look like" not, "what would it HAVE (im not sure you understand the meaning and role of this word in the sentence) to look like"

"have to look like" is sort of oxymoronic, have to as in "a guaranteed action" and look like referring to a prospect, assuming, something not real or true, its like a double negative or two opposites if you get what I mean here

It doesn't HAVE TO look like anything, it's an open ended question that you're asking us

I don't think "have to" insinuates anything about how the sentence is meant to be taken im sort of just hung up about getting called a dumbass for a slightly different interpretation

Youre entitled to yours as well