Mitläufer
I'm in the Gandyverse
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2025
- Posts
- 4,395
- Reputation
- 4,598
Pretty much you have alot of new thoughts and new ideas everytime and you see patterns easier und quicker
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You can also go crazy because of the pattern recognitionlikely very depressing and isolating
Goethe was 200 rightThat also but intelligence varies alot, there is spatial, memory, fluid etc. It varies a person can have strong pattern recognition but poor abstract reasoning and vice versa, usually combination of every single intelligence trait as being higher than usual is what results in a high iq (130 - 150 which is already rare) a 200 iq is one in a century type of thing, most of the people claiming that are just larping, with that iq number you don't just see the underlying rules of a structure or a system? You are able to manipulate and change them, very few people in history had that ability
Around 150-160 , 200 is a hypergenius one in a few centuriesGoethe was 200 right
examples of hypergeniusAround 150-160 , 200 is a hypergenius one in a few centuries
Leonardo Da Vinci, William James Sidi, Leonhard Euler, Isaac Newtonexamples of hypergenius
@FlourideGoyiumexamples of hypergenius
all iqletsLeonardo Da Vinci, William James Sidi, Leonhard Euler, Isaac Newton
Not really true. Terence Tao is probably the closest thing in the modern day we have to this and reportedly he makes mistakes in his lectures and forgets shit all the time and is pretty normal, most of the historical high iq freaks crashed out because they were just experiments and abused by their parents rather than being literaly 200iq.It doesn't exist. If it did you'd never get outsmarted even in social situations, never look the fool. Other people would literally be like monkeys by comparison. They're just moderately better at logic puzzles and shit involving memory in reality, and learn quicker. Past like 150 it's basically speculation what someones IQ is anyways.
You just agreed with me, dumbassNot really true. Terence Tao is probably the closest thing in the modern day we have to this and reportedly he makes mistakes in his lectures and forgets shit all the time and is pretty normal, most of the historical high iq freaks crashed out because they were just experiments and abused by their parents rather than being literaly 200iq.
You just agreed with me, dumbass
no i didnt faggotnever look the fool
indeedlikely very depressing and isolating
examples of hypergenius
IQ is just one part. There's many different. The people you mentioned other than Sidis had maxed out creativity tooLeonardo Da Vinci, William James Sidi, Leonhard Euler, Isaac Newton
Grothendieckexamples of hypergenius
You did, goofyno i didnt faggot