What's more important: frame or body fat % ?

[UnderTheKnife]

I want to reduce my body fat percentage further (I am at 18% now); but I am hesitating because I have thin wrists and ankles, which would appear even more thin if I lose more fat.

What do you advise?

 

[thereallegend]

nigga both

 

[Bitch]

Frame is much harder to improve if you're not blasting T, meanwhile losing body fat naturally is much easier

 

[Constantin Denis]

both. Gain muscle and loose bodyfat.

 

[UnderTheKnife]

both. Gain muscle and loose bodyfat.

But no amount of muscle can compensate for thin wrists...

 

[Deleted member 5815]

both, starve and spam lateral raises & overhead presses

 

[Gluteus]

But no amount of muscle can compensate for thin wrists...

Yes it does.

A thin frame with a good muscular base still appears strong and masculine.

A thin frame with no muscles and you're basically fucked unless you have an exceptional face or are in junior high.

 

[TITUS]

I advise to rope.

 

[BucketCrab]

Hard question.
Frame is fucking useless without definition.
But definition can't save a shit frame.

I'd say Frame simply because it can't be changed easily, while losing fat is a lot easier than changing your frame without surgery.

 

[Deleted member 15827]

Yes it does.

A thin frame with a good muscular base still appears strong and masculine.

A thin frame with no muscles and you're basically fucked unless you have an exceptional face or are in junior high.

Frame doesn't matter unless u have ridiculously bad frame

 

[Deleted member 2106]

Are you between 10-12% bodyfat? If not, don't even think about bulking.

- unless you are literally underweight BMI

This is true no matter your frame

 

[MagaPutinism]

There is no man that is attractive at high bodyfat they just don't exist, for wrist size do dead hangs then progress to dead hang with a towel and eat enough protein, nobody sees your ankle so don't worry