what's the point of having an objective scale and rating tools if you don't follow them/can't understand the aesthetic scale anyway?

[Deleted member 25059]

I objectively listed the reasons why certain men have PSL they have and anyway i found many people grasping to straws under my threads.

Muh appeal, muh women gaze, round eyes are ideal, recessed chin is ideal, no browridge is ideal

if you can't understand that PSL is an aesthetic scale according to certain ratios, features, cranial development and a pinch of aesthetics verified during the time of PLS existence and has nothing to do with what some group of women like (for a logical reason because it's subjective), then you should legit take an iq test.

but it doesn't surprise me, when you realize that there are users who consider every stupid thing they pay for (microblading lol) as a success and automatically add 0.5 psl

 

[Deleted member 25059]

.

 

[Deleted member 25059]

2023

 

[mogger123]

looks are binary, your have them or you don't. And they can't be analysed with reductionism, a holistic approach is required

 

[Deleted member 25059]

.

 

[Deleted member 19036]

I objectively listed the reasons why certain men have PSL they have and anyway i found many people grasping to straws under my threads.

Muh appeal, muh women gaze, round eyes are ideal, recessed chin is ideal, no browridge is ideal

if you can't understand that PSL is an aesthetic scale according to certain ratios, features, cranial development and a pinch of aesthetics verified during the time of PLS existence and has nothing to do with what some group of women like (for a logical reason because it's subjective), then you should legit take an iq test.

but it doesn't surprise me, when you realize that there are users who consider every stupid thing they pay for (microblading lol) as a success and automatically add 0.5 psl

spergin around