wheat waffles is a fraud

[killuacel]

 

[ICXCLuvr]

I used to watch him when I was 11 but what makes him a fraud

 

[killuacel]

I used to watch him when I was 11 but what makes him a fraud

you'll have 2 watch the video to find out

 

[slaviccartfiend]

he's an ugly faggot so idc what he has to say i cant stand his face and voice

 

[silently_said]

Why did ganstar delete his older videos

 

[ICXCLuvr]

you'll have 2 watch the video to find out

Pls summarize

 

[ICXCLuvr]

he's an ugly faggot so idc what he has to say i cant stand his face and voice

How are u gonna call
Someone a daggot while simultaneously mentioning his facial attractiveness lol

 

[pfl]

 

[killuacel]

Why did ganstar delete his older videos

im not sure

 

[WonkyChin186]

hes 5'7

next to hexumlite

 

[killuacel]

View attachment 5555642
Pls summarize

“Wheat Waffles Is A Fraud” by Gantpill (uploaded around 23 Aug 2026; ~16 minutes long; ~1,000 views at the time of checking) is a critical reaction/exposé video from the blackpill/looksmaxxing community.

youtube.com
The narrator (Gantpill) mocks Wheat Waffles (called “ginger sprag,” “ginger fraud,” etc.) and tears into his face-rating style and online behavior. Main points include:

• Overly generous / inconsistent ratings: Wheat Waffles rates relatively ordinary-looking men as Chads or high on the scale (e.g., a guy as a 6 with potential to hit 7 just by losing some facial fat; others as 7s or 8s). The narrator argues these lack structure and standards, treating average faces as elite.
• The “Stacy” example: A specific girlfriend/partner is rated as a high-tier “Stacy.” Gantpill strongly disagrees, saying she’s average (or below elite level), that makeup doesn’t change this, and that such inflation lowers standards community-wide—making normal women feel elite and raising their expectations unrealistically.
• Response to criticism: When commenters disagree with ratings, Wheat Waffles allegedly insults them (e.g., for lacking profile pics), demands they show “their Stacies,” and abandons the discussion instead of defending the ratings with logic. The narrator highlights how critics dismantle the claims with basic common sense.
• Other shots: References to rivalry with Face IQ, Wheat Waffles claiming a Mensa-measured IQ of ~133, making significant money from paid ratings (mentioned as over a quarter million at one point), past “I’m quitting YouTube” drama (with returns), and self-rating as at least a 6. The video also notes limited real-world dating evidence (e.g., zero Tinder matches in Miami) and argues fame or small sample sizes (like a UK boy-band connection) don’t prove “Chad” status universally.

Overall tone is sarcastic and confrontational. It frames Wheat Waffles’ ratings as damaging because they lack objective structure, inflate mediocre looks, and fuel poor standards/arguments in the community. It ends by challenging whether his claimed high IQ will produce a solid response or more dodging.Hashtags/context: #blackpill #looksmaxxing #faceiq. This is niche community drama/content analyzing attractiveness ratings and personalities within that scene.

 

[bimaxmaxxer]

wheat waffles is just the very bottom of the barrel of the blackpill.

I suggest channels like rehab room or thinking ape