greycel
It's easy to be Good in a World with God 🧑🏻🌾
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2023
- Posts
- 15,798
- Reputation
- 37,736
Yes.. ignore my pointNah, it's this SIMPLE -- if you look good with VERY LITTLE MAKEUP, you are a good looking woman. It's insane that a BLACK MAN is better at properly rating WHITE WOMEN than everyone else here -- PSL doesn't matter much for women, it's much more about APPEAL. White women look BEST in their normal skin, FRIENDLY with a CUTE SMILE -- I mean, if you want to date an ETHNIC woman then why not just get THAT instead of a white woman PRETENDING to look like one in edited photos?
View attachment 4200046View attachment 4200065 View attachment 4200068View attachment 4200047
Anyways, I agree with what you said
But also they wouldn't be "HTB"there's less of a correlation for Appeal and PSL for women than men.
The PSL system was made to rate men
Their PSL score is lower but their ranks are relative. MTB is more aesthetic than 50% of women, up to Terrastacy and other side of scale
This was what me and @pfl were talking about earlier today.
IMO if everybody woke up tomorrow and was the equivalent to what an LTN is right now, he'd be a Terrachad.. just the PSL tier ranges have shifted on the 0-8PSL scale
He would wake up tomorrow getting Terrachad treatment, so that's his rank
Also you say all girls are capped to HTB. What's the reasoning behind it?
I can only think of 2.. either it's a loooksmatch with male versions (best looking girls unfrauded have a similar PSL score as an unfrauded HTN)... or it is relative to women with makeup?
But this 2nd one doesn't make sense, you're just saying the jump involving frauding is high (I'm guessing u meant comparing to men who fraud)
Anyways, in both situations, what about bone foggers with good skin?
For me entry SL is top 1% aesthetics.
Her without makeup has a higher PSL score than HTNs (0-8PSL) + is more aesthetic than 100 girls with makeup.
@pfl rate no makeup PSL?

do yall think I overate or underate girls?