When is the best time to take peptides?

nebpill

nebpill

“Just be confident bro”
Joined
Jul 19, 2025
Posts
151
Reputation
63
Is it in puberty, late puberty, afterwards etc? Also would help with knowing the best risk/reward peptides too.
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Helvetier and Orka
when ur six foot deep
 
Is it in puberty, late puberty, afterwards etc? Also would help with knowing the best risk/reward peptides too.
Depends on which peptides you are talking about about. I’m assuming you’re talking about GH related peptides.

If so, I recommend doing milder peptides around mid puberty (14-16), such as CJC-1295 no dac & Ipamorelin. You can also do CJC-1295 with dac but at lower doses.

In later stages, HGH is also a good option and is considered a peptide. Be careful though because it’s more potent with more side effects. And costs more…

Mark this as solution 👍
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: l1ghtsz, King_Schnitzel, HtnGymcel and 1 other person
Depends on which peptides you are talking about about. I’m assuming you’re talking about GH related peptides.

If so, I recommend doing milder peptides around mid puberty (14-16), such as CJC-1295 no dac & Ipamorelin. You can also do CJC-1295 with dac but at lower doses.

In later stages, HGH is also a good option and is considered a peptide. Be careful though because it’s more potent with more side effects. And costs more…

Mark this as solution 👍
Please stop giving advice
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bishoplol, hoping to improve and GoErOnFoids
Is it in puberty, late puberty, afterwards etc? Also would help with knowing the best risk/reward peptides too.
You need to be on HGH over the course of 3-5 years, while your growth plates are open and the average boost to height is 3.5-7.5cms. But it depends on some other factors
 
What’s wrong with the advice then retard?
Depends on which peptides you are talking about about. I’m assuming you’re talking about GH related peptides.

If so, I recommend doing milder peptides around mid puberty (14-16), such as CJC-1295 no dac & Ipamorelin. You can also do CJC-1295 with dac but at lower doses.
milder peptides :lul: wtf will CJC and Ipa do bro, fucking nothing. Let the kid save up money for surgery in the future and be healthy through puberty.
 
  • +1
Reactions: GoErOnFoids
milder peptides :lul: wtf will CJC and Ipa do bro, fucking nothing. Let the kid save up money for surgery in the future and be healthy through puberty.
That’s why I said they are milder :lul:. They will assist him a little during earlier stages. He didn’t ask for a life plan to save up for surgery, he asked about peptides and the affects Iqlet
 
  • +1
Reactions: Helvetier
That’s why I said they are milder :lul:. They will assist him a little during earlier stages. He didn’t ask for a life plan to save up for surgery, he asked about peptides and the affects Iqlet
Okay? maybe you should tell him the truth instead of him wasting money on shit that doesnt work
 
They will work though, if you look at all the studies that have been conducted using CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin. You can see they do have an effect 🙄
send studies and you didnt mention what purpose (so im assuming height)
 
Is it in puberty, late puberty, afterwards etc? Also would help with knowing the best risk/reward peptides too.
In puberty tanner 3.5
Depends on which peptides you are talking about about. I’m assuming you’re talking about GH related peptides.

If so, I recommend doing milder peptides around mid puberty (14-16), such as CJC-1295 no dac & Ipamorelin. You can also do CJC-1295 with dac but at lower doses.

In later stages, HGH is also a good option and is considered a peptide. Be careful though because it’s more potent with more side effects. And costs more…

Mark this as solution 👍
Dont mark this as a solution its bullshit advice from tiktok💀💀 why would you do HGH later on and waste time with cope-1295 no dac
 
You need to be on HGH over the course of 3-5 years, while your growth plates are open and the average boost to height is 3.5-7.5cms. But it depends on some other factors
Yeah but you're partially wrong, a healthy teen needs only about 2 cycles of 4-6 months hgh to get significant results, not 3 to 5 years, thats for deficient children and it's a whole other case
 
  • +1
Reactions: nebpill and PlzEndIt
Yeah but you're partially wrong, a healthy teen needs only about 2 cycles of 4-6 months hgh to get significant results, not 3 to 5 years, thats for deficient children and it's a whole other case
cycles of HGH pack it up bro please educate your self
 
cycles of HGH pack it up bro please educate your self
Its a fucking expression you ignorant tard, its used to describe a protocol for an extended period of time, you iqlets cannot even comprehend basic things, and i am literally more educated than you😂
 
Its a fucking expression you ignorant tard, its used to describe a protocol for an extended period of time, you iqlets cannot even comprehend basic things, and i am literally more educated than you😂
dnr your grey and please show evidence that those "2 cycles" of 4-6 months of HGH at a mystery dose since you dont list it, can cause significant results which you also dont list what who knows maybe my toenails will grow faster
 
send studies and you didnt mention what purpose (so im assuming height)
They boost growth hormone,
 
They boost growth hormone,
wow no fucking shit they boost growth hormone??? yea so how does that assist in a healthy teen during puberty
 
In puberty tanner 3.5

Dont mark this as a solution its bullshit advice from tiktok💀💀 why would you do HGH later on and waste time with cope-1295 no dac
Because excessive exogenous growth hormone may stunt your growth retard
 
dnr your grey and please show evidence that those "2 cycles" of 4-6 months of HGH at a mystery dose since you dont list it, can cause significant results which you also dont list what who knows maybe my toenails will grow faster
"Grey" and has more knowledge than you btw😂😂 ofc you did not read you are too mentally challenged to even understand what im saying (common publicly available knowledge btw), Iqmaxx pls
 
"Grey" and has more knowledge than you btw😂😂 ofc you did not read you are too mentally challenged to even understand what im saying (common publicly available knowledge btw), Iqmaxx pls
literaally didnt provide a single molecule of evidence?? fucking grey lmao you dont know anything, you make claims with 0 evidence
 
literaally didnt provide a single molecule of evidence?? fucking grey lmao you dont know anything, you make claims with 0 evidence
Theres plenty of sources online mate, im not the one whos a clueless grey lmao😂 if you're not even capable of searching online for such info, do not ever respond to me again, its literally known that a few protocols of gh can boost total height gains, altough the cms depend on several factors, fuck your source its common knowledge idiot
 
Theres plenty of sources online mate, im not the one whos a clueless grey lmao😂 if you're not even capable of searching online for such info, do not ever respond to me again, its literally known that a few protocols of gh can boost total height gains, altough the cms depend on several factors, fuck your source its common knowledge idiot
"muh common knowledge" 0 evidence so your claim is irrelevant
 
literaally didnt provide a single molecule of evidence?? fucking grey lmao you dont know anything, you make claims with 0 evidence
But Its kinda crazy that Human GROWTH Hormone (which has been studied and proved to increase total height for over decades now) needs to be proven through ultra specific links😂😂😂 typical clueless grey logic, altough if you insist:
Deodati et al., Ital J Pediatr 2020: +4-7 cm height in ISS teens.
Albertsson-Wikland et al., JCEM 2008: +4-5 cm, 0.067 mg/kg/day.
Leschek et al., JCEM 2004: +4.7 cm in peri-pubertal ISS.
Cohen et al., Int J Pediatr Endocrinol 2014: +7-8 cm in 123 ISS teens.
Högler et al., Bone 2005: +1-2 cm frame, +5-15% BMC/BMD.
Barake et al., JCEM 2014: +4-6% BMD, +5-10% BMC.
Ohlsson et al., Endocrine Rev 1998: GH/IGF-1 bone size/mass.
Grimberg et al., JCEM 2016: ISS prevalence, $20-30k/year.
Ko et al., Clin Pediatr Endocrinol 2020: +2-3 cm short-term.
van der Steen et al., Horm Res Paediatr 2012: Plate closure at 16-18
.
Then says im uneducated when im prob the one who has the most knowledge on those topics on this entire forum. Touch real endocrinology books, not some heavily flawed org thread
Prob too ignorant and challenged to even read the asked sources lmao
 
wow no fucking shit they boost growth hormone??? yea so how does that assist in a healthy teen during puberty
1000005557

Are you actually serious?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mirin_lol
You both are retards @Oesteogenesis i feel my neurons slightly slowing now
Excessive exogenous growth hormone will accelerate bone age and therefore may mature the process of how fast your epiphyseal fusion will occur
 
Excessive exogenous growth hormone will accelerate bone age and therefore may mature the process of how fast your epiphyseal fusion will occur
No it only happens if E2 rises and HGH isnt the main cause, also it just means you'll grow taller faster and maximize the most of your height? Not end up shorter
 
No it only happens if E2 rises and HGH isnt the main cause, also it just means you'll grow taller faster and maximize the most of your height? Not end up shorter
True but it does depend, if you have godly genetics and tall parents, it may make you grow quicker but you won't reach your full potential by the time your growth plates close. If you have short parents and worse genetics, you may end up taller than predicted, which is why I recommend it at later stages, right before growth plates close
 
Thats not how it works buddy, GH linear growth is the same for everybody who isnt deficient, you will always maximize your total height gains and grow faster
 
No tell me how more GH in teens help with their puberty? If they are healthy ofc if were talking height show me studies
i literally showed you the studies🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️ how ignorant are you?? HGH literally helps to grow even more, fym how does that help them in puberty
 
But Its kinda crazy that Human GROWTH Hormone (which has been studied and proved to increase total height for over decades now) needs to be proven

through ultra specific links😂😂😂 typical clueless grey logic, altough if you insist:
Deodati et al., Ital J Pediatr 2020: +4-7 cm height in ISS teens.
Albertsson-Wikland et al., JCEM 2008: +4-5 cm, 0.067 mg/kg/day.
Leschek et al., JCEM 2004: +4.7 cm in peri-pubertal ISS.
Cohen et al., Int J Pediatr Endocrinol 2014: +7-8 cm in 123 ISS teens.
Högler et al., Bone 2005: +1-2 cm frame, +5-15% BMC/BMD.
Barake et al., JCEM 2014: +4-6% BMD, +5-10% BMC.
Ohlsson et al., Endocrine Rev 1998: GH/IGF-1 bone size/mass.
Grimberg et al., JCEM 2016: ISS prevalence, $20-30k/year.
Ko et al., Clin Pediatr Endocrinol 2020: +2-3 cm short-term.
van der Steen et al., Horm Res Paediatr 2012: Plate closure at 16-18
ISS teens and GHD teens btw so your claim is still not valid since theres not a source on healthy individuals
.

Then says im uneducated when im prob the one who has the most knowledge on those topics on this entire forum. Touch real endocrinology books, not some heavily flawed org thread
Prob too ignorant and challenged to even read the asked sources lmao
 
No tell me how more GH in teens help with their puberty? If they are healthy ofc if were talking height show me studies
Skeletal growth, muscle development, keeping and building lean body mass, these all benefits of growth hormone, which peptides produce. I don’t get what your argument is, peptides are cheap and have benefits with limited side effects. You are aggressive and ignorant for no apparent reason
 
ISS teens and GHD teens btw so your claim is still not valid since theres not a source on healthy individuals
Omg you are beyond retarded, OFC They're wont be any clinics who will willingly test healthy teens who have no problems with potential significant hormone alteration compound, epecially during puberty, do you not have common sense, do you even understand in what language we are speaking??? Genuinely asking, also still doesnt fucking change the fact you grow dumbass, by your logic; is test/steroids useless if the guy is not deficient in T?? Surely thats why TRT existed
 

Similar threads

L
Replies
17
Views
258
iblameoverbite_01
iblameoverbite_01
B
Replies
3
Views
395
Jatt
Jatt
Catopkh
Replies
5
Views
302
shortassgingy
shortassgingy
R
  • Question
Looksmaxxing First peptide cycle
Replies
7
Views
405
Eat My Dust
Eat My Dust

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top