
ScientificLooksmax
ε ε ε ε ε ε ε ε
- Joined
- May 18, 2025
- Posts
- 386
- Reputation
- 526
Hunter-Gatherer Era (300,000 β 10,000 years ago) β OPTIMAL
- Freedom: Total. No rulers, no clocks, no jobs.
- Sexual access: Tribal, often egalitarian. Pair-bonding was common, but some groups had shared or open systems. Alpha males sometimes had more mates.
- Status: Based on skill β hunting, wisdom, courage.
- Manly values: Physical strength, survival skill, community leadership.
- Why good for men: Clear purpose, physical activity, high autonomy, natural social roles.

Ancient Civilizations (e.g., Mesopotamia, Egypt, China, India β 5,000β2,000 yrs ago)
- Freedom: Limited. Most men were farmers, soldiers, or laborers.
- Sexual access: Wealthy elites had harems, prostitutes, concubines; most common men had monogamy or little access.
- Status: Rigid. Based on birth or military power.
- Manly values: Obedience, strength, loyalty to rulers.
- Why mixed for men: Elite men had indulgence; average men were tools of the system.

Roman Empire (27 BCE β 476 CE)
- Freedom: High for elite Roman men; slaves and peasants had none.
- Sexual access: Rich men had slaves, prostitutes, and concubines; bisexual norms were common; masculinity = dominance.
- Status: Clear hierarchy β senators, soldiers, citizens, slaves.
- Manly values: Power, conquest, rhetoric, honor.
- Why decent for men: If you were a Roman citizen, especially rich or military, you had access, power, and women. But most men were still poor or slaves.

Medieval Europe (500β1500 CE)
- Freedom: Limited. Feudal lords ruled; most men were peasants or serfs.
- Sexual access: Monogamous, religious control of sex. Adultery punished.
- Status: Based on land and lineage.
- Manly values: Chivalry, loyalty, faith, fighting.
- Why rough for men: Hard work, no mobility, Church restricted freedom β little room to rise unless you became a knight or monk.

Islamic Golden Age / Ottoman / Mughal Eras
- Freedom: Moderate for Muslim men; restricted for others.
- Sexual access: Polygamy permitted; harems for elite.
- Status: Based on wealth, piety, military rank.
- Manly values: Honor, scholarship, warrior strength.
- Why decent for men: Faith guided life, but elite men had more women, more comfort. Ordinary men had families and structure.

Modern Era (Today)
- Freedom: High legally, but many men feel socially constrained.
- Sexual access: Technically free, but socially competitive; dating apps favor top men; many men report low access.
- Status: Wealth, looks, confidence, fame.
- Manly values: Conflicted β strength vs sensitivity, independence vs compliance.
- Why tough for men: Modern men face identity confusion, less purpose, lower physical challenge, social disconnection, and sexual frustration.

Summary Table β Male Life Comparison
Era | Freedom | Sexual Access | Status Path | Manly Values | Best for Men? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hunter-Gatherer | Very High | Tribal/open | Skill-based | Strength, survival | ![]() |
Ancient Civilizations | LowβMid | Elite only | Birth/military | Obedience, conquest | ![]() |
Roman Empire | High (for citizens) | High (if rich) | Military/political | Power, dominance | ![]() |
Medieval Europe | Low | Low | Birth only | Duty, faith | ![]() |
Islamic/Ottoman/Mughal | Moderate | ModerateβHigh | Religion, military | Honor, strength | ![]() |
Modern Era | Legally high | Competitive/unequal | Wealth/status | Conflicted | ![]() |
Final Take:
The hunter-gatherer era remains the most natural and fulfilling for most men β high freedom, physical purpose, social respect, and natural access to relationships. Modern life gives comfort but removes meaning. Ancient empires gave indulgence to the few, and hardship to the many.