ScientificLooksmax
卐 卐 卐 卐 卐 卐 卐 卐
- Joined
- May 18, 2025
- Posts
- 1,461
- Reputation
- 2,420
Hunter-Gatherer Era (300,000 – 10,000 years ago) – OPTIMAL
- Freedom: Total. No rulers, no clocks, no jobs.
- Sexual access: Tribal, often egalitarian. Pair-bonding was common, but some groups had shared or open systems. Alpha males sometimes had more mates.
- Status: Based on skill — hunting, wisdom, courage.
- Manly values: Physical strength, survival skill, community leadership.
- Why good for men: Clear purpose, physical activity, high autonomy, natural social roles.
Best balance of freedom, purpose, physicality, and respect.
Ancient Civilizations (e.g., Mesopotamia, Egypt, China, India – 5,000–2,000 yrs ago)
- Freedom: Limited. Most men were farmers, soldiers, or laborers.
- Sexual access: Wealthy elites had harems, prostitutes, concubines; most common men had monogamy or little access.
- Status: Rigid. Based on birth or military power.
- Manly values: Obedience, strength, loyalty to rulers.
- Why mixed for men: Elite men had indulgence; average men were tools of the system.
Great for the top 1%, hard for the rest.
Roman Empire (27 BCE – 476 CE)
- Freedom: High for elite Roman men; slaves and peasants had none.
- Sexual access: Rich men had slaves, prostitutes, and concubines; bisexual norms were common; masculinity = dominance.
- Status: Clear hierarchy — senators, soldiers, citizens, slaves.
- Manly values: Power, conquest, rhetoric, honor.
- Why decent for men: If you were a Roman citizen, especially rich or military, you had access, power, and women. But most men were still poor or slaves.
Good for elite, brutal for others. High sex access for top males.
Medieval Europe (500–1500 CE)
- Freedom: Limited. Feudal lords ruled; most men were peasants or serfs.
- Sexual access: Monogamous, religious control of sex. Adultery punished.
- Status: Based on land and lineage.
- Manly values: Chivalry, loyalty, faith, fighting.
- Why rough for men: Hard work, no mobility, Church restricted freedom — little room to rise unless you became a knight or monk.
Very little sexual or personal freedom unless you were a lord.
Islamic Golden Age / Ottoman / Mughal Eras
- Freedom: Moderate for Muslim men; restricted for others.
- Sexual access: Polygamy permitted; harems for elite.
- Status: Based on wealth, piety, military rank.
- Manly values: Honor, scholarship, warrior strength.
- Why decent for men: Faith guided life, but elite men had more women, more comfort. Ordinary men had families and structure.
Good structure for men, but access to sex/luxury was class-based.
Modern Era (Today)
- Freedom: High legally, but many men feel socially constrained.
- Sexual access: Technically free, but socially competitive; dating apps favor top men; many men report low access.
- Status: Wealth, looks, confidence, fame.
- Manly values: Conflicted — strength vs sensitivity, independence vs compliance.
- Why tough for men: Modern men face identity confusion, less purpose, lower physical challenge, social disconnection, and sexual frustration.
More comfort, but many men are lost, lonely, and struggling. Summary Table – Male Life Comparison
| Era | Freedom | Sexual Access | Status Path | Manly Values | Best for Men? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter-Gatherer | Very High | Tribal/open | Skill-based | Strength, survival | Yes |
| Ancient Civilizations | Low–Mid | Elite only | Birth/military | Obedience, conquest | Only elite |
| Roman Empire | High (for citizens) | High (if rich) | Military/political | Power, dominance | Good for top 20% |
| Medieval Europe | Low | Low | Birth only | Duty, faith |  No |
| Islamic/Ottoman/Mughal | Moderate | Moderate–High | Religion, military | Honor, strength | Good for upper tier |
| Modern Era | Legally high | Competitive/unequal | Wealth/status | Conflicted | Very mixed |
Final Take:
The hunter-gatherer era remains the most natural and fulfilling for most men — high freedom, physical purpose, social respect, and natural access to relationships. Modern life gives comfort but removes meaning. Ancient empires gave indulgence to the few, and hardship to the many.
