Which is better to have 0 failos and be bland asf like no striking features or be striking but 1 failo

[Deleted member 44964]

I know it depends but is having 0 failos but having zero striking features really good? Averageness is attractive so i think its much better

 

[incel194012940]

if you could figure out looks through logic without pictures engineers would be the most attractive men in human history

 

[Deleted member 23558]

if the failo is slight scleral show then yes

 

[HarrierDuBois]

Less failos is a better base to build off of.

 

[poopoohead]

Less failos is a better base to build off of.

true but what can you really do to become striking if you're bland? eye color surgery or jaw/zygo implants? may come out an uncanny result. However, if you are striking with one failo, you can fix it with little surgeries and have traits that are not able to be replicated through a surgery.

 

[Deleted member 40471]

Having no failos is already striking.

Imagine a guy with good mid face ratio.
Good jaw with no failos
Eyes compact, checkbones high set, maxilla forward grown, brow ridge prominent...

That is more than enough to produce a good face

Look at Jamie Lannister

He doesn't even have ideal colouring or anything just no failos

 

[bossbaby]

striking with 1 failo, my reasoning is a certain segment of the population will overlook certain failos. For example 10% (guess) of girls don't mind baldness.

You would appeal more to the average person bland but nichmaxxing is about maximizing

 

[Secretok]

harder to add striking features than it is to fix failos in most cases